As
the global extinction rate is already catastrophic and increasing exponentially, forest dependent organisms can not endure this trend, nor will most lifeforms on earth cope with further loss of the critical global forest carbon sink.
Not exact matches
At that same time, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Control's Fourth Assessment Report called climate change an «unequivocal» threat to humanity's stability;
extinction rates were accelerating; dry regions were becoming more arid; and
global fisheries were collapsing.
This could be occasion to paint a bleak picture: The current
rate of
global diversity loss is estimated to be a 1000 times higher than the
extinction that would occur naturally.
The entire amphibian class is currently afflicted by a
global pandemic that is accelerating
extinction at an alarming
rate.
Extinction rates on such islands ranged from 15 % to 30 %, but when cats, foxes, or dingoes were present, the
rates plummeted to just over 10 % — not much higher than on islands without any introduced predators, the scientists reported at the meeting and online this month in the journal
Global Ecology and Biogeography.
What would the reason be for this dramatic slowdown in species losses if the
extinction rate is determined by
global warming?
In a paper published in Science Advances, he proposes that mass
extinction occurs if one of two thresholds are crossed: For changes in the carbon cycle that occur over long timescales,
extinctions will follow if those changes occur at
rates faster than
global ecosystems can adapt.
They compared the modern
rate of species loss to the natural
rates of species
extinction before human activities dominated Earth, and found that people are actively participating in «a
global spasm of biodiversity loss.»
The resulting collapse / convergence in
global interest
rates & spreads, the implacable compression & decline in volatility / momentum, the restriction / regulation of banks» proprietary risk, numerous FX scandals, the replacement of human traders by algo - trading, the near
extinction of FX & macro funds, all served to disrupt and suppress currency for return & dynamic hedging strategies.
That
global species
extinction rates may have been exaggerated does not mean that
extinction and biodiversity loss are not serious problems.
The last hothouse
extinction, the PETM, also saw similar «slow»
rates of release from the
global carbon system.
He concludes that population growth is not a problem, that there is plenty of freshwater around, that deforestation
rates and species
extinctions are grossly exaggerated, that the pollution battle has been won, and that
global warming is too expensive to fix.
Organisms throughout the world, regardless of habitat, suffered similar
rates of
extinction, suggesting that the cause of the event was a
global, not local, occurrence, and that it was a sudden event, not a gradual change.
The fossil record indicates that the past 100 years has seen species
extinctions at 100 — 1,000 times the background
rate (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment 2005), and among five drivers of
global biodiversity loss between now and 2100 (climate change, land use change, atmospheric CO2 increases, nitrogen deposition, and species introductions), land use change — not climate change — is predicted to be the most important (Sala et al. 2000).
While only a few recent species
extinctions have been attributed to climate change, natural
global climate change at
rates slower than current anthropogenic climate change caused significant ecosystem shifts and species
extinctions in the past millions of years.
Athough habitat loss in
global biodiversity hotspots may overestimate
extinction rates [4], [24], our study shows that model projections based on naïve species - area curves can be hugely optimistic in the real - world.