Sentences with phrase «global climate disruption for»

Beyond some unions that legitimately fear harmful effects on their members, the attacks on the Clean Power Plan are coming from the same anti-union corporate polluters that have sought to destroy the labor movement and fought any attempt to address global climate disruption for decades.

Not exact matches

Among the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially are the following: (1) worldwide economic, political, and capital markets conditions and other factors beyond the Company's control, including natural and other disasters or climate change affecting the operations of the Company or its customers and suppliers; (2) the Company's credit ratings and its cost of capital; (3) competitive conditions and customer preferences; (4) foreign currency exchange rates and fluctuations in those rates; (5) the timing and market acceptance of new product offerings; (6) the availability and cost of purchased components, compounds, raw materials and energy (including oil and natural gas and their derivatives) due to shortages, increased demand or supply interruptions (including those caused by natural and other disasters and other events); (7) the impact of acquisitions, strategic alliances, divestitures, and other unusual events resulting from portfolio management actions and other evolving business strategies, and possible organizational restructuring; (8) generating fewer productivity improvements than estimated; (9) unanticipated problems or delays with the phased implementation of a global enterprise resource planning (ERP) system, or security breaches and other disruptions to the Company's information technology infrastructure; (10) financial market risks that may affect the Company's funding obligations under defined benefit pension and postretirement plans; and (11) legal proceedings, including significant developments that could occur in the legal and regulatory proceedings described in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10 - K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017, and any subsequent quarterly reports on Form 10 - Q (the «Reports»).

Now, White House science adviser John Holdren is renewing his call for a new nomenclature to describe the end result of dumping vast quantities of carbon dioxide and other heat - trapping gases into Earth's atmosphere: «global climate disruption.»

Launched in February 2017 with start - up support from the Rockefeller Foundation, the Global Consortium on Climate and Health Education (GCCHE) is an international forum for health professions schools committed to developing and instituting climate change and health curricula, in order to ensure a future cadre of highly trained health professionals who will be able to prepare and protect society from the harmful effects of climate disrClimate and Health Education (GCCHE) is an international forum for health professions schools committed to developing and instituting climate change and health curricula, in order to ensure a future cadre of highly trained health professionals who will be able to prepare and protect society from the harmful effects of climate disrclimate change and health curricula, in order to ensure a future cadre of highly trained health professionals who will be able to prepare and protect society from the harmful effects of climate disrclimate disruption.

Deep economic and social inequalities, environmental degradation, biodiversity loss, disruption caused by natural disasters and climate change are a litmus test for the global community.

As the respondent to a panel on climate and the press at this year's annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in Boston (I was on the panel), he urged the media, and scientists who talk to the press, to substitute «global climate disruption» for that all - too - comfortable pair of words.

First, they have not come up with any plausible alternative culprit for the disruption of global climate that is being observed, for example, a culprit other than the greenhouse - gas buildups in the atmosphere that have been measured and tied beyond doubt to human activities.

Of course, there are continual calls for other names, from James Lovelock's «global heating» to John Holdren's «global climate disruption.»

Global warming of 2 °C would leave the Earth warmer than it has been in millions of years, a disruption of climate conditions that have been stable for longer than the history of human agriculture.

Here's a link to the study, «Climate change and disruptions to global fire activity,» and click here for maps showing the projected shift in fire patterns and where the 16 models agree and disagree.

The models used to calculate a Social Cost of Carbon for use in estimating the benefits of reducing carbon emissions fall far short of including a wide range of expected damages from global climate disruption.

Over the last three decades, five IPCC «assessment reports,» dozens of computer models, scores of conferences and thousands of papers focused heavily on human fossil fuel use and carbon dioxide and greenhouse gas emissions, as being responsible for «dangerous» global warming, climate change, climate «disruption,» and almost every «extreme» weather or climate event.

If the sun is primarily responsible for observed global air temperature changes (even if heavily modulated by ocean behaviour as I contend elsewhere) then we need to know sooner rather than later otherwise a misdiagnosis of the causes of climate change could cause unimaginable disruption and hardship through the imposition of incorrect remedies.

