Severity of illness (global symptom severity scale), change in symptoms (clinical
global improvement scale), and social functioning (Sheehan Disability Scale).
Change in score on 12 primary measures: Clinician - Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS 2) total of 3 clusters and severity, Impact of Events Scale (IES)(self rated), Beck Depression Inventory (self rated),
Global Improvement scale (self and assessor rated), main problem (self and assessor rated), total of 4 goals to deal with the problem (self and assessor rated), and Work and Social Adjustment scale (self and assessor rated).
Not exact matches
He also managed large -
scaled business
improvement projects for
Global 1000 companies, concentrating on airlines, manufacturers and retailers.
At its heart is the idea to make the most of the
scale of the North, by better linking it together through transport
improvement, creating one single economy that can compete on the
global stage.
This is the most significant
improvement in
global fuel standards for the shipping industry in 100 years, intended to achieve significant health benefits on a
global scale.
He received the Ko Awatea International Excellence Award for Leading Health
Improvement on a
Global Scale.
Using research capabilities from MIT and other leading universities, the effectiveness of the learning apps is measured to ensure the continuous
improvement of every child's learning and to reach their aim of spreading literacy on a
global scale.
From ambitious beginnings as the Centre for British Teachers in 1968 to today's Education Development Trust, a major force in education
improvement on a
global scale — under the leadership of Patrick Brazier, we remain focussed on our mission to transform lives by improving education around the world.
Veterinarians should be acknowledged for their contribution to the
improvement of veterinary medicine on a
global scale.
Margaret Gould Stewart, Facebook's director of product design, outlines three rules for design at such a massive
scale — one so big that the tiniest of tweaks can cause
global outrage, but also so large that the subtlest of
improvements can positively impact the lives of many.
At tenfold
improvements to present costs, and, setting aside the need to conduct a two century long
global project without interruption, deployment on a
global scale, dropping 300 ppm in atmosphere (equivalent to 750 ppm overall) is by one calculation available at a cost of double the Gross World Product in 2014.
It presents detailed country - level and
global data that outline the
scale of the challenges ahead as countries try to meet the three objectives of the Sustainable Energy for All Initiative: providing universal access to modern energy, doubling the share of renewable energy in the
global energy mix, and doubling the rate of
improvement in energy efficiency — all by 2030.
Tags for this Online Resume: P&L Management, Operations / Quality Management, Leadership / Talent Development, Productivity / Process
Improvement, Contract / SLA Administration,
Global Sourcing, RFP / Pricing / Sales Support, Strategic Planning, Risk / Business Continuity Management, Client Consulting, C - Level / Executive Relations and Presentation Skills, Project / Program Management, Organizational Change Management, Client Retention, P&L / Financial Management, Building and Leading Teams, Productivity
Improvement / Cost Reduction, Business Process / Service Delivery
Improvement (Lean, Six Sigma), Client Management and Consulting, Large
Scale Project / Program / Implementation Management, Organization and Client Change Management, Client Retention, Revenue Growth, RFP, Pricing, and Sales Support, Managing and Developing Talent
Self - motivated, well - rounded project management professional with an established history of process and quality
improvement having more than 10 years of experience managing successful program initiatives and large -
scale projects for organizations ranging from small consulting firms to
global, multi-billion dollar engineering firms looking to apply knowledge and skills in a new area of project management.
Here is a great role for a Maintenance Engineer who wants to be involved in automated systems and work on technically interesting state of the art equipment The company are a
global leader in automated systems and partner with blue chip manufacturers to support them with the onsite automated facilities to product high levels of production output The role itself involves onsite maintenance at a major and highly automated production facility where you will be accountable for PPM, reactive maintenance, fault finding, programming (will be training on this) and continuous
improvements projects This is a fantastic chance to join a world leader where you can quickly become top of your game on cutting edge automated equipment on a large scale The Role: * Maintenance Engineer * PPM, Reactive, Continuous Improvements * Automated equipment and PLC's The Person: * Maintenance Engineer * Electrical bias * Experience of PLC's This vacancy is being advertised by Rise Technical Recru
improvements projects This is a fantastic chance to join a world leader where you can quickly become top of your game on cutting edge automated equipment on a large
scale The Role: * Maintenance Engineer * PPM, Reactive, Continuous
Improvements * Automated equipment and PLC's The Person: * Maintenance Engineer * Electrical bias * Experience of PLC's This vacancy is being advertised by Rise Technical Recru
Improvements * Automated equipment and PLC's The Person: * Maintenance Engineer * Electrical bias * Experience of PLC's This vacancy is being advertised by Rise Technical Recruitment Ltd..
