Jain, A.K., et al., Distribution of radiocarbon as a test of
global carbon cycle models.
Robert Berner of Yale University is a real Hero of the Earth who is not sufficiently known outside the field of Phanerozoic
global carbon cycle modeling.
(oh, and the whole 13C thing has been known for a long time: «(2) consistent relationships between δ13C and CO2 (Rayner et al., 1999),» — or, google «13c
global carbon cycle model»)
Not exact matches
The new
modeling tool —
Carbon, Organisms, Rhizosphere and Protection in the Soil Environment, or CORPSE — represents a major advance in the ability of scientists to simulate the
global carbon cycle.
The
models must track how
carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases
cycle through the whole system — how the gases interact with plant life, oceans, the atmosphere — and how this influences overall
global temperatures.
By reconstructing past
global warming and the
carbon cycle on Earth 56 million years ago, researchers from the Niels Bohr Institute among others have used computer
modelling to estimate the potential perspective for future
global warming, which could be even warmer than previously thought.
Professor Friedlingstein, who is an expert in
global carbon cycle studies added: «Current land
carbon cycle models do not show this increase over the last 50 years, perhaps because these
models underestimate emerging drought effects on tropical ecosystems.»
Mouchet, A., and L. François, 1996: Sensitivity of a
global oceanic
carbon cycle model to the circulation and to the fate of organic matter: Preliminary results.
Ricke and Caldeira sought to correct that by combining the results from two large
modeling studies one about the way
carbon emissions interact with the
global carbon cycle and one about the effect of
carbon on the Earth's climate used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
Sitch, S., et al., 2003: Evaluation of ecosystem dynamics, plant geography and terrestrial
carbon cycling in the LPJ dynamic
global vegetation
model.
M2009 use a simplified
carbon cycle and climate
model to make a large ensemble of simulations in which principal uncertainties in the
carbon cycle, radiative forcings, and climate response are allowed to vary, thus yielding a probability distribution for
global warming as a function of time throughout the 21st century.
A
global warming target is converted to a fossil fuel emissions target with the help of
global climate -
carbon -
cycle models, which reveal that eventual warming depends on cumulative
carbon emissions, not on the temporal history of emissions [12].
ECCO
model - data syntheses are being used to quantify the ocean's role in the
global carbon cycle, to understand the recent evolution of the polar oceans, to monitor time - evolving heat, water, and chemical exchanges within and between different components of the Earth system, and for many other science applications.
Proposed explanations for the discrepancy include ocean — atmosphere coupling that is too weak in
models, insufficient energy cascades from smaller to larger spatial and temporal scales, or that
global climate
models do not consider slow climate feedbacks related to the
carbon cycle or interactions between ice sheets and climate.
Furthermore, ocean acidification is happening even more quickly in the Arctic, as shown in Stenacher et al. (2009, April), «Imminent ocean acidification in the Arctic projected with the NCAR
global coupled
carbon cycle - climate
model,» http://www.biogeosciences.net/6/515/2009/bg-6-515-2009.pdf (open access):
eg pg xii To improve our predictive capability, we need: • to understand better the various climate - related processes, particularly those associated with clouds, oceans and the
carbon cycle • to improve the systematic observation of climate - related variables on a
global basis, and further investigate changes which took place in the past • to develop improved
models of the Earth's climate system • to increase support for national and international climate research activities, especially in developing countries • to facilitate international exchange of climate data
The coupled climate
carbon cycle intercomparison project (C4MIP) will permit the assessment of
model sensitivity of the
carbon cycle to
global temperature change.
It combines representations of the
global economy, energy systems, agriculture and land use, with representation of terrestrial and ocean
carbon cycles, a suite of coupled gas -
cycle, climate, and ice - melt
models.
We introduce a
carbon cycle model that would explain the PETM by
global warming following a bolide impact, leading to the oxidation of terrestrial organic
carbon stores built up during the late Paleocene.
Thermometer shows the
global - mean temperature increase above pre-industrial by 2100, with an uncertainty range originating from
carbon -
cycle and climate
modelling.
