Sentences with phrase «global conspiracy theories»

Not exact matches

Points 2 and 3 might lead to their not believing in global warming, but when faced by such an overwhelming majority of scientist who believe it, it seems (to me) almost like a conspiracy theory to deny it.

Half of the 26 candidates are independents of various kinds, including Jill Saward - a sexual abuse campaigner who believes CCTV and DNA databases are needed - and David Icke - campaigning on his conspiracy theories about a global elite.

The authors suggest there is a higher - order process at work that they call global coherence that overrules local contradictions: «Someone who believes in a significant number of conspiracy theories would naturally begin to see authorities as fundamentally deceptive, and new conspiracy theories would seem more plausible in light of that belief.»

Likewise, conservatives with higher news media literacy were less likely to believe five conspiracy theories commonly associated with conservatives — among them that Barack Obama was not born in the U.S., that global warming is a hoax, and that the 2010 health care law authorized government panels to make end - of - life decisions for people on Medicare.

The critical responses I have received can largely be categorized into two camps: those who feel that the article labels every conspiracy theorist as mentally ill and those who feel that it is unfair to group skepticism toward global warming with other «crazy» conspiracy theories such as aliens and Area 51.

Yet another Google - funded organization is out promoting conspiracy theories about the threat of man - made global warming.

In the chaos, conspiracy theories rage about a foreign cyberattack — that this might be the first shockwave of a colossal global shift in power — but even this becomes unimportant as Mike and his family struggle for survival in the wintry tomb of a doomed New York.

With reworked stories and imagined realities, ideas and tropes from science fiction, mixed with conspiracy theories and an interest in fictional restaging, the exhibition illustrates differing global perspectives of the moon and reworks its prevailing image on our collective imagination.

There is nothing «skeptical» about rejecting the overwhelming scientific evidence of ongoing, dangerous anthropogenic global warming while perpetrating and promoting falsehoods, distortions, sophistry and conspiracy theories, which is what WUWT is all about.

I have no idea what you are referring to, except perhaps that the rote regurgitation of long - since and many - times - over debunked denialist nonsense is mercifully (and no doubt laboriously) deleted by the RC moderators — unlike every other open blog on the Internet where any attempt to discuss the science of anthropogenic global warming is quickly drowned out by a torrent of pseudoscience, conspiracy theories, blatant falsehoods, and hate speech against climate scientists.

That said, he had a slide titled: «Global warming is real,» which he admitted, but then talked about the data adjustment conspiracy theory.

I have read many posts at Climate etc. that postulate a vast left - wing, socialist, eco-Nazi, climate scientists conspiracy intended to use the theory that GW is 90 % likely to be A as a cover for hidden intentions to retard global economic growth and to punish the U.S. for its evil capitalistic ways.

Given the global economic implications of carbon dioxide emission mitigation and the fact that geopolitical strategising tends not to be shared with the public at large, it seems inevitable that any attempt to answer your question will be denounced as a conspiracy theory.

«Conspiracy theory... oil - and - coal - company global - warming denialist constituency..

It needs some imagination to believe there is a global conspiracy to make money out of the climate change / global warming theory.

Initially I assumed that they were just another high - level environmental think - tank and dismissed the conspiracy theories found on many website claiming that the CoR is a group of global elitists attempting to impose some kind of one world government.

Senator Inhofe called into Mike Huckabee's radio show to discuss conspiracy theories on global warming.

Yet the only thing which remotely looks like evidence to confirm this conspiracy is a worthless set of memos supposedly leaked out of the Western Fuels Association having the strategy to «reposition global warming as theory rather than fact.»

The conspiracy - effect: Exposure to conspiracy theories (about global warming) decreases pro-social behaviour and science acceptance.

I use it regularly to describe people, that when faced with data that no longer supports their own biased point of view, will turn to global cover - up conspiracy theories in order to preserve their own self - deception.

Well, If you take the success of the EU as being a model for a future UN global administration, then we don't have too much to fear regarding this conspiracy theory.

Last month, a man by the name of Jagadish Shukla (along with several other scientists) sent a letter to the President and Attorney General Loretta Lynch, demanding that RICO charges — that is, «racketeering, influenced and corrupt organization» charges — be brought against so - called «climate deniers,» as though those who disagree with the theory that global climate change is inherently man made and undeniably catastrophic, were joined together in a conspiracy that amounts to organized crime.

CRU houses the most world's most extensive data base on atmospheric temperatures and the e-mails exposed blatant exaggerations of the warming data, possible illegal destruction of evidence, and conspiracy to manipulate or suppress data not supporting of the man - made Global Warming theory.

