Sentences with phrase «global magnetic activity»
Current research foci include the magnetized solar atmosphere, global magnetic activity in the sun and stars, and high resolution techniques.
http://www.uksolphys.org/ Not exact matches
Heliophysics encompasses cosmic rays and particle acceleration, space weather and radiation, dust and magnetic reconnection, solar activity and stellar cycles, aeronomy and space plasmas, magnetic fields and global change, and the interactions of the solar system with our galaxy.»
There is no room for complacency, Svalgaard warns: «If the Earth does cool during the next sunspot crash and we do nothing, when the sun's magnetic activity returns, global warming will return with a vengeance.»
Clearly, there is a strong relationship between solar activity (magnetic solar flux) and global temperatures.
We show that the index commonly used for quantifying long - term changes in solar activity, the sunspot number, accounts for only one part of solar activity (William: Closed magnetic field) and using this index leads to the underestimation of the role of solar activity in the global warming in the recent decades.
They argue that total magnetic activity is much better correlated with global warming than is sunspot number alone.
Alex Rawl writes «Dozens of peer - reviewed studies have found a very high degree of correlation -LRB-.5 to.8) between solar - magnetic activity and global temperature going back many thousands of years»
Dozens of peer - reviewed studies have found a very high degree of correlation -LRB-.5 to.8) between solar - magnetic activity and global temperature going back many thousands of years (Bond 2001, Neff 2001, Shaviv 2003, Usoskin 2005, and many others listed below).
One thing is certain, based on past climate history and solar history, if in fact the suns magnetic activity slows, or collapses and we enter a prolonged period of little or no sunspot activity, we'll see a global cooling trend.
In the almost sure knowledge that the earth never experienced a runaway greenhouse even with ancient CO2 levels 10 to 20 times greater than today, these anti-science scoundrels insist with a «high level of confidence» that this amplification is real and it's based on nothing more than faster than expected surface temperature rise in the past few decades which can be TOTALLY explained by multi-decadal cyclic behavior in ocean currents, trade winds, and / or solar magnetic activity causing small global average albedo changes.