Primary outcome: treatment response defined variably; number of patients with at least a 50 % reduction from baseline score on a condition relevant
scale: the Hamilton Anxiety Scale for generalised anxiety disorder (GAD), the Panic Disorder Severity Scale or the Sheehan Panic Anxiety Scale — Patient for panic disorder, the Brief Social Phobia Scale or the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale for social phobia or a Clinical Global Impressions — Improvement (CGI - I) score of 1
scale: the Hamilton Anxiety
Scale for generalised anxiety disorder (GAD), the Panic Disorder Severity Scale or the Sheehan Panic Anxiety Scale — Patient for panic disorder, the Brief Social Phobia Scale or the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale for social phobia or a Clinical Global Impressions — Improvement (CGI - I) score of 1
Scale for generalised anxiety disorder (GAD), the Panic Disorder Severity
Scale or the Sheehan Panic Anxiety Scale — Patient for panic disorder, the Brief Social Phobia Scale or the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale for social phobia or a Clinical Global Impressions — Improvement (CGI - I) score of 1
Scale or the Sheehan Panic Anxiety
Scale — Patient for panic disorder, the Brief Social Phobia Scale or the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale for social phobia or a Clinical Global Impressions — Improvement (CGI - I) score of 1
Scale — Patient for panic disorder, the Brief Social Phobia
Scale or the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale for social phobia or a Clinical Global Impressions — Improvement (CGI - I) score of 1
Scale or the Liebowitz Social Anxiety
Scale for social phobia or a Clinical Global Impressions — Improvement (CGI - I) score of 1
Scale for social phobia or a Clinical
Global Impressions —
Improvement (CGI - I) score of 1 or 2.
Improvement in symptoms of depression (Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised, Clinical Global Impressions improvement score), and reduction in suicidal thoughts (Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire - Junior High Schoo
Improvement in symptoms of depression (Children's Depression Rating
Scale - Revised, Clinical
Global Impressions
improvement score), and reduction in suicidal thoughts (Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire - Junior High Schoo
improvement score), and reduction in suicidal thoughts (Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire - Junior High School Version).
Responders (much improved or very much improved) based on the Clinical
Global Impression
Global Improvement Item and mean change from baseline on the Liebowitz Social Anxiety
Scale total score.
Analysis of covariance showed that compared with the TAU group, the IPT - A group showed significantly fewer clinician - reported depression symptoms on the Hamilton Depression Rating
Scale (P =.04), significantly better functioning on the Children's Global Assessment Scale (P =.04), significantly better overall social functioning on the Social Adjustment Scale — Self - Report (P =.01), significantly greater clinical improvement (P =.03), and significantly greater decrease in clinical severity (P =.03) on the Clinical Global Impressions s
Scale (P =.04), significantly better functioning on the Children's
Global Assessment
Scale (P =.04), significantly better overall social functioning on the Social Adjustment Scale — Self - Report (P =.01), significantly greater clinical improvement (P =.03), and significantly greater decrease in clinical severity (P =.03) on the Clinical Global Impressions s
Scale (P =.04), significantly better overall social functioning on the Social Adjustment
Scale — Self - Report (P =.01), significantly greater clinical improvement (P =.03), and significantly greater decrease in clinical severity (P =.03) on the Clinical Global Impressions s
Scale — Self - Report (P =.01), significantly greater clinical
improvement (P =.03), and significantly greater decrease in clinical severity (P =.03) on the Clinical
Global Impressions
scalescale.
