It comes down to this simple fact: the overwhelming majority of the scientific evidence points to human - induced global heating, and every claim made by
global heating deniers has been effectively debunked.
The article also pointed out that the scientists did something that many
global heating deniers do not — they verified their conclusions.
One of the more common arguments you hear from
global heating deniers and skeptics is that the urban heat island effect is causing global temperature measurements to look a lot hotter than they actually are.
However, it's the minority composed of
global heating deniers who continue to hunt for flaws in climate science, so the deniers serve a valuable scientific purpose — when they find a real hole, or just think they have, addressing their claims are what has made the science of global heating as bullet - proof as it now is.
Only articles written specifically about
global heating deniers and their hypotheses should contain more than that tiny fraction of information.
Everyone: call on the American Museum of Natural History to remove
global heating denier Rebekah Mercer from its board.
Not exact matches
Last year, state officials strongly criticized
Global's applications for crude
heating facilities as incomplete, and threatened to
deny the company's permits unless it provided more information about the type of crude it intended to bring through the facility as well as its insurance coverage and spill - response plans.
Numerous
denier arguments involving slight fluctuations in the
global distribution of warmer vs cooler sea surface areas as supposed explanations of climate change neglect all the energy that goes into ocean
heat content, melting large ice deposits and so forth.
I have no doubt that your blog entry will be followed by the usual responses: those who
deny the existence of
global warming, those who
deny the link between greenhouse gases and
global warming, those who insist there still isn't enough evidence, and those who can not see beyond the rising prices of gasoline and
heating oil.
Muller spent two years investigating claims by
global - warming
deniers that temperature rises verified by multiple studies were skewed because of flawed analysis, unreliable weather stations and the effect of urban
heat islands.
Not long after the release of Ross Gelbspan's 1997 «The
Heat is On» book, words in its book jacket sleeve about him being a «Pulitzer - winning journalist exposing industry efforts to confuse the public about
global warming» drew a response from skeptic climate scientist Dr S. Fred Singer, who categorically
denied any quid pro quo arrangement with «big coal & oil», while also directly saying Gelbspan was not a Pulitzer winner.
So
global warming's not really going to make anyone lazier per se; it's going to make it unnaturally difficult to get any work done outside — though some (climate
deniers, * cough cough *) will inevitably chalk the declining productivity up to some collective lack of a will to work, I wonder how many people would last 8 hours harvesting crops by hand in 100 degree
heat.