My point is that you've been hearing about global warming, climate change, climate disruption (or whatever you prefer to call it) that «the science is settled» for years.

So I leave you to pray for global warming, or climate change, or climate disruption, or what other future event - mandated scary name you need to cling to.

So, this is BBC's message; Global Warming, sorry, Climate Change, oops, sorry again, I mean Climate Disruption is happening, and Delingpole an Moncton are just stooges for big oil.

For example, a 2006 study, led by British economist Lord Nicholas Stern, concluded that the cost of achieving a 2 °C target would be about 1 percent of global GDP, five times less than the costs of the climate disruption experienced if we fail to act.

Tagged as: Alan Carlin, American Tradition Institute, Anthony Watts, Barry Brill, Beacon Hill Institute, Bob Carter, Cato Institute, Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change, Chris Horner, climate disruption, Climatism!

What has been largely missing is a high - level appeal for action on global climate disruption that also emphasizes the risks of inaction and is couched in the science of climate change.

«The sooner global emissions start to fall, the lower the risk not only of major climate disruption, but also of economic disruption that could otherwise arise from the need for subsequent reductions at historically unprecedented rates, should near - term action remain inadequate,» says another of the report's authors, Michael Grubb, professor of international energy and climate change policy at University College London's Institute of Sustainable Resources.

Their Secure American Future Program, dedicated to raising public awareness of the threat posed by climate change and creating a movement for action, recently released Climate Security Index (5.3 MB download), a report that looks at the impacts of global climate disruption as a U.S. national security pclimate change and creating a movement for action, recently released Climate Security Index (5.3 MB download), a report that looks at the impacts of global climate disruption as a U.S. national security pClimate Security Index (5.3 MB download), a report that looks at the impacts of global climate disruption as a U.S. national security pclimate disruption as a U.S. national security problem.

They include: (1) a 35 year US delay on climate action has made the problem extraordinarily challenging to solve, (2) US greenhouse gas (ghg) emissions are more than any country responsible for rise in atmospheric concentrations to present dangerous levels, (3) US ghg emissions not only threaten the US with climate disruption but endanger many of the poorest people around the world, (4) the Obama administration's pledge to reduce ghg emissions is far short of the US fair share of safe global emissions.

> Rick Piltz > Director, Climate Science Watch > 301-807-2472 > http://www.climatesciencewatch.org > > Climate Science Watch is a sponsored project of the Government > Accountability Project, Washington, DC, dedicated to holding public > officials accountable for using climate science and related research > effectively and with integrity in responding to the challenges posed > by global climate disrClimate Science Watch > 301-807-2472 > http://www.climatesciencewatch.org > > Climate Science Watch is a sponsored project of the Government > Accountability Project, Washington, DC, dedicated to holding public > officials accountable for using climate science and related research > effectively and with integrity in responding to the challenges posed > by global climate disrClimate Science Watch is a sponsored project of the Government > Accountability Project, Washington, DC, dedicated to holding public > officials accountable for using climate science and related research > effectively and with integrity in responding to the challenges posed > by global climate disrclimate science and related research > effectively and with integrity in responding to the challenges posed > by global climate disrclimate disruption.

The 2014 National Climate Assessment provides the most comprehensive current analysis of the observed and projected consequences for the U.S. of global climate disrClimate Assessment provides the most comprehensive current analysis of the observed and projected consequences for the U.S. of global climate disrclimate disruption.

This is the same approach where the terms «climate change» and «climate disruption» are used as [erroneous] synonyms for global warming due to the emissions of greenhouse gases.

Climate disruption deniers have been claiming for years now that the global temperature has been cooling down, even though the temperature data clearly shows that it isn't.

The letter requested that NASA in general and the Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) in particular stop publishing the scientific conclusions about the human - driven causes of global climate disruption.

