That complexity led the session's chair — John Schellnhuber, from the UK's Tyndall Centre for Climatic Research, to warn that setting precise
global danger levels may be «mission impossible».
Not exact matches
The online realtime multiplayer game of chaotic physics - based combat, brute evolution, crazy powerups and unlockable costumes - all within cartoon - themed
levels of
danger with daily
global and regional leaderboards!
This is the difference between countries» pledged commitments to reduce emissions of heat - trapping greenhouse gases after 2020 and scientifically calculated trajectories giving good odds of keeping
global warming below the threshold for
danger countries pledged to try to avoid in climate talks in 2010 (to «hold the increase in
global average temperature below 2 °C above pre-industrial
levels»).
Here are some possible choices — in order of increasing sophistication: * All (or most) scientists agree (the principal Gore argument) * The 20th century is the warmest in 1000 years (the «hockeystick» argument) * Glaciers are melting, sea ice is shrinking, polar bears are in
danger, etc * Correlation — both CO2 and temperature are increasing * Sea
levels are rising * Models using both natural and human forcing accurately reproduce the detailed behavior of 20th century
global temperature * Modeled and observed PATTERNS of temperature trends («fingerprints») of the past 30 years agree
Sea -
level rise is a long - term
danger of
global warming.
The low - lying Pacific Island country of Kiribati is one of many micro-nations in
danger of serious damage and even inundation from rising sea
levels caused by melting polar ice and increasingly turbulent
global weather.
The primary
danger from
global warming was supposed to be the sea
level rise from melting ice caps but this hasn't occurred either and satellite measurements show that the rate of sea
level rise has in fact decreased in 2004 to 0.37 mm / year in the Atlantic and 0.15 mm / year in the Pacific.
«Even today, with the
global warming
danger level at a critical phase, Defendants continue to engage in massive fossil fuel production and execute long - term business plans to continue and even expand their fossil fuel production for decades into the future.»
One characterisation of the IPCC is that it is politically motivated to exaggerate the
dangers of
global warming and the
level of human influence on climate change.
In addition to rising temperatures, the report discussed a variety of «other possible effects of an increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide», including melting of the Antarctic ice cap, rise of sea
level, warming of sea water, increased acidity of fresh waters (which also applies to the
danger of ocean acidification,
global warming's evil twin), and an increase in plant photosynthesis.
They are talking about the
dangers of anthropogenic
global warming, but include the sea
level rise from all warming effects, most of which occured long before we were burning fossil fuels at anywhere near current rates.
Scientists will warn this week that rising sea
levels, triggered by
global warming, pose a far greater
danger to the planet than previously estimated.
Given even larger underestimations in sea
level rise and Arctic ice disappearance I assume you're point is that climate scientists have been overly cautious about the
dangers of
global warming.
Complaints focus on the environmental impacts of mountaintop removal mining, the projected high costs of carbon capture and storage, the human health
dangers of large, rapid releases of carbon dioxide, the
global warming risk posed by small
levels leakage over long periods, increases in coal mining needed to run scrubbers as well as carbon capture and storage systems.
«Still, with this somewhat unique bid, 50 % lower than Acwa Power's winning bid in the previous phase II submitted just 18 months ago, the
danger arises that Dubai's tender raises
global expectations of the cost of solar to a
level that can not be quite matched elsewhere, making the industry get somewhat ahead of itself.»
The Guardian: «Given that sea
level has risen faster than predicted, if you're arguing against the
dangers posed by
global warming, sea
level is a poor choice.»
The
dangers of attributing sea
level rise and Hurricane Sandy to
global warming to one side, it is these claims much more than his «science advocacy» which reveal Gavin's values.
«From a
global perspective, the
level of warming is about to enter the
danger zone for coral reefs and it is certainly arguable that it is already too late for some of these systems to «adapt naturally,»» said Michael Oppenheimer, a professor of geosciences and international affairs at Princeton University.
, he says the idea that 2015 was the year in which
global average temperatures passed the 1 °C milestone, halfway to the
danger level, is mistaken.
and has spoken extensively in a wide range of forums to explain the environmental
dangers we face on a
global level.
Instead of committing ourselves to 2.9 °C warming above pre-industrial
levels as in business as usual, we're only committed to 2 °C, which keeps us right at the cusp of the
global warming «
danger limit.»