As Jaccard noted,
global effects like climate change are just local effects that occur everywhere.
But what remains is the idea of
global effects like weather and rampaging monsters.
Not exact matches
Companies
like U.S. biotech giant Gilead and the U.K.'s GlaxoSmithKline (the majority stakeholder in
global HIV partnership ViiV Healthcare) have developed drugs that drastically lower the chance of HIV infection — or which simply lower the number of drugs you have to take to treat it, consequently curbing the risk of toxic side
effects while simplifying medical regimens.
Like most great inventions, the airplane has created a butterfly
effect that has impacted many of the most historic events in the last century — everything from warfare, to geographic distribution of populations, to commerce and trade and the
global exchange of information.
The
global temperature average has increased by 1.4 degrees F, which may not seem
like a lot, but the
effects of the increase are being seen and felt globally.
With headaches
like natural disasters, rising wages in China, and a financial domino
effect gripping economies around the world — not to mention recession - induced protectionism
like U.S. President Barack Obama's jobs bills with their Buy American clauses — have we reached the limits of the
global integration that has propelled the world economy since the end of the Cold War?
There are new offerings,
like Calvert Foundation's Women Investing in Women Initiative for fixed income and the PAX Ellevate
Global Women's Index Fund or Morgan Stanley's Parity Portfolio for public equities, and initiatives
like The Women
Effect bringing a new community together to accelerate deployment of interested capital into gender - lens investment opportunities.
Matthias MÃ 1/4 ller, a visual
effects producer and SendOwl customer, suggests that bitcoin has a valuable role to play in the
global economy, â $ œI think cryptocurrencies
like bitcoin can help to bring back some variety and freedom to the way we run our economyâ $ ¦.
I would also
like to see an article on how Santa Clause would deal with international relations, and perhaps a piece on how unicorn farts
effect global warming.
Because, if it were «affected», then it would be more
like «having an affect on» on or «contributing to», whereas «
effected» you would be saying the subject (man) caused or implemented or brought about the object (
global climate).
Probably far too complicated for this site, but the «costs» entirely disregards long - term costs - pollution, health problems (
like coal extraction workers), and, obviously, the trillions in expected expenses from
global warming
effects, both responding to and trying to mitigate.
«This work makes us think that increasing urbanization and rising temperatures associated with
global climate change could lead to increases in scale insect populations, which could have correspondingly negative
effects on trees
like the red maple,» Dale says.
«Considering the Southern Ocean absorbs something
like 60 % of heat and anthropogenic CO2 that enters the ocean, this wind has a noticeable
effect on
global warming,» said lead author Dr Andy Hogg from the Australian National University Hub of the ARC Centre of Excellence for Climate System Science.
«As the
global obesity epidemic intensifies, advertisements may have a greater
effect on people who are overweight and make snacks
like chocolate bars harder to resist,» adds Dr Amy Reichelt, lead author of the paper and UNSWpostdoctoral associate.
Like Foster and Rahmstorf, Lean and Rind (2008) performed a multiple linear regression on the temperature data, and found that while solar activity can account for about 11 % of the
global warming from 1889 to 2006, it can only account for 1.6 % of the warming from 1955 to 2005, and had a slight cooling
effect -LRB--0.004 °C per decade) from 1979 to 2005.
Volcanic eruptions and impacts from celestial bodies,
like asteroids, have a near instantaneous
effect, but very few of these one - time events are of sufficient size to impact the
global climate for more than a few years.
Elisabeth Kruegar, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ): «The World Water Scenarios Initiative can help raise awareness about where our behavior is leading to, and can also help to compare trends and different aspects of
global change,
like the drivers that they identified have an
effect on water, and also how water has an
effect on the drivers, the feedback between both the drivers and impacts are important.
In a world that needs to be saved from history's»
effects like war,
global warming, poverty, religion's ideology, hyper - consumption, etc.... Today's education (both classroom and beyond the classroom) has to be able to shape concerned individuals who can learn from human history and be more innovative than the box allows them, to be.
«These technologies will be critical to keeping
global warming under 2 °C, but we need to remain cognizant of their
effects on the environment, such as their higher use of metals
like steel and copper in manufacturing.
If the student types in «
global warming,» then it asks if you would also
like results that only focus on «causes of
global warming,» «
effects of
global warming,» and so on.
That would be the case if you were using a discount brokerage and you owned only one security: a
global index mutual fund or
global equity ETF that, in
effect, owned most of the stocks in the world all in one basket: something
like the Vanguard FTSE All - World ex-Canada Index ETF (VXC, TSX).
There's some James Montier research to the
effect that
global, developed market net nets have done something
like 35 % compound.
Like many other multinationals, its huge
global presence and diverse holdings insulate it against the worst
effects of disappointing results.
«Some organizations,
like Climate Central and extremists
like Bill McGibben, hype every major weather anomaly as proof of the profound
effects of human - induced
global warming.»
In view of the present discussion of the role of carbon dioxide in
effecting global temperature I would
like to know of any laboratory or bench experiments that show a temperature - CO2 concentration curve within the range of currently measured atmospheric CO2 levels.
There is absolutely no evidence that any human - engineered GE scheme that has been proposed or considered can duplicate «volcanos»
effect on
global temperature» in any sort of remotely controlled way, let alone «set
global temperature
like a thermostat».
Regarding the issue of liability for the
effects of
global warming, I would
like to point out that we're (USA & developed nations population mostly) the ones who burned the fossil fuels to CO2, not Peabody Coal or Exxon / Mobil.
I
like how she describes the struggles of Snowman as he tries to survive on an earth that has returned to a «wild» state yet is beset by the continuing
effects of
global warming and ozone layer depletion.
