Sentences with phrase «global cooling predictions»

-- Round Up of Current Global Cooling predictions — Climate Depot Exclusive Report

So global cooling predictions in the 70's amounted to media hype over essentially a single study.

So global cooling predictions in the 70s amounted to media and a handful of peer reviewed studies.

-- August 25, 2008 — More Global COOLING Predictions: Meteorologist predicts «global climate will become similar to the colder temperatures experienced during the 1800s» — Excerpt: Global temperatures have cooled during the past 12 months.

One such post quoting Don Easterbrook (of failed global cooling prediction fame) began with the following objection:

Not exact matches

People who claim we can stop worrying about global warming on the basis of a cooler year or a cooler decade — or just on questionable predictions of cooling — are as naive as a child mistaking a falling tide, or a spring low tide, for a real long - term fall in sea level.

Predictions of global cooling in the short term are partly based on the idea that sea surface temperatures will fall in the northern Atlantic, due to slow, irregular swings in conditions known as the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation.

Forecasts have backed off predictions of a La Niña this fall; La Niña tends to cool global temperatures

My prediction is the current global cooling trend will reverse around mid-2008 when La Niña subsides.

Those predictions clearly suggest an annual global temperature record in 2016 and a (relative) cooling in 2017, all while the long - term upward trends continue.

The fact that the hindcasts with their method perform worse than a standard IPCC scenario, the number of failed previous cooling predictions, the negative skill in the Gulf Stream and deep - water formation regions... should these not have cautioned them against going to the media to forecast a pause in global warming?

I'll hazard a prediction for the global surface temperature for 2009 CE: one of the cooler years this century (2000 CE onwards) and in the top 12 overall.

If, for example, Big CO2 Inc. wanted to put a billion dollars down on global cooling, 2 things would happen — the web would be full of «sign up and take some money from Big CO2 Inc.» emails, and, more importantly, some of the people who think it's a slam dunk for global warming might temper their predictions just a bit because some clown put so much money down on the opposite outcome.

My father is somewhat of a climate «sceptic» and insists that the prediction of 0.3 C cooling is based only on solar irradiance and does not take into account increased cloud cover caused by low sun activity (he beleives that we are going to be facing extreme global cooling over the next few decades).

Every now and again, the myth that «we shouldn't believe global warming predictions now, because in the 1970's they were predicting an ice age and / or cooling» surfaces.

Dr. Easterbrook spoke of his studies of solar activity and ocean cycles and his prediction that a decades - long global cooling spell was coming, deeper than the one in the middle of the 20th century.

if it's any consolation, the recent predictions discussed on this blog of a «pause» in northern hemisphere global warming — and, indeed, cooling in the u.s. — may signal the end of the line for the california wine growers.

In 2008, there was substantial coverage — including by me (print, blog)-- of a provocative paper in Nature attempting a short - term prediction that global warming would stop for awhile, driven mainly by cooling around the North Atlantic.

We use the global cooling and drying of the atmosphere that was observed after the eruption of Mount Pinatubo to test model predictions of the climate feedback from water vapor.

Global temperature has in recent years increased more slowly than before, but this is within the normal natural variability that always exists, and also within the range of predictions by climate models — even despite some cool forcing factors such as the deep solar minimum not included in the models.

That was certainly the case in Santa Fe, where there were individuals (e.g. Don Easterbrook) who were going on record with predictions of global cooling.

Now, having seemingly forgotten their dire predictions of catastrophic global cooling, they are preaching catastrophic global warming.

By Gene J. Koprowski Contrary to the commonly held scientific conclusion that the Earth is getting warmer, a scientist who has written more than 150 peer - reviewed papers has unveiled evidence for his prediction that global cooling is coming soon.

At the recent scandal - plagued Heartland climate conference, Don Easterbrook gave a presentation in which he discussed his previous predictions of global cooling.

