Sentences with phrase «global headlines did»

A cyber attack that hit A.P. Moller - Maersk's IT systems in June 2017 and made global headlines did not involve navigation but underscored the threat hackers pose to the technology dependent and inter-connected shipping industry.

Not exact matches

Investors may over-react to earnings «misses,» political or global news headlines, and other things that over the long run have nothing to do with the ability of a company to produce and to grow its earnings.

Do you know that Goldenberg and yourself are the two scientific witnesses cited by the german news magazine Der Spiegel yesterday under the headline that the increase in hurricane activity «has nothing to do with global warming»Do you know that Goldenberg and yourself are the two scientific witnesses cited by the german news magazine Der Spiegel yesterday under the headline that the increase in hurricane activity «has nothing to do with global warming»do with global warming»?

Under the Web site headline «Global Warming «May Cut Deaths,»» it reported 20,000 deaths are linked to the cold each year in the U.K. and that those deaths fell 3 % a year from 1971 through 2003, a period in which summers warmed but heat - related deaths did not change.

The good news that (happily) violated that norm and rippled in headlines this week came in a World Bank report showing a broad reduction in deep poverty and concluding that the great global recession did not increase poverty in the developing world.

The 2017 UN climate summit may not hit the headlines as some of its predecessors have done, but it can speed up global action.

In the scorching summer of 1988, when global warming first hit headlines in a significant way, presidential candidate George H.W. Bush used a Michigan speech to pledge meaningful action curbing heat - trapping greenhouse gases, saying, «Those who think we are powerless to do anything about the greenhouse effect forget about the White House effect.»

It is apparently now «headline news» that the man who will be in charge of all of our public lands, which are being devastated by human - caused climate change — some of which was caused by fossil fuels extracted from those lands — doesn't believe there is a massive conspiracy carried out by the entire global scientific community and literally every single major government in the world, including our own, to fool the public and media.

5 November, 2017 — The 2017 UN climate summit may not hit the headlines as some of its predecessors have done, but it can speed up global action.

They make a big deal that Jo Nova uses a headline «Man Made Global Warming Disproved» but then «admits» that atmospheric CO2 does have a warming effect.

Small Island States don't (yet *) make global headlines, but this NASA picture shows a new Pacific climate record, which has a story for us all.

Global warming catastrophists do not want to admit this bias, because it would undermine their headlines - grabbing forecasts.

Oh and it's not that I don't like the headline — it would be a great headline for a study that proved half of global warming was artificial.

You get much scarier headlines with threats of 6C increases in «global average temperature» than you do in whatever the measure is of the total climate system's heat content.

Brian Kahn at Climate Central http://www.climatecentral.org/news/may-warm-streak-planet-21542 uses the word streak in headline about the rise of global temps, but I think that is the wrong term and leads other narrative types to misunderstand the new normal global temps as a streak that will be broken because streaks do get broken.

This is a natural cycle that will occur independently of global warming and doesn't detract from the argument at all, if you read the actual article (although the headline writer at the BBC got it all wrong)

The scattered bits of temperature data mentioned in the article don't even pretend to support the «Global Cooling» of the headline.

Not only did it make many newspaper headlines [New Research Questions Uniqueness of Recent Warming, Past Climate Change Questioned etc.] when it first appeared, it also was raised in the US Senate as a reason for the US not to join the global climate protection efforts.

The surprise to me with this lawsuit is that it doesn't feature sensational evidence like others did — the older Kivalina v Exxon case and the newer San Mateo / Marin / Imperial Beach v. Chevron cases — by citing the infamous «leaked memo set» headlined with «reposition global warming as theory rather than fact,» which are universally accepted among enviro - activists as smoking gun evidence of skeptic climate scientists being paid to push misinformation to the public at the behest of sinister corporate handlers.

LegalXMLA small irony here: on looking up the OASIS site that deals with LegalXML I see that the current headline is: «OASIS Members to Create Framework for Global Sharing of Criminal and Terrorist Evidence / XML Specification Will Deliver Reliable Authentication and Auditing to Safeguard Privacy and Increase Effectiveness of Lawful Intercepts» or the like could do the job.