In regards to: «Regarding the issue of liability for the
effects of
global warming, I would
like to point out that we're (USA & developed nations population mostly) the ones who burned the fossil fuels to CO2, not Peabody Coal or Exxon / Mobil.»
Brian Dodge (359) Says: -LCB- Regarding the issue of liability for the
effects of
global warming, I would
like to point out that we're (USA & developed nations population mostly) the ones who burned the fossil fuels to CO2, not Peabody Coal or Exxon / Mobil.
Since, on average, aerosols have a cooling
effect (although some absorbing aerosols
like black carbon (soot) are actually adding to
global warming), reducing current aerosol levels (particularly sulphates) is equivalent to an extra warming
effect.
So in the case of
global warming just
like many other cases, I would indeed say that if the economic and quasi-economic rules of journalism dictate that a complex story shouldn't be covered, indeed, «
global warming» shouldn't be covered because it is one of the very complex systems on Earth influenced by very many complex
effects and their relationships.
Re 9 wili — I know of a paper suggesting, as I recall, that enhanced «backradiation» (downward radiation reaching the surface emitted by the air / clouds) contributed more to Arctic amplification specifically in the cold part of the year (just to be clear, backradiation should generally increase with any warming (aside from greenhouse feedbacks) and more so with a warming due to an increase in the greenhouse
effect (including feedbacks
like water vapor and, if positive, clouds, though regional changes in water vapor and clouds can go against the
global trend); otherwise it was always my understanding that the albedo feedback was key (while sea ice decreases so far have been more a summer phenomenon (when it would be warmer to begin with), the heat capacity of the sea prevents much temperature response, but there is a greater build up of heat from the albedo feedback, and this is released in the cold part of the year when ice forms later or would have formed or would have been thicker; the seasonal
effect of reduced winter snow cover decreasing at those latitudes which still recieve sunlight in the winter would not be so delayed).
A refreshing antidote to the political and economic slants that commonly color and distort news coverage of topics
like the greenhouse
effect, air quality, natural disasters and
global warming, Real Climate is a focused, objective blog written by scientists for a brainy community that
likes its climate commentary served hot.
I don't know if there are any German - speaking people here, but if you are, it would be great to see more of you working on articles
like Globale Erwärmung (
global warming) or my newest ambitions on Folgen der globalen Erwärmung (
effects of
global warming), and whatever climate - related article you can find.
The summary has already contributed to current policy documents and
like the NAS report on
global climate change, will have significant
effects on policy documents if not actual policy and dedisionmaking.
The downsides are that this type of geoengineering could have lots of unpredictable side
effects,
like screwing up
global rainfall patterns.
In
like manner, if I believe that the urban heat island
effect is responsible for AGW, why can't I just subtract the urban temperature profile from the
global surface temperature record and «whalla», problem solved.
Previously you have said you'd
like to see a proper debate about the consequences of
global warming (or words to that
effect).
About 1980ish, some old ideas
like the greenhouse
effect were brought out of mothballs and re-examined with new tools and techniques; simultaneously several researchers and theoreticians released their notes, published, or otherwise got together and there was a surprising consilience and not a small amount of mixing with old school hippy ecologism on some of the topics that became the roots of Climate Change science (before it was called
Global Warming); innovations in mathematics were also applied to climate thought; supercomputers (though «disappointing» on weather forecasting) allowed demonstration of plausibility of runaway climate
effects, comparison of scales of
effects, and the possibility of climate models combined with a good understanding of the limits of predictive power of weather models.
Like Foster and Rahmstorf, Lean and Rind (2008) performed a multiple linear regression on the temperature data, and found that although volcanic activity can account for about 10 % of the observed
global warming from 1979 to 2005, between 1889 and 2006 volcanic activity had a small net cooling
effect on
global temperatures.
Like last year's UN climate change talks, this year's conference in Doha culminated in an all - night session to hammer out a deal on preventing further
global warming and protecting people from the
effects of climate change.
While Aqua's measurements are geared toward understanding long - term problems
like global climate change, the satellite is also likely to have an immediate
effect on everyone.
By shifting between GHG
effect,
Global Warming, Climate Change and Climate Distruption, it is
like Texas sharpshooting, can't miss.
A number of studies have used a variety of statistical and physical approaches to determine the contribution of greenhouse gases and other
effects to the observed
global warming,
like Foster & Rahmstorf and Lean & Rind.
«In places
like Iceland, for example, where you have the Eyjafjallajökull ice sheet, which wouldn't survive [
global warming], and you've got lots of volcanoes under that, the unloading
effect can trigger eruptions,» McGuire said.
From the data in this post it seems
like uncontrolled fossil fuel burning is actually a net
global coolant due to the sulfates, so it seems that this would act as a break on CO2 based warming
effects.
We work with
global ocean circulation models to understand issues
like the thermal expansion of ocean waters due to
global warming or the
effect of changing ocean currents on regional sea levels.
I watched this with growing disinterest — it was certainly an answer to the Great
global warming swindle in that both were pretty dreadful — this was shockingly over simplistic and you knew from the start who was going to win — even Eastenders can manage a bit more intrigue — but then look what kind of rubbish passes for a subject on things
like Panorama; Having over done every other exciting angle on the «credit crunch» they did a program on how it's
effecting us — based super scientifically on a small sample of people moaning sorry responding to panorama online which somehow justified a whole program of what some people were doing
like driving less or renting a room out — totally pointless.
The Davis Strait polar bear subpopulation is said to be «vulnerable» to the supposed
effects of
global warming because,
like Hudson Bay, Davis Strait sea ice retreats every summer, leaving polar bears on land for several months.