Sentences with phrase «global flood did»

A global flood didn't happen in the first place.

When I say «I see no evidence for any God / gods and the evidence we do have proves a global flood did not occur as the bible claims» when asked by a believer why I don't believe, it might look very similiar to an anti-theist who is attempting to convince you to quit believing in God.

A global flood did not, could not have happened.

Not exact matches

Did global warming make the Houston floods worse?

The order and timing of the creation week does not match evolution and the fossil record, a global flood as described is not evident in the geologic record as would be expected, the stopped sun in Joshua's story would have caused major destruction that would be apparent in archaeology, etc..

I don't follow you, how does a global flood = more than one solid land mass, how are the 2 related?

God created Adam from a handful of dirt and his spouse from a rib; Talking snakes; trees that bear fruit, that imparts knowledge and eternal life; a global flood, that required a pair of each organism on earth, be stuffed onto a boat; people who lived hundreds of years; a man who was swallowed by a fish, only to be spit up 3 days later, unhurt; a tower god was afraid might reach heaven; a woman who is turned into a pillar of salt; talking donkeys; unicorns; satyrs; a leviathan god creates and then does battle with; a zombie messiah, who was actually god incarnate; zombie Saints who left their graves and wandered about the town; belief in a circular, flat earth.

Yeah but they want to teach the controversy... you know, how the earth might be only 10,000 years old (no it isn't) and that humans and dinosaurs roamed the earth together (no they didn't) and that evolution has no evidence (yes it does) or that there was a global flood (no there wasn't) or that the earth might be flat or the center of the universe or a million other wrong headed theories that fly in the face of the evidence.

There's no evidence of a global flood in the geological record, the logistics of getting animals from and returning them to the then - unknown Americas and Australia, there is not enough water to cover all land (i.e. Everest) and if there were where did it go, the flood would have killed all life on earth that was not in the Ark, the issue of food for all animals, the issue of predation.

Do you seriously not comprehend that what the writers of the bible might have seen as a global flood was probably very likely a local flood and due to their lack of ability to explore further, they wrote it in and added the fear factor of «be good or else»?

There was no global flood, the entire human race didn't come from two people in a garden who ate a fruit and got kicked out, there is no archaeological evidence of an exodus of over 1 million Israelites coming out of Egypt and wandering the desert for 40 years.

Later on, people don't like him so much so he kills them all with a global flood (through which an Egyptian dynasty miraculously survives).

How can you logically believe that Noah and his family managed to fit two of every animal on Earth (and the food to keep them all alive, not to mention how did they deal with all the poo from the thousands of animals, also... the travel necessary to accomplish such an illogical feat could not have been accomplished in one lifetime, even with today's travel technnology) in an ark that was 300 cubits x 50 cubits x 30 cubits (450 ft x 75 ft x 45 ft) and also believe that the 8 people that survived the «global flood» on the ark repopulated the planet?

In fact the evidence supporting evolution does contradict the special creation, the coexistence of all «kinds» together and their destruction in a single (mythical) global flood.

god is not real, the GLOBAL flood never happened, and jesus was just a delusional schizophrenic in a long line of delusional schizophrenics who left him a legacy of delusions to base his off of... The legacy is known today as jewish mysticism, jesus was after all a jew and he grew up like every other jew did — by learning his culture and history of his people — they keep records, RELIGIOUSLY!

But when it comes to something like a global flood, it jsut doesn't stand up to our understanding of the Earth these days.

I know you love to make excuses and come up with some whoppers to explain away the global flood that didn't happen and the lineage back to Adam and the DNA evidence that shows how we have evolved except Genesis is very clear as to the first humans.

They reported in the January 2010 edition of the journal Geophysical Research Letters that global warming does increase flood risk significantly, and that large floods have occurred more frequently in recent years than in the past.

One of the major thrusts of the report, which was discussed at PCAST's 15 March meeting in Washington, D.C., was to emphasize «climate preparedness» — a relabeling of the idea that the government should be doing more to prepare the nation to adapt to changes expected to be caused by global warming, such as rising seas, droughts, and floods.

Extreme weather does not prove the existence of global warming, but climate change is likely to exaggerate it — by messing with ocean currents, providing extra heat to forming tornadoes, bolstering heat waves, lengthening droughts and causing more precipitation and flooding.

While most scientists don't dispute the link between global warming and extreme weather, the once skeptical public is now starting to come around — especially following 2011, when floods, droughts, heat waves and tornadoes took a heavy toll on the U.S..

Similarly, the increasingly global ubiquity of smartphones should presumably boost the numbers and quality of UFO encounters captured on video (as they have done for rocket launches), but the flood of eerie footage has yet to materialize.

Aaron Lewis > Does anyone want to argue that global warming in some way mitigated the current flood situation in South - East Asia?