«To summarize - Using the 60 and 1000 year quasi repetitive patterns in conjunction with the solar data leads straightforwardly to the following reasonable predictions for Global SSTs 1 Continued modest cooling until a more significant temperature drop at about 2016 - 17 2 Possible unusual cold snap 2021 - 22 3 Built in cooling trend until at least 2024 4 Temperature Hadsst3 moving average anomaly 2035 — 0.15 5Temperature Hadsst3 moving average anomaly 2100 — 0.5 6 General Conclusion — by 2100 all the 20th century temperature rise will have been reversed, 7 By 2650 earth could possibly be back to the depths of the little ice age.

I recall (I was a sentient being at the time; — RRB - predictions published in the popular press of global cooling.

A couple of years ago, I was caused to do some research on the subject, and discovered that the predictions of global cooling at the time were not really based on science, but on the belief that, given the believed time frames for heating and cooling, «we were overdue for a cooling phase.»

How is David Evan's prediction of global cooling going?

Atmospheric Scientist Tennekes: «Sun may cause some cooling» — «No evidence at all for catastrophic global warming» — July 14, 2008 (By Atmospheric scientist Dr. Hendrik Tennekes, a scientific pioneer in the development of numerical weather prediction and former director of research at The Netherlands» Royal National Meteorological Institute.)

Its hard to take climate model predictions seriously when such small errors can project twice the global warming — OR global cooling!

However, calling it by its proper name, carbon fertilization, would be like discussing global warming predictions while using the specific term CAGW rather than «climate change» and so admitting that global cooling is contradictory: not sufficiently dishonest.

It's pretty hard to «overinterpret» a 10 + year stop in global warming (actual slight cooling instead), despite unabated human GHG emissions and concentrations reaching record levels, plus IPCC model - based predictions of 0.2 C per decade warming.

To point out just a couple of things: — oceans warming slower (or cooling slower) than lands on long - time trends is absolutely normal, because water is more difficult both to warm or to cool (I mean, we require both a bigger heat flow and more time); at the contrary, I see as a non-sense theory (made by some serrist, but don't know who) that oceans are storing up heat, and that suddenly they will release such heat as a positive feedback: or the water warms than no heat can be considered ad «stored» (we have no phase change inside oceans, so no latent heat) or oceans begin to release heat but in the same time they have to cool (because they are losing heat); so, I don't feel strange that in last years land temperatures for some series (NCDC and GISS) can be heating up while oceans are slightly cooling, but I feel strange that they are heating up so much to reverse global trend from slightly negative / stable to slightly positive; but, in the end, all this is not an evidence that lands» warming is led by UHI (but, this effect, I would not exclude it from having a small part in temperature trends for some regional area, but just small); both because, as writtend, it is normal to have waters warming slower than lands, and because lands» temperatures are often measured in a not so precise way (despite they continue to give us a global uncertainity in TT values which is barely the instrumental's one)-- but, to point out, HadCRU and MSU of last years (I mean always 2002 - 2006) follow much better waters» temperatures trend; — metropolis and larger cities temperature trends actually show an increase in UHI effect, but I think the sites are few, and the covered area is very small worldwide, so the global effect is very poor (but it still can be sensible for regional effects); but I would not run out a small warming trend for airport measurements due mainly to three things: increasing jet planes traffic, enlarging airports (then more buildings and more asphalt — if you follow motor sports, or simply live in a town / city, you will know how easy they get very warmer than air during day, and how much it can slow night - time cooling) and overall having airports nearer to cities (if not becoming an area inside the city after some decade of hurban growth, e.g. Milan - Linate); — I found no point about UHI in towns and villages; you will tell me they are not large cities; but, in comparison with 20-40-60 years ago when they were «countryside», many small towns and villages have become part of larger hurban areas (at least in Europe and Asia) so examining just larger cities would not be enough in my opinion to get a full view of UHI effect (still remembering that it has a small global effect: we can say many matters are due to UHI instead of GW, maybe even that a small part of measured GW is due to UHI, and that GW measurements are not so precise to make us able to make good analisyses and predictions, but not that GW is due to UHI).

