The Climate Equity Reference Project is a long - term initiative to provide scholarship, tools, and analysis to advance equity as a practical means to achieve an ambitious
global climate regime.
The Climate Equity Reference Project (CERP) is a long - term initiative designed to provide scholarship, tools, and analysis to advance global climate equity — as a value in itself and as a realist path towards an ambitious
global climate regime.
In a November 21 report prepping readers for Doha, entitled, «Warming up: What to Expect From the Next Big Report on Climate Change,» The Economist puts great stock in the UN's thoroughly discredited Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and suggests that our failure to secure
a global climate regime is tantamount to «playing Russian roulette with the planet.»
Were it not for the East Anglian emails, the big Copenhagen confab of 2009 might have gotten away with plans to impose
a global climate regime across the western world.
The next, much - evolved version of GDRs was published with the snappy title of Greenhouse Development Rights: An approach to
the global climate regime that takes climate protection seriously while also preserving the right to human development.
Delegates will also discuss issues related to implementation of commitments (under the SBI - Subsidiary Body for Implementation) as well as more technical details of
the global climate regime (under SBSTA - Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice).
Does Copenhagen, then, mark not the beginning of a new
global climate regime but the end of the vision of global, negotiated climate governance?
A team of masters students and I (call us «Team China» if you will), have carefully reviewed the negotiating texts (non-papers in policy - speak) and developed a series of policy scenarios and strategic recommendations for how China can act as a leader in this talks to achieve an outcome that is optimal for both themselves and
the global climate regime.
Its key claim is that, unless the climate regime explicitly preserves such a right, developing country negotiators may quite justifiably conclude [iii] that they have more to lose than to gain from any truly earnest engagement with
a global climate regime that, after all, significantly curtails access to the energy sources and technologies that historically enabled growth in the industrialized world.
that they have more to lose than to gain from any truly earnest engagement with
a global climate regime that, after all, significantly curtails access to the energy sources and technologies that historically enabled growth in the industrialized world.
Not exact matches
In the 1990s, a wave of protest and a democratic
global climate led to the fall of autocratic
regimes and a series of elections across the African continent.
Over the past two decades, in fact, the PRC has played an increasingly pivotal role in shaping the
climate change
regime, on the one hand by influencing the
global negotiating strategy and discourse, and, on the other, by building large coalitions in support of its views.
Understanding the response of the El Niño - Southern Oscillation (ENSO) to
global warming requires quantitative data on ENSO under different
climate regimes.
The Kyoto Protocol is seen as an important first step towards a truly
global emission reduction
regime that will stabilize GHG emissions, and can provide the architecture for the future international agreement on
climate change.
development of two - way coupling between WRF and CCSM to represent the upscaled effects of
climate hot spots such as the Maritime Continent, the subtropical eastern boundary
regime, and the monsoon regions where
global climate models fail to simulate the complex processes due to feedback and scale interactions.
The document — which administration officials have neither acknowledged or rejected as authentic — has elements guaranteed to inflame folks ranging from Rush Limbaugh (the mention of efforts to «produce a
global regime to combat
climate change») to environmental groups pushing for concrete commitments on restricting greenhouse gases (a phrase implying that increasing perception of United States engagement is the goal).
At the same time, in order to ensure an effective and ambitious
global post-2012
climate regime, all major economies will need to commit to meaningful mitigation actions to be bound in the international agreement to be negotiated by the end of 2009.
In return for being part of a
global climate change
regime, developing countries want support from developed countries in the form of finance, technology and capacity building to be able to grow with lower energy and carbon intensity.
... China insists in the position to make the framework [United Nations Framework Convention on
Climate Change] the political and legal basis for the
global regime and we do not see the necessity or need to rewrite or interpret the convention.
A new
global climate - change
regime is years away, but governments around the world are leveraging voluntary tools developed by the private sector to incubate
climate - change solutions.
And that, therefore, the key to
climate protection is the establishment of a
global burden - sharing
regime in which it is not required to do so.
Admittedly, that was before a science qualification was required, but nonetheless I have been a weather and
climate enthusiast for over 60 years and have observed the differing
global weather patterns across three so called «
climate regimes».
We urgently need a new trade
regime which can help address
global challenges and tackle problems like accelerating
climate change, a broken agricultural model and loss of trust in democratic processes, rather than aggravating them.
To counter this business - as - usual scenario, the Stern Review proposes a
climate stabilization
regime in which greenhouse gas emissions would peak by 2015 and then drop 1 percent per year after that, so as to stabilize at a 550 ppm CO2e (with a significant chance that the
global average temperature increase would thereby be kept down to 3 °C).
