In its annual analysis of trends in global carbon dioxide emissions, the Global Carbon Project (GCP) published three peer - reviewed articles identifying the challenges for society to keep
global average warming less than 2 °C above pre-industrial levels.
Not exact matches
On one hand, areas of high climatic stability are predicted to
warm less than the
global average.
The results show that even though there has been a slowdown in the
warming of the
global average temperatures on the surface of Earth, the
warming has continued strongly throughout the troposphere except for a very thin layer at around 14 - 15 km above the surface of Earth where it has
warmed slightly
less.
«
Global fisheries to be, on
average, 20 percent
less productive in 2300, UCI study finds:
Warming - induced plankton growth near Antarctica will impair marine food chain.»
Today he is an official delegate advising island nations that are seeking to limit
average global warming to 1.5 degrees C — or preferably
less.
That means that a climate with a lot of CO2
warming partially offset in the
global average by a lot of regional aerosol cooling is still a very different climate than one with no anthropogenic aerosols and
less CO2.
owners who never drive the exotics they purchase [98 % of Ferrari buyers drive their cars
less than 500 miles a year and keep them on
average for
less than 24 months]...
global warming on the rise [with pretend» Hybrid» supercars doing nothing to help the situation]... etc etc etc
You can also see in this graph that the
warming trend in the
global data for the low troposphere, if we consider the whole set of data, i.e. from the
average between 1980 - 1982 till now, with now meaning the
average of the last three years, the
warming trend is, AT MOST, 0.115 ºC / decade (0.3 ºC in 26 years), but the graph is going down recently, so it should be even
less.
A situation which you describe in the paper (see Figures 3a, 3b, first full paragraph of page 461, that the reconstructed trends for the Peninsula are
less than the
global average and yet you describe is as one of the most rapidly
warming places on earth, that your Figure 4e has spatial differences compared with Supplemental Figure 1c and 1d or the image you linked to in comment 18), and which renders that spatial detail of the cover image difficult to interpret.
The 47,000 wildfires last year may seem like a very large number — and it certainly gives
global warming alarmists like Brown plenty of fodder for misleading
global warming claims — but the 47,000 wildfires was
less than half the
average number of wildfires that occurred each year in the 1960s and 1970s.
bozzza - The differences in the Arctic are perhaps 1/4 the ocean thermal mass as
global ocean
averages, small overall size (the smallest ocean), being almost surrounded by land (which
warms faster), more limited liquid interchanges due to bottlenecking than the Antarctic, and very importantly considerable susceptibility to positive albedo feedbacks; as
less summer ice is present given current trends, solar energy absorbed by the Arctic ocean goes up very rapidly.
However, some of the consequences of the basic physics, including higher
average temperatures due to «
global warming», are
less certain (although highly probable).
But that's on top of the fact that you can't even find harm for the level of
warming we currently have or much link between
global average temperature and climate change, much
less adverse climate change.
Donald Trump, President of the US, has announced that he is withdrawing the US from the Paris Agreement to limit climate change to
less than 2 °C
average global warming.
In order to avoid the most devastating impacts of
global warming, climate scientists have warned that emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases need to be cut in order to keep the increase in
average global temperature to
less than 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit (2 degrees Celsius).
The two solar cycles from 1976 to 1996 had a stronger solar magnetic field with more GCR deflection leading to 3 %
less average cosmic ray flux, fewer shading clouds, and the
global warming scare.
Based on the Cohen et al paper it's likely that leaving out the most volatile data series would in the present case result in a time series where
warming continues with
less plateauing than we see in the existing data on
global average surface temperature.
One study estimates that there are likely to be places on Earth where unprotected humans without cooling mechanisms, such as air conditioning, would die in
less than six hours if
global average surface temperature rises by about 12.6 ° F (7 ° C).16 With
warming of 19.8 - 21.6 ° F (11 - 12 ° C), this same study projects that regions where approximately half of the world's people now live could become intolerable.7
While the richest income class in this study, earning more than 30,000 rupees a month, produce slightly
less than the
global average CO2 emissions of 5 tonnes, this amount already exceeds the sustainable
global average CO2 emissions of 2.5 tonnes per capita that needs to be reached to limit
global warming below 2 degrees centigrade.
In contrast, the
average warming rate for stations situated in a county with
less than 100,000 people was a paltry 0.04 °F per century.6 The
warming rate of sparsely populated counties was 35 times
less than the
global average.
The slowdown or «hiatus» in
warming refers to the period since 2001, when despite ongoing increases in atmospheric greenhouse gases, Earth's
global average surface air temperature has remained more or
less steady,
warming by only around 0.1 C.
When you base your robust disbelief of the link between recent prodigious crop failures and realized
warming on what you call the «relatively minor»
global average mean anomaly you are demonstrating either
less than full appreciation of what nine tenths of a degree could mean for regional weather over shorter periods, or what such weather could mean for agriculture.
For the
average consumer, stronger standards would translate to fewer
global warming emissions associated with the products we use and love, and more affordable shipping as companies realize the cost - saving benefits of using
less fuel.
The 2007 IPCC report found that the cost of actions to stabilize concentrations of heat - trapping emissions at a level that gives us a good chance of avoiding dangerous
warming would amount to
less than a 0.12 percent reduction in
average annual
global gross domestic product (GDP) growth rate in 2050.
It is plausible, for example, that AMS members skeptical of
global warming may have been
less likely than the
average member to respond, potentially by virtue of feeling marginalized within their professional society as a result of the views on the issue.
And yet, the
average Chinese still consumes
less than 20 percent of the energy consumed by the
average American, meaning that the Chinese contribution to
global warming is going to grow tremendously.
A
less sensitive climate system would mean
average warming of
less than 2 degrees C and, therefore, fewer ramifications from
global warming.
Specifically, the study found that» [d] uring much of last year's hurricane season, sea - surface temperatures across the tropical Atlantic between 10 and 20 degrees north... were a record 1.7 degrees F above the 1901 - 1970
average,» «
global warming explained about 0.8 degrees F of this rise,» while» [a] ftereffects from the 2004 - 05 El Nino accounted for about 0.4 degrees F,» and a natural cycle in sea - surface temperatures «explained
less than 0.2 degrees F of the rise.»
Significantly
less warming in Antarctica than the
global average, and most of the
warming concentrated to the Westernmost part.
Based on survey data gathered between 2008 and 2014, people living in the central US tended to be
less worried about
global warming than the national
average, while residents of drought - stricken California showed noticeably more concern.
Warming is
less than the
global average in southern parts of Asia and South America, Southern Ocean areas (containing many small islands) and the North Atlantic (Figure 2.6 a).
While many scientists and climate change activists hailed December's Paris agreement as a historic step forward for international efforts to limit
global warming, the landmark accord rests on a highly dubious assumption: to achieve the goal of limiting the rise in
global average temperature to
less than 2 °C (much
less the more ambitious goal of 1.5 °C), we don't just need to reduce emissions of carbon dioxide to essentially zero by the end of this century.