Obviously this conspiracy theory is utterly absurd, and is easily disproven by simply examining the IPCC Third Assessment Report (TAR) published in 2001, two years before Mörner's accusation of falsified sea level data, which shows an approximately 10 to 15 mm rise in average global sea level from 1993 to 1998 (Figure 3).

This is powerful, though not really news, for those unaware of the aggressiveness and obstinate cultivation of ignorance via conspiracy theory of the denial campaign: «Global warming deniers guilty of attack on science»

Jesse Ventura's show «Conspiracy Theory» on Tru TV covers Global Warming.

Part of the backlash against that paper by self - described global warming skeptics included further conspiracy theories about the paper.

From where I sit, the «conspiracy theory» line — that climate change scientists apparently are so well armed financially they can spearhead such a major and global conspiracy, where as the poor ol Sultan of Omar has to sit weeping on his piles of billions, wringing his hands in impotency — seems a little hilarious.

Essentially Lewandowsky wrote a paper about conspiracy theories around the denial of global warming.

The tobacco industry was caught red - handed with a secret memo strategy saying «doubt was their product ``; catch skeptic climate scientists in a similar conspiracy with Big Coal & Oil where the strategy is to «reposition global warming as theory rather than fact» and you'll have the public so outraged that they will never trust a word those skeptics have to say.

I'm sure temperature changes, weather changes... speaking of, why don't we ever hear of the apparent but controversial weather manipulation from such things as geoengineering (supposedly to combat global warming but dismissed as conspiracy theory) or HAARP which has often been the subject of the same theorists that think it's possible to alter the weather..

Mark Kleiman has posted an article there called «Global - warming denialism as a conspiracy theory.»

Otherwise wild conspiracy theories may erupt, perhaps one which notices how a UN report - writing program keeps yielding conclusions that lead to a UN-run program of global control with greatly expanded UN powers.

One largely unremarked aspect of global - warming denialism -LSB-...] is that it amounts to a conspiracy theory.

Commenting on criticism of the Lavoisier Group by Clive Hamilton, the Cooler Heads Coalition notes that «Hamilton accuses the Lavoisier Group of painting the UN's global warming negotiations as «an elaborate conspiracy in which hundreds of climate scientists have twisted their results to support the climate change theory in order to protect their research funding» and adds, «Sounds plausible to us.»

A global warming conspiracy theory invokes claims that the scientific consensus on global warming is based on conspiracies to produce manipulated data or suppress dissent.

In a piece headed Crichton's conspiracy theory, Harold Evans described Crichton's theory as being «in the paranoid political style identified by the renowned historian Richard Hofstadter,» and went on to suggest that «if you happen to be in the market for a conspiracy theory today, there's a rather more credible one documented by the pressure group Greenpeace,» namely the funding by ExxonMobil of groups opposed to the theory of global warming.

Sceptics are still out there [with particular commentary on political motivations and the conspiracy theory claims of a great global scam]

In reality, the victims of Fox News who turn red - faced with rage and begin spouting crackpot conspiracy theories about the IPCC at the mere mention of «Al Gore» are actually a miniscule minority compared to «global» public opinion.

We Americans have garnered ourselves quite a little reputation as foot - dragging obstructionists when it comes to global warming; the arctic is melting, our crops are drying out, the problem is staring us in the face, the rational world is moving to act, and our politicians and pundits blather on about sunspots and debunked conspiracy theories.

Russia Today is an uncritical purveyor of conspiracy theories and frequently interviews American and British conspiracists who claim that global warming is a «hoax,» too.

According to «The Great Global Warming Swindle», produced by Martin Durkin and broadcast on the UK Channel 4, human - triggered climate change is merely a conspiracy theory, designed by over 2000 climate scientists, the world's leading climate research organizations and the Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change to prevent the world's poor nations from developing.

From global warming to 9/11, Shakespeare to Elvis, Diana to JFK, peak oil to Roswell, conspiracy theories abound.

Entertaining how the NRDC played a role of some sort with one of the global warming nuisance lawsuits, the Connecticut v American Electric Power, while another of those global warming nuisance lawsuits, Comer v. Murphy Oil had wording within its documents stating «The API [American Petroleum Institute] and other Oil Company Defendants have engaged in concerted financial activity — far in excess of $ 1 million — in furtherance of a tortious civil conspiracy to «reposition global warming as theory rather than fact» — details I described in my previous blog post.

Another problem with CC's theory is it requires that you believe simultaneously that a) Mercer / Putin et al are so brilliant and powerful they could orchestrate this global conspiracy AND b) it fell apart because they're so dumb they entrusted the Brexit arm of it to Banks and Wigmore who promptly blabbed the whole dastardly scheme on the record to CC by mistake.