Not exact matches
The
global increase in ocean heat content during the period 1993 to 2003 in two ocean models constrained by assimilating altimetric sea level and other observations (Carton et al., 2005; Köhl et al., 2006) is considerably larger than these
observational estimates.
The
global increase in ocean heat content during the period 1993 to 2003 in two ocean models constrained by assimilating altimetric sea level and other observations (Carton et al., 2005; Köhl et al., 2006) is considerably larger than these
observational estimates.
Morice, C. P., J. J. Kennedy, N. A. Rayner, and P. D. Jones, 2012: Quantifying uncertainties in
global and regional temperature change using an ensemble of
observational estimates: The HadCRUT4 dataset.
Studies surveyed Millar, R. et al. (2017) Emission budgets and pathways consistent with limiting warming to 1.5 C, Nature Geophysics, doi: 10.1038 / ngeo3031 Matthews, H.D., et al. (2017)
Estimating Carbon Budgets for Ambitious Climate Targets, Current Climate Change Reports, doi: 10.1007 / s40641 -017-0055-0 Goodwin, P., et al. (2018) Pathways to 1.5 C and 2C warming based on
observational and geological constraints, Nature Geophysics, doi: 10.1038 / s41561 -017-0054-8 Schurer, A.P., et al. (2018) Interpretations of the Paris climate target, Nature Geophysics, doi: 10.1038 / s41561 -018-0086-8 Tokarska, K., and Gillett, N. (2018) Cumulative carbon emissions budgets consistent with 1.5 C
global warming, Nature Climate Change, doi: 10.1038 / s41558 -018-0118-9 Millar, R., and Friedlingstein, P. (2018) The utility of the historical record for assessing the transient climate response to cumulative emissions, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, doi: 10.1098 / rsta.2016.0449 Lowe, J.A., and Bernie, D. (2018) The impact of Earth system feedbacks on carbon budgets and climate response, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, doi: 10.1098 / rsta.2017.0263 Rogelj, J., et al. (2018) Scenarios towards limiting
global mean temperature increase below 1.5 C, Nature Climate Change, doi: 10.1038 / s41558 -018-0091-3 Kriegler, E., et al. (2018) Pathways limiting warming to 1.5 °C: A tale of turning around in no time, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, doi: 10.1098 / rsta.2016.0457
An independent
estimate of
global - mean evaporation provides additional support, but critical assumptions on relative humidity and the air - sea temperature difference changes are made that do not have adequate
observational basis and are inconsistent with climate models.»
Morice, C. P., J. J. Kennedy, N. A. Rayner, and P. D. Jones (2012), Quantifying uncertainties in
global and regional temperature change using an ensemble of
observational estimates: The HadCRUT4 dataset, J. Geophys.
First, we note that the mean
global power of atmospheric circulation
estimated from (5) is about 4 W m − 2, which is in close agreement with the best
observational estimates.
The bias in the other versions of the
global temperature record due to change in
observational platforms can be
estimated from the difference between the raw and adjusted HadSST3 data, and is shown in Figure 2.
The traditional
global mean radiative forcing provides no information about this regional structure, so many researchers have begun to present
estimates of radiative forcing on a regional scale as derived from models or
observational campaigns.
To better assess confidence in the different model
estimates of climate sensitivity, two kinds of
observational tests are available: tests related to the
global climate response associated with specified external forcings (discussed in Chapters 6, 9 and 10; Box 10.2) and tests focused on the simulation of key feedback processes.
Various mechanisms have been proposed for this hiatus in
global warming3, 4,5,6, but their relative importance has not been quantified, hampering
observational estimates of climate sensitivity.
The conclusion — taking the best
observational estimates of the change in decadal - average
global temperature between 1871 - 80 and 2002 - 11, and of the corresponding changes in forcing and ocean heat uptake — is this: A doubling of CO2 will lead to a warming of 1.6 ° -1.7 °C (2.9 ° -3.1 °F).