Not exact matches
Environmentalists have long scrutinized Exxon Mobil for giving
money «to dozens of right - leaning interest groups whose main purpose was to cast doubt on that very science» despite understanding the link between
global warming and the burning of
fossil fuels as early as the 1970s, according to the New York Times.
For a
fossil fuel - driven vanity project with more
money than Scrooge McDuck and ambitions of
global domination, Manchester City have got a surprising number of quite likeable footballers.
A study published today, by a group led by the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), indicates that eliminating
fossil fuel subsidies could curb
global greenhouse gas emissions by as much as 5 % through 2030 while saving hundreds of billions of dollars in public
money.
Combating climate change needs
money that is only available in
global bond and equity markets, which are heavily invested in
fossil fuels; public finances are needed to make them change direction
Accusations of corrupt
fossil fuel industry influence over skeptic climate scientists are irrelevant material — worthless — in the absence of any physical evidence (full context document scans, undercover video / audio transcripts, leaked emails,
money - transfer receipts) proving such skeptics were paid and orchestrated to lie about the certainty of catastrophic man - caused
global warming.
As the
fossil fuel divestment movement grows increasingly mainstream — even BlackRock recently partnered with the Natural Resources Defense Council to launch an «equity
global index series that will exclude companies linked to exploration, ownership or extraction of carbon - based
fossil fuel reserves» — the smart long - term investment
money would seem to be on divestment.
As ever, the fatal problem with enviro - activists» enslavement to the «reposition
global warming as theory» phrase as proof that skeptics are paid illicit
money to lie about certainty of
global warming is that there is no evidence of it being a top - down
fossil fuel industry directive of any kind.
Fossil Free Southwark's first members met one another in February 2015 underneath the letter «N» whilst spelling out the words «Divest London» in front of Tower Bridge as part of a Global Divestment Day event calling on City Hall to take its money out of fossil
Fossil Free Southwark's first members met one another in February 2015 underneath the letter «N» whilst spelling out the words «Divest London» in front of Tower Bridge as part of a
Global Divestment Day event calling on City Hall to take its
money out of
fossil fossil fuels.
Forget the #ExxonKnew effort to re-invigorate the otherwise 25 year - old accusation that skeptic climate scientists are paid corrupting
money by
fossil fuel companies to lie to the public about the certainty of catastrophic man - caused
global warming.
The
money spent on the Flannery ads would have been far better spent on ads dispelling some of the misinformation concerning the safety of nuclear energy, which if adopted in place of
fossil -
fuel power generation will make a much bigger impact on
global warming.
For all their «ethical» screens and engagement and transparency, almost all of the formal pensions options are based on funds which invest at least some
money in mainstream stocks in
global companies, many of which are involved in the kind of issues — tax avoidance, animal abuse, short - termism,
fossil fuels — that Ethical Consumer chooses to draw attention to.
So Gray and anyone so inclined is right to follow the
money, but since 80 per cent of the
global and U.S. economy runs on
fossil fuels, if you do some real math the trail leads directly to those who profit most from
fossil fuels, not those worth one - ten thousandth or less who study their effects.»
The Donors Trust and Donors Capital Fund, both based in Virginia, are donor - advised funds that have channeled
money from the Kochs, owners of the sprawling conglomerate Koch Industries and outspoken supporters of conservative causes, to groups that deny the link between
fossil fuels and
global warming, the paper says.
Meanwhile a housing and financial bubble bursting in China, and the inflationary bubble in the US funded by the magic
money of the Fed are both set to burst into undeniable reality any time soon, will at least drive down
fossil fuel use during the looming new
global recession about to hit from the two biggest economies on the world going someways down the toilet.....
Webb wrote to Davey a few days later: «[Newspaper] articles reported you backing moves that would encourage investors to think about moving their
money out of «risky»
fossil fuel assets, suggesting
global emissions limits could make hydrocarbon reserves unburnable, therefore stranding assets and rendering them worthless.»