Explaining to Australian's that the recent flooding is due to «Global Warming» just reminds them they were told by Global Warming Advocates that the future held only drought, drought and more drought and if they didn't act to stop global warming they would all die of thirst or someGlobal Warming» just reminds them they were told by Global Warming Advocates that the future held only drought, drought and more drought and if they didn't act to stop global warming they would all die of thirst or someGlobal Warming Advocates that the future held only drought, drought and more drought and if they didn't act to stop global warming they would all die of thirst or someglobal warming they would all die of thirst or something.

The first thirty minutes contain a huge war of global domination, the flooding of a temple with water from the Nile (does it completely drain the river?)

There do seem to be a higher than normal number of floods these past few years (Britain, China, United States), but can we attribute that to global warming, or not?

Does anyone want to argue that global warming in some way mitigated the current flood situation in South - East Asia?

Nor will I attempt to relate droughts and floods to global warming, others have already done that.

Yes but food doesn't grow in deserts, or survive under flood water and that is what global warming is bringing.

Aaron Lewis > Does anyone want to argue that global warming in some way mitigated the current flood situation in South - East Asia?

As far back as the 1950's, when instructional science filmmaking was in its heyday, Frank Capra did a film on weather and climate that included a section on carbon dioxide and global warming that plays like a compressed version of «An Inconvenient Truth,» replete with flooded American landscapes and crumbling ice sheets.

The reason I say that is that Revkin apparently didn't find reason enough to report on the Bush administration's firing of my brother, after I had sent him the documentation that accompanied NOAA's removal of my brother from the National Weather Service for his 2003 press release documenting the effects of early snowmelt and spring flooding on Midwest flood prone areas, unquestionably due to anthropogenic global warming.

Those floods spread north to Canada if memory serves me well and seemed less linked to global warming then these floods do.

Global warming is processing, our human being living conditions are changing: more drought, more flood, hotter, we have to research crops which can adapt these conditions whether genetic modify way or hybridization way, food hybridization have been done from long before.

Moreover, the flooding pattern could well be cyclical, so his claim did nothing at all to help those scientists and others who are worried about global warming, and with good reason.

However, higher temperatures do cause an increased chance of heavy precipitation events, and it is likely that the flooding in some of this year's U.S. flooding disasters were significantly enhanced by the presence of more water vapor in the air due to global warming.

I wish it were the case that the rate of global warming has significantly slowed and that we don't have to «be scared» of more extreme weather events, droughts and flooding.

«With global temperatures hitting a new record high and repeated episodes of severe weather, including flooding in this country, helping people to understand the basic science behind climate change as well as the consequences for our nature, our businesses and food supply feels like an important thing to do.»

Seeking to better understand historical changes in flooding, Do et al. (2017) analyzed records of maximum daily streamflow from 3558 locations to develop «the most comprehensive observation - based record of... streamflow at the global scale currently available.»

But it does indeed add up to centennial variability in floods and drought and in global ocean and atmospheric heat content.

Like many other conference speakers and attendees, Secretary - General Ban cited the recent droughts, floods, and Tropical Storm Sandy as proof of the dire consequences of man - made global warming, even though many studies and scientists (including scientists who usually fall into the climate alarmist category) have stated that there is no evidence to support claims that «extreme weather» has been increasing in frequency and / or magnitude in recent years, or that extreme events (hurricanes, droughts, heat waves, etc.) have anything to do with increased CO2 levels.

I was amazed at the Government and Green responses to the serious flooding in the English Midlands a couple of years ago, when increassed rainfall due to alleged Man - made Global Warming was trumpeted as a cause for the flooding; anyone who pointed out that generations of covering flood plains with buildings, concrete and ashphalt was quite a dangerous thing to do was derided as a simpleton or an ignoramus.

16 Sea level rising by thermal expansion AND ice melt Sea ice melting (Arctic and Antarctic) Glaciers melting worldwide Arctic and Antarctic Peninsula heating up fastest Melting on ice sheets is accelerating More severe weather (droughts, floods, storms, heat waves, hard freezes, etc.) Bottom line: These changes do not fit the natural patterns unless we add the effects of increased Greenhouse gasses Signs that global warming is underway

While St. Louis doesn't have to worry directly about sea levels or ice melt, stronger weather patterns including more droughts and floods are likely consequences of global warming, they said.

They talk about the flood of the Agassi sea 8000 years ago but don't even mention the gloabl Meltwater Pulse 1 A 12000 years ago (a date that coincides with Plato's mention of the end of Atlantis)(100m global sea level rise)

Did global warming cause a specific flood?

Optimism is reported, but how can we be optimistic when there is so much to do, in so many regions, as global warming provides us all with floods, sudden storms and worse!

«Facts Don't Lie: Unexceptional Global Climate Warming In The U.S. Main Fiji: Scientists Establish The Relationship Between Modern CO2 Emissions & Severe Flooding»

Or do you believe that global T somehow influence local precipitations, or drough, or freezing, or fires, or floods?

''... real scientists engaged in real research have used sound statistical methods to investigate this topic; and what they typically find does not bode well for climate alarmists... performed a series of statistical analyses on these data, seeking to determine «whether the data set can reveal the degree to which islands in the Pacific are already seeing the impact of global climate change on the risk of severe flooding.»