«The simple relationship between the temperature and
the global land carbon sink should be treated with caution, and not be used to infer ecological processes and long - term predictions» adds Dr. Reichstein, head of the Department.
Co-author Professor Peter Cox, of the University of Exeter, summarises the consequences of the study: «despite nutrient limitations in some regions, our study indicates that CO2 - fertilization of photosynthesis is currently playing a major role in
the global land carbon sink.
Not exact matches
«The implications for the
global carbon sink are profound,» said Dr Andrew Marshall from the University's Environment Department and Director of Conservation Science at Flamingo
Land.
Discussions on whether temperature or water availability is driving the strength of these variations in the
land carbon sink have been highly contested with these year - to - year changes of the
carbon balance seemingly related to
global or tropical temperatures.
If the recent «slowdown» in
global surface warming is reversing, the stronger
land carbon sink seen in recent years may weaken again, and the rise in CO2 may quicken again.
The elements that I believe are key to a successful agreement in Copenhagen include: • Strong targets and timetables from industrialized countries and differentiated but binding commitments from developing countries that put the entire world under a system with one commitment: to reduce emissions of
carbon dioxide and other
global warming pollutants that cause the climate crisis; • The inclusion of deforestation, which alone accounts for twenty percent of the emissions that cause
global warming; • The addition of
sinks including those from soils, principally from farmlands and grazing
lands with appropriate methodologies and accounting.
``... estimate that variations in diffuse fraction, associated largely with the «
global dimming» period6, 7, 8, enhanced the
land carbon sink by approximately one - quarter between 1960 and 1999.
For more than a decade, researchers have struggled and failed to balance
global carbon budgets, which must balance
carbon emissions to the atmosphere from fossil fuels (6.3 Pg per year; numbers here from Skee Houghton at Woods Hole Research Center) and
land use change (2.2 Pg; deforestation, agriculture etc.) with
carbon dioxide accumulation in the atmosphere (3.2 Pg) and the
carbon sinks taking
carbon out of the atmosphere, especially
carbon dioxide dissolving in Ocean surface waters (2.4 Pg).
On a
global scale, forests that serve as invaluable
carbon «
sinks» —
lands that absorb more
carbon than they emit — are under siege.
Because these
lands play such a vital role as
carbon sinks, it's no surprise that their destruction is partly responsible for the emissions from
land use changes that add up to nearly 18 percent of the total
global warming effect.
Having retrieved the original article (Canadell et al., 2007, PNAS online) it's written (p. 3) that 65 + / -16 % of... d ² CO2 / dt ² (translation of «increase of atmospheric CO2 growth rate») is attributed to «the increase in the
global economy», the remaining 35 + / -16 % being attributed to «the increase in
carbon intensity in the
global economy» and 18 + / -15 % to «the decrease in the efficiency of the
lands and ocean
sinks in removing anthropogenic CO2».