The primary outcome was clinical response defined using a
global rating scale (eg, «much improved» or «very much improved» on the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI)-RRB- or a set level of improvement on a continuous depression rating scale (eg, improvement of 50 % or greater from baseline to end of treatment on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) or the Montgomery — Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
global rating
scale (eg, «much improved» or «very much improved» on the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI)-RRB- or a set level of improvement on a continuous depression rating scale (eg, improvement of 50 % or greater from baseline to end of treatment on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) or the Montgomery — Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)-
scale (eg, «much improved» or «very much improved» on the Clinical
Global Impression Scale (CGI)-RRB- or a set level of improvement on a continuous depression rating scale (eg, improvement of 50 % or greater from baseline to end of treatment on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) or the Montgomery — Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
Global Impression
Scale (CGI)-RRB- or a set level of improvement on a continuous depression rating scale (eg, improvement of 50 % or greater from baseline to end of treatment on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) or the Montgomery — Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)-
Scale (CGI)-RRB- or a set level of
improvement on a continuous depression rating
scale (eg, improvement of 50 % or greater from baseline to end of treatment on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) or the Montgomery — Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)-
scale (eg,
improvement of 50 % or greater from baseline to end of treatment on the Hamilton Depression Rating
Scale (HAMD) or the Montgomery — Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)-
Scale (HAMD) or the Montgomery — Asberg Depression Rating
Scale (MADRS)-
Scale (MADRS)-RRB-.
Proportion of responders at end of treatment or at study endpoint if treatment was longer than 6 weeks (based on score
improvements on Hamilton Rating
Scale for Depression (HAMD), the Clinical
Global Impression index (CGI), rating as at least «much improved» on global improvement subscale, Depression Scale von Zerssen (DS) or any other clinical response measure); safety (proportion of dropouts due to adverse ev
Global Impression index (CGI), rating as at least «much improved» on
global improvement subscale, Depression Scale von Zerssen (DS) or any other clinical response measure); safety (proportion of dropouts due to adverse ev
global improvement subscale, Depression
Scale von Zerssen (DS) or any other clinical response measure); safety (proportion of dropouts due to adverse events).
Treatment response (defined as ≥ 50 % reduction in score on the HAM - D or Montgomery - Asberg Depression Rating
Scale [MADRS] or a rating of very much improved or much improved on the Clinical Global Impressions scale for Improvement [CGI - I]-
Scale [MADRS] or a rating of very much improved or much improved on the Clinical
Global Impressions
scale for Improvement [CGI - I]-
scale for
Improvement [CGI - I]-RRB-.
Primary outcomes were response (Clinical
Global Impressions [CGI]
scale improvement rating) and depressive symptoms (Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised [CDRS - R]-RRB- which were measured weekly by clinic
scale improvement rating) and depressive symptoms (Children's Depression Rating
Scale - Revised [CDRS - R]-RRB- which were measured weekly by clinic
Scale - Revised [CDRS - R]-RRB- which were measured weekly by clinicians.
Primary efficacy measure: response (Clinical
Global Impressions
Scale - Improvement (CGI - I) score of very much or much improved based on the assessor's perception of improvement, anxiety scale scores and patient self - rep
Scale -
Improvement (CGI - I) score of very much or much improved based on the assessor's perception of improvement, anxiety scale scores and patient self
Improvement (CGI - I) score of very much or much improved based on the assessor's perception of
improvement, anxiety scale scores and patient self
improvement, anxiety
scale scores and patient self - rep
scale scores and patient self - report).
Validity was assessed against several established measures of social anxiety,
global assessments of severity and
improvement, and
scales assessing physical health and disability.
Measures utilized include the Wechsler Intelligence
Scale for Children - Fourth Edition (WISC - IV), the Swanson, Nolan and Pelham (SNAP - IV) Questionnaire, the Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI - I), the Conners» 10 - item scale and the Family Burden of Illness Module (F
Scale for Children - Fourth Edition (WISC - IV), the Swanson, Nolan and Pelham (SNAP - IV) Questionnaire, the Clinical
Global Impression -
Improvement (CGI - I), the Conners» 10 - item
scale and the Family Burden of Illness Module (F
scale and the Family Burden of Illness Module (FBIM).
Global improvement was rated on a seven point
scale from very much better to very much worse.
Self rated
global improvement at final follow up (table 2) was consistent with outcome on the other measures of fatigue, social adjustment
scale, mood, and fear.
The main outcome was attendance at school at least 75 % of the time and a fatigue score of less than 4.20 Subsidiary outcomes included the social adjustment questionnaire, 21 the hospital anxiety and depression
scale, 22 the fear questionnaire, 23 and
global self ratings of
improvement and satisfaction with treatment.