Peter Cox is the originator / author of the Triffid dynamic
global vegetation
model which was used to predict dieback of the Amazonian rain forest by 2050 and as a consequence a strong positive climate -
carbon cycle feedback (i.e., an acceleration of
global warming) with a resultant increase in
global mean surface temperature by 8 deg.
Cox, P. M., Betts, R. A., Jones, C. D., Spal, A. S. & Totterdell, I. J. Acceleration of
global warming due to
carbon -
cycle feedbacks in a coupled climate
model.
Our study implies that the use of a
global relationship between pCO2 and temperature independent of the geography in long time scale
carbon cycle model [37] and [38] may induce significant errors.»
Mathematical physicist Enting (author of the Australian Mathematical Scences Institute book Twisted: The distorted mathematics of greenhouse denial) worked at Australia's leading science agency, the CSIRO, for 24 years in atmospheric research and
modelling of the
global carbon cycle.
Evaluation of the terrestrial
carbon cycle, future plant geography and climate -
carbon cycle feedbacks using five Dynamic
Global Vegetation
Models (DGVMs)
The results hold implications for land management, improved climate change
models, and a better understanding of
carbon cycling in soil microbial communities and how changes in
global temperatures impact Earth's deserts.
Posted in Research Blogging, tagged
carbon cycle, climate change, climate
models, education, geoengineering,
global warming, ocean acidification, programming, science, sea ice on September 16, 2012 14 Comments»
Second, using measured atmospheric CO2 concentrations short circuits two layers of
modeling which themselves are major sources of uncertainty, namely, estimating
global emissions and, then, estimating the atmospheric CO2 concentrations (based on complex
models of the
global carbon cycle).
M2009 use a simplified
carbon cycle and climate
model to make a large ensemble of simulations in which principal uncertainties in the
carbon cycle, radiative forcings, and climate response are allowed to vary, thus yielding a probability distribution for
global warming as a function of time throughout the 21st century.
Imminent ocean acidification in the Arctic projected with the NCAR
global coupled
carbon cycle - climate
model
Thirdly, Earth system
models have begun to incorporate more realistic and dynamic vegetation components, which quantify positive and negative biotic feedbacks by coupling a dynamic biosphere to atmospheric circulations with a focus on the
global carbon cycle (Friedlingstein et al., 2003, 2006; Cox et al., 2004, 2006).
Study: Long - term warming equivalent to 10 °C per century could be sufficient to trigger compost - bomb instability in drying organic soils Wiley: First generation climate —
carbon cycle models suggest that climate change will suppress
carbon accumulation in soils, and could even lead to a net loss of
global soil
carbon over the next century.
Wiley: First generation climate —
carbon cycle models suggest that climate change will suppress
carbon accumulation in soils, and could even lead to a net loss of
global soil
carbon over the next century.
An improved
global understanding of nutrient availability would therefore greatly improve
carbon cycle modelling and should become a critical focus for future research.
Scientists» understanding of the fundamental processes responsible for
global climate change has greatly improved during the last decade, including better representation of
carbon, water, and other biogeochemical
cycles in climate
models.
IPCC's «Greenhouse Effect
Global Warming» dogma rests on invalid presumptions and a rejectable non-realistic
carbon cycle modelling which simply refutes reality, like the existence of carbonated beer or soda «pop» as we know it.
Ken Caldeira has been a Carnegie investigator since 2005 and is world renowned for his
modeling and other work on the
global carbon cycle; marine biogeochemistry and chemical oceanography, including ocean acidification and the atmosphere / ocean
carbon cycle; land - cover and climate change; the long - term evolution of climate and geochemical
cycles; climate intervention proposals; and energy technology.
Bala, G., K. Caldeira, A. Mirin, M. Wickett, and C. Delira, Multicentury changes to the
global climate and
carbon cycle: Results from a coupled climate and
carbon cycle model, Journal of Climate, 18, 4531 - 4544, 2005.