[The MIT] study used six newly upgraded
global climate computer models to simulate future hurricane activity around the world.
«Existing
global climate computer models tend to underestimate the effects of natural forces on climate change..»
Not exact matches
It would be like trying to
model 1000 years of
global climate change on a TRS - 80
computer when it takes a modern 16,000 processor supercomputer a week to process the data.
Smith and his former research assistant Andrew Mizrahi used a PNNL
computer model, the Global Change Assessment Model, or GCAM, to evaluate the impact of reducing soot and methane emissions on Earth's cli
model, the
Global Change Assessment
Model, or GCAM, to evaluate the impact of reducing soot and methane emissions on Earth's cli
Model, or GCAM, to evaluate the impact of reducing soot and methane emissions on Earth's
climate.
Looking ahead, engineers have set their sights even higher, on
computers a thousand times as fast as Tianhe - 1A that could
model the
global climate with unprecedented accuracy, simulate molecular interactions, and track terrorist activity.
«Being based on
climate records, this approach avoids any biases that might affect the sophisticated
computer models that are commonly used for understanding
global warming.»
Although
computer models used to project
climate changes from increasing greenhouse gas concentrations consistently simulate an increasing upward airflow in the tropics with
global warming, this flow can not be directly observed.
The researchers plugged this information into a
computer model to find out the effect on the
climate of increasing tree cover and diminishing grassland and found that it led to a
global temperature increase of about 0.1 °C (Geophysical Research Letters, DOI: 10.1029 / 2010gl043985).
Still, the increase is about what's predicted by
computer models of
global climate.
Meehl and his colleagues used two sophisticated
computer models of
global climate to predict what would happen under various scenarios for greenhouse gas emission controls, taking into account the oceanic time lag.
Moreover, our analysis does not depend on large, complex
global climate models, the huge
computer programs that are notorious for their hidden assumptions and adjustable parameters.
After the field campaign, Fast will perform
computer simulations to help evaluate all of the field campaign data and quantify the uncertainties associated with using coarse grid
global climate models to study megacity emissions and to determine the radiative impact of the Mexico City particulates on the local and regional
climate.
These
climate scientists analyzed 25 different
computer models of
global climate.
CESM
models the
global climate, providing state - of - the - art
computer simulations of the Earth's past, present, and future
climate states.
At UW — Madison, Holloway leads a research program in the Nelson Institute Center for Sustainability and the
Global Environment that employs
computer models and satellite data to understand links between regional air quality, energy and
climate.
The GISS
Global Climate Model (GCM) is already made up of hundreds of thousands of lines of
computer code, and now it will be expanded substantially to allow for the 3D visualization of exoplanet
climates and planetary dynamics as well.
«Imagine basing a country's energy and economic policy on an incomplete, unproven theory — a theory based entirely on
computer models in which one minor variable (CO2) is considered the sole driver for the entire
global climate system.»
Complex systems are studied using information theory and
computer simulation
models (e.g.
global climate models.)
The authors compared recently constructed temperature data sets from Antarctica, based on data from ice cores and ground weather stations, to 20th century simulations from
computer models used by scientists to simulate
global climate.
Even if the study were right... (which it is not) mainstream scientists use * three * methods to predict a
global warming trend... not just
climate computer models (which stand up extremely well for general projections by the way) under world - wide scrutiny... and have for all intents and purposes already correctly predicted the future -(Hansen 1988 in front of Congress and Pinatubo).
Global Warming:
Computer models used by environmentalists predict imminent and disastrous
climate change.
Latham has been collaborating with the UK Meteorological Office to test the theory behind his project using their powerful
computer model of
global climate.
NASA
computer models reveal what a small, regional nuclear war in one part of the world would do to the
global climate and environment.
Benjamin Sulman − a biologist at Indiana University, but then of the Princeton University Environmental Institute in the US − and colleagues report in Nature
Climate Change that they have developed a new
computer model to examine what really happens, on a
global scale, when plants colonise the soil and start taking in moisture and carbon from the atmosphere.
Climate realists say that the entire
global - warming behemoth ought to be axed entirely — especially considering recent developments that experts say have thoroughly debunked the United Nations» warming theories and wildly inaccurate
computer models.
