Not exact matches
This
seems really odd: the publlc demand made by scientists who are most alarmed by
global warming is precisely not that more money go into reasearch, but rather that money go into research to increase fuel efficiency to develope
carbon -
emission - free fuel sources.
BTW, Hansen's «
Global Warming in the 21st Century: An Alternative Scenario»
seems to accept that CO2 control would be much more difficult than cleaning up black
carbon emissions from power stations.
«Absent a dramatic
global policy shift, such as a universal tax on
carbon emissions, the study
seems to suggest that the 2 °C goal is far out of reach,» National Geographic reported.
It is not particularly surprising that they could not find one to argue against the reality of
carbon emissions - driven
global warming, but it still
seems a bit of an unfair difference in stature to have the position backed up by corporate - sponsored pseudoscience be represented by a member of Congress, against a man known primarily for shouting «science!»
Most of the modest and short - term reductions in
emissions seem to be related primarily to the 2008
global recession, not to the
carbon tax.
Given the
global economic implications of
carbon dioxide
emission mitigation and the fact that geopolitical strategising tends not to be shared with the public at large, it
seems inevitable that any attempt to answer your question will be denounced as a conspiracy theory.
In fact, it is true that reducing
carbon emissions blamed for
global warming depends on changing behaviour across society, but even that conviction
seems to be missing, Seidl said.
As a non-climatologist, it
seems logical to me that
carbon dioxide
emissions will cause
global warming in some form — but if
global warming meltdown starts in eight years» time, I will eat my copy of Six Degrees, appendices and all.
It may
seem a bit wonky as an issue itself, but the growing
carbon trade war precipitated by the European Union airline
emission trading program, now roughly six weeks in effect, really is indicative of the continued
global denial about the environmental impact of our activities.
Thus, for instance, resistance to climate science in the United States
seems to be linked to a libertarian economic outlook: People who resist what experts tell them about
global warming often appear, at heart, to be most worried about the consequences of increased government regulation of
carbon emissions.