Sentences with phrase «global consensus needed»

So is a top - down, global consensus needed to achieve a good Anthropocene?

Not exact matches

The general consensus among economists is that crude oil prices need to climb dramatically higher before threatening the global recovery.

At the Oslo panel there was a consensus that a true global opportunity needs to include a business case.

A consensus on the need for FTAAP to defend and facilitate open and deeper economic ties has evolved amid the recession and threats of global protectionism.

Its appeal is complex, drawing on belief in anthropogenic global warming and trust in the «scientific consensus» behind it; the Great Recession and a protective reaction to rapid social change; a basic need for the concrete, local, and personal; the waning of religious observance; peer pressure, star power, money, and more.

So in 1991, a consensus was reached on the need for a global secretariat to coordinate collective efforts.

With a growing consensus in the global health community that Hepatitis C (HCV) could be eliminated, a new report from the O'Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law at Georgetown University highlights a key missing element needed to achieving complete eliminationâ $ «adequate surveillance and monitoringâ $ «and explains how modest investments would improve lives and save global health community that Hepatitis C (HCV) could be eliminated, a new report from the O'Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law at Georgetown University highlights a key missing element needed to achieving complete eliminationâ $ «adequate surveillance and monitoringâ $ «and explains how modest investments would improve lives and save Global Health Law at Georgetown University highlights a key missing element needed to achieving complete eliminationâ $ «adequate surveillance and monitoringâ $ «and explains how modest investments would improve lives and save money.

Whether we are considering the importance of advancing innovation to business organizations or higher education research, people who are involved in these endeavors on the front lines need a vision for the future of eLearning that is built on a strong global consensus.

Clearly, there is a need to come to a global consensus on what concrete actions we need to consider in overcoming these harmful and tragic boundaries.

The SDGs are a challenge of global governance that need planetary consensus and this requires that all people become aware of the political and economic illusion of unlimited growth.

But for those of us who follow Hansen, Spratt, Monbiot, and many others in the tail of a much more serious climate change story: non-linear, with positive feedbacks, tipping points, time lags and thresholds, we need a much more robust and focused scientific consensus now, without waiting years for the next IPCC reports, in time to win the crucial 08 election because the solution must be now, global and America must be a leader.

I accept there is something approaching a scientific consensus that global warming is real and should be addressed urgently, but contributions wishing to radically change the figures do need to consider credibility issues of this kind.

In particular, BECI can play a critical role in catalyzing the additional multidisciplinary academic work around carbon removal needed to address the growing scientific consensus (from institutions, such as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the National Research Council, and the Global Carbon Project) that preventing further climate change likely requires carbon removal in addition to reductions in carbon emissions.

While the guests varied on the feasibility of global governance of long - term deployment, there was a consensus that new governance structures are needed to manage research and to continue to debate questions of ethics, political consequences, and material risk.

Global warming believers need only to counter dry recitations of skeptic science material with assertions about the numbers of «IPCC scientists», declare this to be the settled consensus opinion, then claim there is leaked memo evidence proving skeptics are paid industry money to «reposition global warming as theory rather than fact» — hoodwink the public, in other Global warming believers need only to counter dry recitations of skeptic science material with assertions about the numbers of «IPCC scientists», declare this to be the settled consensus opinion, then claim there is leaked memo evidence proving skeptics are paid industry money to «reposition global warming as theory rather than fact» — hoodwink the public, in other global warming as theory rather than fact» — hoodwink the public, in other words.

One need only look at the essay written by Naomi Oreskes Undeniable Global Warming to believe that most climate researchers have lined up and say they know everything and have reached a consensus.

