I assume you mean global civilization's and or economic and political collapse and that you have at least a smidgen of hope that humanity might still come to it's senses and and implement radical paradigm change to avoid
global ecological collapse.
Not exact matches
An elegiac commemoration of habitat loss and
ecological collapse, her digital artwork harnesses the power of the internet to spread awareness of imminent threats to
global biodiversity.
Third, most of our top rank experts and the people in many places, the ones who refer to each other as «the brightest and the best» -LCB- and point to each other as the «smartest guy in the room» -RCB-, appear not to rejected adequate ways of communicating to the family of humanity about what people somehow need to hear, see and understand: the rapacious dissipation of Earth's limited resources, the relentless degradation of the planet's environment, and the approaching destruction of the Earth as a fit place for human habitation by the human species, when taken together, appear to be proceeding at breakneck speed toward the precipitation of a catastrophic
ecological wreckage of some sort unless, of course, the world's colossal, ever expanding, artificially designed, manmade
global political economy continues to speed headlong toward the monolithic «wall» called «unsustainability» at which point the runaway economy crashes before Earth's ecology is
collapsed.
For example, you may have heard that a bunch of scientists produced a landmark report that concludes the earth is destined for
ecological collapse, unless
global population and consumption rates are restrained.
The
global ecological crisis sprang forth full - blown at roughly the same historical moment that
global capital — welcoming the
collapse of the Soviet bloc and the decay of the revolutionary process in China — was claiming a definitive victory over socialism.
From the ubiquity of assertions one sees that it is the poor and over-population that is causing the disaster, I suspect that the Right intend to make the
global poor pay for the
ecological collapse, while continuing their reedy excessive consumption as long as possible.
When you consider all the aspects of our
global ecological overshoot, the logical and inevitable conclusion is that we can't have nothing resembling our economy if we want to prevent
collapse, and whoever says otherwise pretty much has no idea what he's talking about.