Climate alarmism is not based on empirical observation; rather, it is entirely predicated on
computer models that are manipulated to generate predictions of significant
global warming as a result of increased concentrations of CO2.
Computer scientists that do
global -
climate modeling are fairly well set up to deal with thinking about that sort of thing.
Thanks to a growing body of scientific evidence and improved
computer models that can project
climate changes more accurately and in much finer detail, each report has proclaimed with greater and greater certainty that human activity is the main cause of
global warming.
In March 2009, Michaels, under the auspices of the Cato Institute, circulated a draft advertisement that stated: «Surface temperature changes over the past century have been episodic and modest and there has been no net
global warming for over a decade now... The
computer models forecasting rapid temperature change abjectly fail to explain recent
climate behavior.»
Assuming that no action is taken to reduce emissions,
computer models of the earth's
climate indicate that
global average surface temperatures will rise by 1.5 - 4.5 C over the next 100 years.
Air pressure changes, allergies increase, Alps melting, anxiety, aggressive polar bears, algal blooms, Asthma, avalanches, billions of deaths, blackbirds stop singing, blizzards, blue mussels return, boredom, budget increases, building season extension, bushfires, business opportunities, business risks, butterflies move north, cannibalistic polar bears, cardiac arrest, Cholera, civil unrest, cloud increase, cloud stripping, methane emissions from plants, cold spells (Australia),
computer models, conferences, coral bleaching, coral reefs grow, coral reefs shrink, cold spells, crumbling roads, buildings and sewage systems, damages equivalent to $ 200 billion, Dengue hemorrhagic fever, dermatitis, desert advance, desert life threatened, desert retreat, destruction of the environment, diarrhoea, disappearance of coastal cities, disaster for wine industry (US), Dolomites collapse, drought, drowning people, drowning polar bears, ducks and geese decline, dust bowl in the corn belt, early spring, earlier pollen season, earthquakes, Earth light dimming, Earth slowing down, Earth spinning out of control, Earth wobbling, El Nià ± o intensification, erosion, emerging infections, encephalitis,, Everest shrinking, evolution accelerating, expansion of university
climate groups, extinctions (ladybirds, pandas, pikas, polar bears, gorillas, whales, frogs, toads, turtles, orang - utan, elephants, tigers, plants, salmon, trout, wild flowers, woodlice, penguins, a million species, half of all animal and plant species), experts muzzled, extreme changes to California, famine, farmers go under, figurehead sacked, fish catches drop, fish catches rise, fish stocks decline, five million illnesses, floods, Florida economic decline, food poisoning, footpath erosion, forest decline, forest expansion, frosts, fungi invasion, Garden of Eden wilts, glacial retreat, glacial growth,
global cooling, glowing clouds, Gore omnipresence, Great Lakes drop, greening of the North, Gulf Stream failure, Hantavirus pulmonary syndrome, harvest increase, harvest shrinkage, hay fever epidemic, heat waves, hibernation ends too soon, hibernation ends too late, human fertility reduced, human health improvement, hurricanes, hydropower problems, hyperthermia deaths, ice sheet growth, ice sheet shrinkage, inclement weather, Inuit displacement, insurance premium rises, invasion of midges, islands sinking, itchier poison ivy, jellyfish explosion, Kew Gardens taxed, krill decline, landslides, landslides of ice at 140 mph, lawsuits increase, lawyers» income increased (surprise surprise!)
These
climate - related land storage effects could be significant for
global sea - levels, though unfortunately there seem to be very few direct experimental measurements of the factors involved, and so the only studies of these effects seem to have been from
computer modelling of data from weather data «reanalysis»
models (e.g., ERA - 40).
Using
computer climate models, scientists estimate that by the year 2100 the average
global temperature will increase by 1.4 degrees to 5.8 degrees Celsius (approximately 2.5 degrees to 10.5 degrees Fahrenheit).
Over the last three decades, five IPCC «assessment reports,» dozens of
computer models, scores of conferences and thousands of papers focused heavily on human fossil fuel use and carbon dioxide and greenhouse gas emissions, as being responsible for «dangerous»
global warming,
climate change,
climate «disruption,» and almost every «extreme» weather or
climate event.