Amazingly, over the shorter term, the global warming predictions for the U.S. breadbasket have been even worse, in fact, astoundingly atrocious - instead of warming, growing areas have cooled considerably.

Whether it's global warming, cooling, the ozone hole, acid rain, or any of the other myriad climate doomsday predictions (which NEVER come true) the proposed «solution» is always the same: More money and more power for politicians, and higher taxes and less freedom for ordinary people.

Dire predictions for both global cooling and global warming have been found to be grossly inaccurate.

Similarly, will scientists be believed anymore after decades of failed predictions regarding overpopulation, global crop failures, global cooling, global warming, etc.?

Until there is a firm prediction about when this human caused global warming will end the current global cooling of 0.2 °C / century as depicted on the HadCRUT3 global temperature dataset since 2002; the only ones who can be called deniers are those who deny the world of the truth about global temperatures.

With a declining solar intensity suggesting a further decline in AMOC and an increase in upwelling in the Pacific — the prediction is that the next global climate shift — due in a 2018 - 2028 window — will be to yet cooler conditions.

The prediction is that the next global climate shift — due in a 2018 - 2028 window — will be to yet cooler conditions.

I have been on topic, of global cooling, and for the period in question, from the start of my first comment here, and have shown where the information which I have provided, makes references to, or uses the words ice age - call that «prediction» if you will, but lets not turn this into word semantics.

The term ice age prediction, is simply alluding to the fact or science which showed global cooling - and if the globe continues to cool, then it could very well be expected, that there may be a return to another ice age.

Cooling in the next global climate shift — due in a 2018 - 2028 window — is a prediction.

Those predictions clearly suggest an annual global temperature record in 2016 and a (relative) cooling in 2017, all while the long - term upward trends continue.

Except that it's not a prediction: it was already happening, and it is known that a consequence of La Nina is cooler global temperatures.

By 1973, and the «global cooling» scare, it was in full swing, with predictions of the imminent collapse of the world within ten to twenty years, exacerbated by the impacts of a nuclear winter.

The IPCC * itself * acknowledges that there has been no such warming now for the last 16 - 17 years; that no dramatic imminent change is seen to that for the next couple of years at least; that the previous spell of 15 years or so was precisely the duration of warming that underlay so much of the evidence cited for its alarms of the long and terrible global trend if forecast; that not a single model the IPCC had or has seems to have come even close to predicting what we've now seen; that the IPCC can only suggest possible explanations for all this so logically meaning it can have no reason to believe that whatever is causing it isn't going to continue forever; that more and more studies are coming in attributing global temperatures not to CO2 but instead other things such as solar fluctuations; that a number of predictions are now coming in that in fact say we are now in for a lengthy period of * cooling.

«To summarize — Using the 60 and 1000 year quasi repetitive patterns in conjunction with the solar data leads straightforwardly to the following reasonable predictions for Global SSTs 1 Continued modest cooling until a more significant temperature drop at about 2016 - 17 2 Possible unusual cold snap 2021 - 22 3 Built in cooling trend until at least 2024 4 Temperature Hadsst3 moving average anomaly 2035 minus 0.15 degrees 5Temperature Hadsst3 moving average anomaly 2100 minus 0.5 degrees 6 General Conclusion — by 2100 all the 20th century temperature rise will have been reversed, 7 By 2650 earth could possibly be back to the depths of the little ice age.

This climate modeling capability made it possible to perform a real - time climate change prediction (verified by subsequent observations) of the global cooling and stratospheric heating (and return to normal) following to the 1991 Pinatubo volcanic eruption.

Hurricane Sandy - Extreme Events and Global Cooling 11/18/12 Global Cooling Climate and Weather Forecasting 1/22/13 Global Cooling Timing and Amount 2/18/13 Its the Sun Stupid — the Minor Significance of CO2 4/2/13 Global Cooling Methods and Testable Decadal Predictions.