Mr McIntyre is exactly right: If we take Big Climate at their word that the entire global economy needs massive re-orientation on a scale never before contemplated, it will require the largest societal consensus â $ «left and right and center, in America, in Canada, in Britain, in Europe... Yet all Big Climate does is retreat ever deeper into its shrinking echo chamber and compile ever longer lists of people who are beyond the pale â $ «Professor Curry, Professor Christy, Professor Bengtsson, Professor Pielke, Professor Soon, Lord Lawson, the Bishop of Chester, the winner of the 1973 Nobel Prize in Physics, the winner of the 1998 Nobel Prize in Physics... It might be quicker for Mann, Trenberth, Gavin Schmidt and the other climate enforcers to make a short list of those to whom they are prepared to grant a say in the future of the planet.

-- should be giving any kind of publicity to those sort of views... But it is effectively BBC policy, enthusiastically carried out by the BBC environment correspondents, that those views should not be heard — witness the BBC statement last year that «BBC News currently takes the view that their reporting needs to be calibrated to take into account the scientific consensus that global warming is man - made.»

And when the hands of Big Government play a part in molding the consensus, or in this case Big Global Government, the peer - to - peer review network and the undermedia will play the unavoidable role of getting to the truth — a truth desperately needed when crafting policy that will affect every living human and their offspring.

The thrust of Mankiw's op - ed, One Answer to Global Warming: A New Tax, is that there is a «broad consensus» among «policy wonks» that «if we want to reduce global emissions of carbon, we need a global carboGlobal Warming: A New Tax, is that there is a «broad consensus» among «policy wonks» that «if we want to reduce global emissions of carbon, we need a global carboglobal emissions of carbon, we need a global carboglobal carbon tax.

«There's a consensus that we need to spend the money in order to prove or disprove this,» says a senior staffer on the House Select Committee for Energy Independence and Global Warming.

Given the importance of the scientific consensus on human - caused global warming in peoples» decisions whether to support action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and the public lack of awareness of the consensus, we need to make people aware of these results.

«The authors write that North Pacific Decadal Variability (NPDV) «is a key component in predictability studies of both regional and global climate change,»... they emphasize that given the links between both the PDO and the NPGO with global climate, the accurate characterization and the degree of predictability of these two modes in coupled climate models is an important «open question in climate dynamics» that needs to be addressed... report that model - derived «temporal and spatial statistics of the North Pacific Ocean modes exhibit significant discrepancies from observations in their twentieth - century climate... conclude that «for implications on future climate change, the coupled climate models show no consensus on projected future changes in frequency of either the first or second leading pattern of North Pacific SST anomalies,» and they say that «the lack of a consensus in changes in either mode also affects confidence in projected changes in the overlying atmospheric circulation.»»

Although there has been a scientific consensus on global warming, some aren't sure it's something we need to worry about.

There's mostly consensus on what's causing global warming (we are), as well as how quickly we need to work to slow it down (very quickly).

This latest report was made at the conclusion of these negotiations during which almost no progress was made in defining equity under UNFCCC by the Ad Hoc Working Group on Durban Platform For Enhanced Action (ADP), a mechanism under the UNFCCC that seeks to achieve a adequate global climate agreement, despite a growing consensus among most observers of the UNFCCC negotiations that nations need to align their emissions reductions commitments to levels required of them by equity and justice if the world is going to prevent extremely dangerous climate change.

Notwithstanding the scientific consensus on global warming, a few scientists — who probably not coincidently receive energy - industry funding — continue to question if the Earth's temperature is rising and question the need for action.

You need to take the carbon quiz to learn a few basics especially if you are a global warming believer because all science necessarily requires informed skepticism to counterbalance anything that starts becoming theoretical consensus which happens to be a political term not a scientific one.

The science of catastrophic man - caused global warming is settled, no need to pay attention to what skeptic climate scientists say about the science or its political angles, such as the «97 % consensus» because they are paid illicit industry money to lie....

But it is effectively BBC policy, enthusiastically carried out by the BBC environment correspondents, that those views should not be heard — witness the BBC statement last year that «BBC News currently takes the view that their reporting needs to be calibrated to take into account the scientific consensus that global warming is man - made».

Raiden brings nearly instant transactions of ERC20 tokens without the regular need for global blockchain consensus.