Wine Terroir and
Climate Change by John Gladstones (Wakefield Press 2015) concludes that viticulture in Australia is not threatened by global warming, and that much of the computer modelling that underpins the climate change hype is
Climate Change by John Gladstones (Wakefield Press 2015) concludes that viticulture in Australia is not threatened by
global warming, and that much of the
computer modelling that underpins the
climate change hype is
climate change hype is wrong.
Then, in 2009, the exposure of emails between the «scientists» responsible for the data the UN Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change (IPCC) was putting out to scare the pants off of everyone about «
global warming» — since dubbed Climategate — revealed they were not only rigging the
computer models, but were increasingly worried that the planet had entered a new, perfectly natural, cooling cycle.
Although mainstream scientists do identify considerable uncertainties in their
climate predictions, which are based on
computer models, they are increasingly confident that
global warming is a serious problem and often say that the uncertainties do not justify inaction.
Using a detailed
computer simulation of
global economic activity and
climate processes, they ran the
model 400 times with possible tweaks.
The «claim» of the United Nations» Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change that humans are almost solely responsible for global warming «is not proven except in their computer models and can not be proven until we understand how much climate varies naturally,» he wrote on his w
Climate Change that humans are almost solely responsible for
global warming «is not proven except in their
computer models and can not be proven until we understand how much
climate varies naturally,» he wrote on his w
climate varies naturally,» he wrote on his website.
National Geographic, like other choristers in the anthropogenic
global warming (AGW) alarmist choir, is hyping the latest «
climate research,» in this case, the new
computer modeling program of a team at the University College of London's (UCL) Institute for Sustainable Resources.
«Thus,
global climate models are nothing but a very expensive form of
computer game entertainment.»
The feedbacks can be studied in the
global climate models running on the big
computers.
In addition to surveying actual temperatures in recent decades, Meehl and his co-authors turned to a sophisticated
computer model of
global climate to determine how record high and low temperatures are likely to change during the course of this century.
C40 Cities
Climate Leadership Group, 12 California, 7, 68, 102, 128, 169 - 170, 187, 196, 232 - 234, 245 California Energy Commission, 232 Cambridge Media Environment Programme (CMEP), 167 - 168 Cambridge University, 102 Cameron, David, 11, 24, 218 Cameroon, 25 Campbell, Philip, 165 Canada, 22, 32, 64, 111, 115, 130, 134, 137, 156 - 157, 166, 169, 177, 211, 222, 224 - 226, 230, 236, 243 Canadian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society (CMOS), 15 Cap - and - trade, 20, 28, 40 - 41, 44, 170, 175 allowances (permits), 41 - 42, 176, 243 Capitalism, 34 - 35, 45 Capps, Lois, 135 Car (see vehicle) Carbon, 98, 130 Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS), 192 Carbon Capture and Storage Association, 164 Carbon credits (offsets), 28 - 29, 42 - 43, 45 Carbon Cycle, 80 - 82 Carbon dioxide (CO2), 9, 18, 23, 49 - 51, 53, 55, 66 - 67, 72 - 89, 91, 98 - 99, 110, 112, 115, 118, 128 - 132, 137, 139, 141 - 144, 152, 240 emissions, 12, 18 - 25, 28 - 30, 32 - 33, 36 - 38, 41 - 44, 47, 49, 53, 55, 71 - 72, 74, 77 - 78, 81 - 82, 108 - 109, 115, 132, 139, 169, 186, 199 - 201, 203 - 204, 209 - 211, 214, 217, 219, 224, 230 - 231, 238, 241, 243 - 244 Carbon Dioxide Analysis Center, 19 Carbon Expo, 42 Carbon, footprint, 3, 13, 29, 35, 41, 45, 110, 132 tax, 20, 44, 170 trading, 13, 20, 40, 43, 44, 176, 182 Carbon monoxide (CO), 120 Carbon Reduction Commitment (CRC), 44 Carlin, George, 17 Carter, Bob, 63 Carter, Jimmy, 186, 188 Cato Institute, 179 CBS, 141, 146 Center for Disease Control, 174 Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and