Measures utilized include the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, 4th Edition, the Expressive Vocabulary Test, 2nd Edition, the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for DSM — IV, child and parent versions (ADIS - C / P), the Clinical
Global Impression — Severity (CGI - S), the Disruptive Behavior Disorders Rating
Scale (DBDRS), the Behavior Assessment System for Children — Second Edition (BASC), the Parent Consumer Satisfaction Questionnaire, and the Clinical
Global Impression —
Improvement (CGI - I).
Measures utilized include the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for Children (ADIS - C - IV), Spence Children's Anxiety
Scale (SCAS), Spence Children's Anxiety
Scale — Parent Version (SCAS - P), Child Anxiety Life Interference
Scale (CALIS), Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (S - MFQ), Becks Youth Inventories (BYI), Experience of Service Questionnaire (ESQ), Children's Automatic Thought
Scale (CATS), Self - Efficacy Questionnaire for Children (SEQ), Depression Anxiety Stress
Scales (DASS) for parents, Rearing Behavior Questionnaire (RBQ), Clinical
Global Impression —
Improvement Scale (CGI - I) and Children's
Global Assessment
Scale (C - GAS).
Measures utilized include the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for Children (ADIS - C - IV), Screen for Anxiety and Related Disorders (SCARED), Clinical
Global Impression
Scale -
Improvement (CGI - I), Children's
Global Assessment
Scale (C - GAS), Parent Consumer Satisfaction
Scale, and the Barriers to Treatment Participation
Scales.
Measures utilized include the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School - Age Children - Epidemiologic version (K - SADS - E), the Wechsler Intelligence
Scale for Children - Revised, the Parent - Child Relationship Inventory (PCRI), the Parenting Stress Index (PSI), the Oppositional Defiant Disorder Rating
Scale (ODDRS), and the Clinical
Global Impression —
Improvement (CGI - I).
Response (score of 1 or 2 (much or very much improved) on the Clinical
Global Impressions -
Improvement scale); symptom severity or investigator defined response on closely related measures; symptom severity (clinician rated DSM based anxiety scales such as the Child Yale - Brown Obsessive - Compulsive Scale); adverse ev
scale); symptom severity or investigator defined response on closely related measures; symptom severity (clinician rated DSM based anxiety
scales such as the Child Yale - Brown Obsessive - Compulsive
Scale); adverse ev
Scale); adverse events.
Presence and severity of child primary anxiety disorder (Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for DSM - IV, child / parent versions),
improvement in child presentation of anxiety (Clinical Global Impression — Improvement scale), and change in child anxiety symptoms (Spence Children's Anxiety Scale, child / parent version and Child Anxiety Impact scale, parent version) were assessed at post-treatment and for those in the two active treatment groups, 6 months post
improvement in child presentation of anxiety (Clinical
Global Impression —
Improvement scale), and change in child anxiety symptoms (Spence Children's Anxiety Scale, child / parent version and Child Anxiety Impact scale, parent version) were assessed at post-treatment and for those in the two active treatment groups, 6 months post
Improvement scale), and change in child anxiety symptoms (Spence Children's Anxiety Scale, child / parent version and Child Anxiety Impact scale, parent version) were assessed at post-treatment and for those in the two active treatment groups, 6 months post-treat
scale), and change in child anxiety symptoms (Spence Children's Anxiety
Scale, child / parent version and Child Anxiety Impact scale, parent version) were assessed at post-treatment and for those in the two active treatment groups, 6 months post-treat
Scale, child / parent version and Child Anxiety Impact
scale, parent version) were assessed at post-treatment and for those in the two active treatment groups, 6 months post-treat
scale, parent version) were assessed at post-treatment and for those in the two active treatment groups, 6 months post-treatment.
The authors also found that, using a
global emotional and motivational scaffolding
scale, mothers demonstrated improved co-regulation (i.e. higher ratings of
global motivational and emotional scaffolding, higher frequency of more adaptive strategies such as redirection of attention) over the course of the intervention, and that this was also associated with
improvements in toddler emotion regulation (i.e. less expressed negativity and avoidance).