We are still headed in the right direction, but since the U.S. took its foot off the accelerator, the risk of
global climate action slowing down has increased.
Not exact matches
The study examined the benefits of
global and domestic GHG mitigation on US air quality and human health in 2050, comparing a scenario with no
global action to reduce GHGs with an aggressive scenario that significantly
slows climate change.
This builds on the momentum of the unprecedented effort which has so far seen 188 countries contribute
climate action plans to the new agreement, which will dramatically
slow the pace of
global greenhouse gas emissions.
A report released today by the UNFCCC secretariat, assessing the collective impact of over 140 national
climate action plans, indicates that together they can dramatically
slow global emissions into the atmosphere.
The very things we need to do to adapt to a changing
climate are exactly the same
actions we need to take to
slow down, or even reverse,
global warming in the first place.
Fast
action to reduce short - lived
climate pollutants (SLCPs) could
slow the rate of
global warming while saving millions of lives over the next several decades from air pollution — which now kills more than 6 million people a year.
You may wonder why the government finds the need to pursue such
action since 1) U.S. carbon dioxide emissions have already topped out and have generally been on the decline for the past 7 - 8 years or so (from technological advances in natural gas extraction and a
slow economy more so than from already - enacted government regulations and subsidies); 2) greenhouse gases from the rest of the world (primarily driven by China) have been sky - rocketing over the same period, which lessens any impacts that our emissions reduction have); and 3) even in their totality, U.S. carbon dioxide emissions have a negligible influence on local / regional /
global climate change (even a immediate and permanent cessation of all our carbon dioxide emissions would likely result in a mitigation of
global temperature rise of less than one - quarter of a degree C by the end of the century).
At the just - concluded U.N.
climate negotiations in Poznan, Poland, Earthjustice attorneys Martin Wagner and Erika Rosenthal advocated for rapid
action to reduce emissions of black carbon, now considered one of the most effective strategies to
slow near - term
global and Arctic warming.
The study - published in this spring's Sociological Quarterly - documents opinions on
global warming, and seems to confirm that
global warming has become yet another political totem issue; a worrying sign for the chances of moving forward from debate to
action on
slowing climate change
Mark Lynas's Six Degrees * is first, a graceful yet massive synthesis of a very large selection of scientific research papers; second, an eloquent and honest plea for
action on the «
slow - motion crisis» that is
climate change; and third, a coherent account of how
global warming would affect humans and their world, if allowed to proceed.
A draft copy of the report by the IPCC's Working Group Three, leaked last week, paints a grim portrait of the
global failure to
slow greenhouse gas emissions and says that if rapid
action is not taken, severe
climate and economic disruption will occur.