Global Change, 62, 139 Centre for Policy Studies, 219 CERN (European Organization for Nuclear Research), 96 Chavez, Hugo, 34 Chicago Tribune, 146 China, 29, 32 - 33, 60 - 62, 120, 169, 176, 187 - 188, 211, 216, 225 - 226, 242 - 243 China's National Population and Planning Commission, 33 Chinese Academy of Sciences, 60 Chirac, Jacques, 36 Chlorofluorocarbons, 42 - 43, 50 Choi, Yong - Sang, 88 Christy, John, 105 Churchill, Winston, 214, 220 Chu, Steven, 187 Citibank (Citigroup), 40, 176 Clean Air Act, 85, 128 - 129 Clean Development Mechanism, 42
Climate Action Partnership, 14
Climate alarm, 4, 13, 21, 32, 35, 38, 56, 102 - 103, 115 - 117, 120, 137, 156, 168, 173, 182
Climate Audit, 66
Climate change, adaptation, 39, 110, 112 mitigation, 16, 39, 110
Climate Change and the Failure of Democracy, 34
Climate Change: Picturing the Science, 121
Climate Change Reconsidered, 242
Climate conference, 38 Cancun, 18, 29, 36 - 37, 124 - 125, 242 Copenhagen, 33, 36, 109, 125, 156, 158, 175, 241 - 242 Durban, 13, 36 - 37, 166, 242 - 243 Climategate, 2, 67, 152, 158 - 170, 180, 182, 242
Climate Protection Agreement, 12
Climate Research Unit (CRU), 48, 67, 120, 147, 152 - 153, 158 - 160, 162 - 163, 165 - 167, 169
Climate Science Register, 142 Climatism, definition, 2, 7 Clinton, Bill, 176, 178 Clinton
Global Initiative, 176 CLOUD project, 96 Club of Rome, 21, 186 CO2Science, 59, 61 - 62, 66, 131 Coal, 19 - 20, 39 - 41, 80, 126, 128 - 129, 175, 185 - 186, 188 - 190, 192 - 196, 199 - 201, 209, 214, 217, 219, 222, 229 Coase, Ronald, 145 Coca - Cola, 138 Cogley, Graham, 156 Cohen, David, 220 Colorado State University, 117, 181 Columbia University, 7 Columbus, Christopher, 58
Computer models, 16, 51 - 53, 56, 67, 72, 74,77 - 79, 82, 87, 89 - 91, 94, 105, 110 - 111, 120, 124, 138 - 140, 168, 171,173, 181, 238, 240, 246 Conference on the Changing Atmosphere, 15 Consensus, scientific, 12 Copenhagen Business School, 134 Coral, 53 Corporate Average Fuel Economy, 22 - 23 Cosmic Rays, 72, 93 - 99, 180 Credit Suisse, 176 Crow, Cheryl, 30 Crowley, Tom, 167 Cuadrilla Resources, 224 - 225 Curry, Judith, 164, 167 Cycles, natural, 3, 16, 57, 62 - 63, 66 - 69, 72, 80, 99, 103, 138, 238, 240 Milankovich, 62, 67, 80 Cyprus, 134 Czech Republic, 12, 37
One area of controversy has to do with the reliability of
computer models of the
global climate system.
Computers don» t have the capacity, and we don» t have the data or understanding, to create
climate models that can recreate
global climate or make accurate forecasts.
The frigid weather, freezing families, record budget deficits, soaring unemployment — and complete failure of
global warming
computer models to predict anything other than «a warmer than normal winter» — have caused a meltdown in Europe's longstanding
climate and energy policies.
Climate computer models falsely assume that plant - fertilizing carbon dioxide drives climate change... and predict average global temperatures a full 1 degree F higher than have actually been observed by satellites and weather balloons, a gap that is widening ever
Climate computer models falsely assume that plant - fertilizing carbon dioxide drives
climate change... and predict average global temperatures a full 1 degree F higher than have actually been observed by satellites and weather balloons, a gap that is widening ever
climate change... and predict average
global temperatures a full 1 degree F higher than have actually been observed by satellites and weather balloons, a gap that is widening every year.
Despite this, supporters of the anthropogenic
global warming cause regard
climate model computer projections as indisputable predictions, ignoring all else.
Edwards, P., 2010, «A Vast Machine,
Computer Models,
Climate Data, and the Politics of
Global Warming,» MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass..