Not exact matches
The ability of the
oceans to take up carbon dioxide can not keep up with the rising levels of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, which means carbon dioxide and
global temperatures will
continue to increase unless humans cut their carbon dioxide emissions.
«Our research indicates that as
global warming
continues, parts of East Antarctica will also be affected by these wind - induced changes in
ocean currents and
temperatures,» Dr Jourdain said.
If
global surface
temperatures continue not to increase v quickly over the next decade or two then I think this could seriously slow down action to cut GHG emissions, no matter how well understood the «slow - down» is, and no matter how much additional heat is measured accumulatng in the
oceans.
Terrell Johnson, reporting on a recent NASA publication concluding that deep
ocean temperatures have not increased since 2005 (http://www.weather.com/science/environment/news/deep-
ocean-hasnt-warmed-nasa-20141007): «While the report's authors say the findings do not question the overall science of climate change, it is the latest in a series of findings that show
global warming to have slowed considerably during the 21st century, despite
continued rapid growth in human - produced greenhouse gas emissions during the same time.»
If the observed
global trends in
temperature rises
continue, there will be an increased probability of a recurrence of the phenomenon observed in 1998 on the coral reefs of the Indian
Ocean, as well as in other parts of the tropical
oceans in coming years.â $?
The study concludes significant correlation to
global warming
ocean temperatures continue to increase, and that further studies «this decline will need to be considered in future studies of marine ecosystems, geochemical cycling,
ocean circulation and fisheries.»
They conclude that while the rate of increase of average
global surface
temperatures has slowed since 1998, melting of Arctic ice, rising sea levels, and warming
oceans have
continued apace.
In the absence of changes to other climate forcings and assuming
continued rise of CO2 AGW would be falsified by falling / static
ocean heat content or falling / static
global average
temperature.
We conclude that
global temperature continued to rise rapidly in the past decade, despite large year - to - year fluctuations associated with the El Niño - La Niña cycle of tropical
ocean temperature.
I'm very convinced that the physical process of
global warming is
continuing, which appears as a statistically significant increase of the
global surface and tropospheric
temperature anomaly over a time scale of about 20 years and longer and also as trends in other climate variables (e.g.,
global ocean heat content increase, Arctic and Antarctic ice decrease, mountain glacier decrease on average and others), and I don't see any scientific evidence according to which this trend has been broken, recently.
To point out just a couple of things: —
oceans warming slower (or cooling slower) than lands on long - time trends is absolutely normal, because water is more difficult both to warm or to cool (I mean, we require both a bigger heat flow and more time); at the contrary, I see as a non-sense theory (made by some serrist, but don't know who) that
oceans are storing up heat, and that suddenly they will release such heat as a positive feedback: or the water warms than no heat can be considered ad «stored» (we have no phase change inside
oceans, so no latent heat) or
oceans begin to release heat but in the same time they have to cool (because they are losing heat); so, I don't feel strange that in last years land
temperatures for some series (NCDC and GISS) can be heating up while
oceans are slightly cooling, but I feel strange that they are heating up so much to reverse
global trend from slightly negative / stable to slightly positive; but, in the end, all this is not an evidence that lands» warming is led by UHI (but, this effect, I would not exclude it from having a small part in
temperature trends for some regional area, but just small); both because, as writtend, it is normal to have waters warming slower than lands, and because lands»
temperatures are often measured in a not so precise way (despite they
continue to give us a
global uncertainity in TT values which is barely the instrumental's one)-- but, to point out, HadCRU and MSU of last years (I mean always 2002 - 2006) follow much better waters»
temperatures trend; — metropolis and larger cities
temperature trends actually show an increase in UHI effect, but I think the sites are few, and the covered area is very small worldwide, so the
global effect is very poor (but it still can be sensible for regional effects); but I would not run out a small warming trend for airport measurements due mainly to three things: increasing jet planes traffic, enlarging airports (then more buildings and more asphalt — if you follow motor sports, or simply live in a town / city, you will know how easy they get very warmer than air during day, and how much it can slow night - time cooling) and overall having airports nearer to cities (if not becoming an area inside the city after some decade of hurban growth, e.g. Milan - Linate); — I found no point about UHI in towns and villages; you will tell me they are not large cities; but, in comparison with 20-40-60 years ago when they were «countryside», many small towns and villages have become part of larger hurban areas (at least in Europe and Asia) so examining just larger cities would not be enough in my opinion to get a full view of UHI effect (still remembering that it has a small
global effect: we can say many matters are due to UHI instead of GW, maybe even that a small part of measured GW is due to UHI, and that GW measurements are not so precise to make us able to make good analisyses and predictions, but not that GW is due to UHI).