RE: The Over-whelming scientific Consensus on man - made CO2 caused Global - warming - 97 % of the climate scientists surveyed believe «global aver temps have increased» during the past century [So do I]-- Your quotes: How «significant it is that 84 % of climate scientists have reached a «consensus» that «human - induced warming is occurring» «--RCB- 84 % «personally believe» [implies they may NOT have actually studied this topic — IE: may NOT be experts on this particular matter] human - induced warming is occurring -LCB--... — «In 1991 only 41 % of climate scientists were very confident that industrial emissions of greenhouse gases were responsible for climate disruGlobal - warming - 97 % of the climate scientists surveyed believe «global aver temps have increased» during the past century [So do I]-- Your quotes: How «significant it is that 84 % of climate scientists have reached a «consensus» that «human - induced warming is occurring» «--RCB- 84 % «personally believe» [implies they may NOT have actually studied this topic — IE: may NOT be experts on this particular matter] human - induced warming is occurring -LCB--... — «In 1991 only 41 % of climate scientists were very confident that industrial emissions of greenhouse gases were responsible for climate disruglobal aver temps have increased» during the past century [So do I]-- Your quotes: How «significant it is that 84 % of climate scientists have reached a «consensus» that «human - induced warming is occurring» «--RCB- 84 % «personally believe» [implies they may NOT have actually studied this topic — IE: may NOT be experts on this particular matter] human - induced warming is occurring -LCB--... — «In 1991 only 41 % of climate scientists were very confident that industrial emissions of greenhouse gases were responsible for climate disruption.

The UK is poorly prepared for the impacts of global climate disruption, says the independent body that advises the UK government on climate adaptation in a report released today.

Tagged as: Alyssa Carducci, APCO International, atrazine, Bali, Cindy Baxter, climate change, climate disruption, climategate, ClimaTweet, Environment & Climate News, global warming, Google Scholar, Greenpeace, Heartland Institute, honoraria, IPCC, James Taylor, Jodi Solomon, Johns Hopkins University, Media Trackers, Media Trackers Florida, Michael Mann, MIT, National Academy of Sciences, National Science Foundation, Penn State, Philip Morris, Richard Lindzen, Scott Mandia, secondhand smoke, Sourcewatch, speaker fees, Steve Milloy, Syngenta, TASSC, The Association for Sound Science Coclimate change, climate disruption, climategate, ClimaTweet, Environment & Climate News, global warming, Google Scholar, Greenpeace, Heartland Institute, honoraria, IPCC, James Taylor, Jodi Solomon, Johns Hopkins University, Media Trackers, Media Trackers Florida, Michael Mann, MIT, National Academy of Sciences, National Science Foundation, Penn State, Philip Morris, Richard Lindzen, Scott Mandia, secondhand smoke, Sourcewatch, speaker fees, Steve Milloy, Syngenta, TASSC, The Association for Sound Science Coclimate disruption, climategate, ClimaTweet, Environment & Climate News, global warming, Google Scholar, Greenpeace, Heartland Institute, honoraria, IPCC, James Taylor, Jodi Solomon, Johns Hopkins University, Media Trackers, Media Trackers Florida, Michael Mann, MIT, National Academy of Sciences, National Science Foundation, Penn State, Philip Morris, Richard Lindzen, Scott Mandia, secondhand smoke, Sourcewatch, speaker fees, Steve Milloy, Syngenta, TASSC, The Association for Sound Science CoClimate News, global warming, Google Scholar, Greenpeace, Heartland Institute, honoraria, IPCC, James Taylor, Jodi Solomon, Johns Hopkins University, Media Trackers, Media Trackers Florida, Michael Mann, MIT, National Academy of Sciences, National Science Foundation, Penn State, Philip Morris, Richard Lindzen, Scott Mandia, secondhand smoke, Sourcewatch, speaker fees, Steve Milloy, Syngenta, TASSC, The Association for Sound Science Coalition

Climate change, global warming, climate disruption or whatever term you prefer is only a lame excuse for the world's largestClimate change, global warming, climate disruption or whatever term you prefer is only a lame excuse for the world's largestclimate disruption or whatever term you prefer is only a lame excuse for the world's largest fraud.

Extrapolated over the rest of the century, the temperature increase (aka «global warming» or «climate disruption») would be.1 °C, or one - sixth the.6 °C increase claimed for the 20th century.