As their «science» continues to be exposed and discredited by genuine scientists and astute researchers, we can expect their noisy chorus to get even noisier, in a desperate attempt to push through a new UN
climate regime in Paris — before taxpayers completely pull the plug on their
global - warming gravy train.
Rather, it presumes that the
climate regime that goes into effect in 2020 must focus pressure on those countries that are not doing their fair share, and it must promise to continue to do so in 2030 and beyond, even as the structure of the
global economy changes.
The 1992 United Nations Framework Convention on
Climate Change (UNFCCC), formalized at a conference in Rio de Janeiro, was in effect a treaty to create treaties, an effort to create an international
regime that would supposedly deal with the threat of
Global Warming.
That is especially important now, with the United Nations convening its member governments and dictators in New York to map out new taxes and a
global «
climate»
regime to impose on humanity under the guise of fighting warming.
They are tuned to produce a credible simulation of current
global climate statistics, but this does not guarantee reliability in future
climate regimes.
Since then, events have told a rather different story, with the U.S. waging a multi-front campaign — organizing a
global network of bilateral agreements designed to render the U.N.
climate process «irrelevant», sending out its flacks to argue that fossil technologies like «clean coal» and carbon capture are the best ways forward, insisting that the under - funded
climate secretariat separate its Kyoto Protocol accounts from those related to the Framework Convention, ruthlessly undermining all attempts to talk about, or even talk about talking about, the future of the
regime.
• The EPA could only justify their
climate regulations if — for the very first time, in any regulatory
regime — they included assumed
global impacts.
I believe we need to harmonise the
global climate change system with the trading
regime through changes in the GATT rules.
2015 is the date on everyone's minds now, as we look ahead to the conclusion of a
global deal on a new
climate regime post-2020.
As the two largest current
global emitters of greenhouse gases (GHGs), it is imperative that the United States and China work together to support effective domestic energy and
climate change programs and an effective international
climate regime.
Rather than advancing the interests of polluters through a weaker
climate policy
regime this agreement must recognize the historical responsibility of the
Global North, provide justice for the
Global South and catalyze the rapid transition away from dirty energy.
«According to most sources the range of variation between between distinct climatic
regimes is on the order of around 5 °C, and at present time the
global climate is at the high end of this range.
But our current fossil fuel - based energy
regime faces two serious challenges: depletion of the «low - hanging fruit» of
global petroleum supplies, and the need to reduce carbon emissions to avert catastrophic
climate change.
The CERP views
climate as a
global commons problem that can only be solved within a high - cooperation international
regime.
Such rainfall
regimes cover nearly half of the
global land, where either a gradual
climate change across the ecosystem thresholds or a strong perturbation due to either extreme
climate events, land use, or diseases could trigger abrupt ecosystem changes.
Similarly, human - caused
global warming is capable of pushing the
climate past a tipping point where we enter a new
climate regime, one far more disruptive than what we are used to.
The president, like his globalist cadres at the UN, is working feverishly to use
climate change to remake the political order of the globe — before the wheels come completely off the
global - warming bandwagon — so that countries and their peoples kowtow to a new international socialist
regime based out of the UN, a
regime that literally tells individuals what they can and can not do.
During the first
Global Platform for Disaster Risk Reduction held in June 2007, the Working Group agreed on three priority areas: gathering and sharing good practices in
climate risk - reduction; providing policy guidance to UNFCCC processes on the post-2012
climate change
regime; and developing methods for reducing the carbon footprint of disaster risk reduction activities.
Reinforce the perception that the US is constructively engaged in UN negotiations in an effort to produce a
global regime to combat
climate change.
Multi-decadal
regime shift — chaotic — unpredictable — involving abrupt shifts in ocean and atmospheric circulation — show the dynamical mechanism at the core of
climate on a
global scale.
It looks as though
global warming has been doing much more than just alter
climate regimes and physical environments: it's actually been shifting seasons forward as well.
Williams, K.D., and G. Tselioudis, 2007: GCM intercomparison of
global cloud
regimes: Present - day evaluation and
climate change response.
We argued that with Kyoto's ratification carbon would actually be priced, that new principles for the protection of the
global commons would be established, and that the structures necessary to eventually strengthen the
climate regime would be put into place.
Despite governments squandering hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars per year on «
climate» schemes, much of the public sees through the charade — so much so that the UN and its power - hungry «member states» understand that their radical dream of a
global «
climate»
regime controlling every facet of human existence is on the verge of slipping out of reach.
According to Christiana Figueres, the «executive secretary of the UN Framework Convention on
Climate Change,» the communist
regime in Beijing, famous for forced abortions and mass murder, is «doing it right» when it comes to fighting alleged
global warming.
As The New American has been reporting since last year, the UN and its member governments and dictatorships are frantically hoping to secure a planetary «
climate»
regime next year at a
global - warming summit in Paris.