The IPCC report and its publicity statements deliberately distort the
continued ocean temperature rise by conflating it with «
global warming» when it is merely the transfer of air heat into the
oceans from the
temperature rise prior to 1998, not CO2 induced air warming since 1998.
This time period is too short to signify a change in the warming trend, as climate trends are measured over periods of decades, not years.12, 29,30,31,32 Such decade - long slowdowns or even reversals in trend have occurred before in the
global instrumental record (for example, 1900 - 1910 and 1940 - 1950; see Figure 2.2), including three decade - long periods since 1970, each followed by a sharp
temperature rise.33 Nonetheless, satellite and
ocean observations indicate that the Earth - atmosphere climate system has
continued to gain heat energy.34
Dead zones — massive stratified columns of oxygen - deprived water — could become the new normal in
oceans around the world as
global temperatures continue to rise.
Importantly, these trends can largely be explained by increases in mean
ocean temperatures, suggesting that we can expect further increases in marine heatwave days under
continued global warming.»
If the
oceans continue to cool so will the
global temperatures and this should put an end to the
global warming hype.
Unfortunately using
global average surface air
temperatures as a measure of total warming ignores the fact that most of the heat (more than 93 %) goes into our
oceans, which
continue to warm without any sign of a pause, as you can see below.
While the increase in
global temperature could indeed be stopped within decades by reducing emissions,
ocean heat content will
continue to increase for at least a thousand years after we have reached zero emissions.
«El Nino leftover warm water pools drift into different parts of the
oceans and
continue to warm for years» Yet after the 1998 El Nino
global temperatures plummeted.
«Take unusually warm Atlantic
ocean surface
temperatures (
temperatures are in the 70s off the coast of Virginia), add a cold Arctic outbreak (something we'll
continue to get even as
global warming proceeds), mix them together and you get huge amounts of energy and moisture, and monster snowfalls, like we're about to see here,» said Michael Mann, a climate researcher who directs Penn State University's earth systems science center.
These datasets include: NOAA Optimum Interpolation 1/4 Degree Daily Sea Surface
Temperature (OISST) Analysis, Version 2 AVHRR Pathfinder Version 5.2 Level 3 Collated (L3C)
Global 4 km Sea Surface
Temperature (SST) Climate Data Record (CDR) for 1981 - 2010 NOAA Climate Data Record (CDR) of Gridded Satellite Data from ISCCP B1 (GridSat - B1) 11 micron Brightness
Temperature, Version 2 NCDC Storm Events Database Coastal Economic Trends for Coastal Geographies Demographic Trends (1970 - 2010) for Coastal Geographies FEMA HAZUS Critical Facilities for Coastal Geographies Time - Series Data for Self - Employed Economic Activity Dependent on the
Ocean and Great Lakes Economy for Counties, States, and the Nation between 2005 and 2012 Time - Series Data on the
Ocean and Great Lakes Economy for Counties, States, and the Nation between 2005 and 2012 (Sector and Industry Level) Time - Series Data on the
Ocean and Great Lakes Economy for Counties, States, and the Nation between 2005 and 2012 (Sector Level)...
Continued
Despite large year - to - year fluctuations associated with the El Niño - La Niña cycle of tropical
ocean temperature, the conclusion could be made that
global temperature continued to rise rapidly in the 21st century, new record heights being reached in every decade.
Global average air
temperatures have increased relatively slowly since a high point in 1998 caused by the
ocean phenomenon El Niño, but observations show that heat is
continuing to be trapped in increasing amounts by greenhouse gases, with over 90 % disappearing into the
oceans.