Not exact matches
But as climate patterns become less predictable and
global ocean temperatures rise, the
water temperature readings identified by the Rutgers team might bring to light similar patterns that will allow forecasters to adjust their intensity forecasts accordingly.
Despite slower
temperature shifts in
ocean waters,
ocean life from plankton to fish have begun moving in response to
global warming
Antarctica was also more sensitive to
global carbon dioxide levels, Cuffey said, which increased as the
global temperature increased because of changing
ocean currents that caused upwelling of carbon - dioxide - rich
waters from the depths of the
ocean.
However, in the 2013 Fifth Assessment Report (AR5), the IPCC concluded that «Modelling indicates that SRM methods, if realizable, have the potential to substantially offset a
global temperature rise, but they would also modify the
global water cycle, and would not reduce
ocean acidification.»
By next year, the Argo project will have installed 3,000 floating sensors across all the
oceans, offering a daily snapshot of
global patterns of
water temperature and salinity — crucial for predicting the nature and pace of climate change.
«When we included projected Antarctic wind shifts in a detailed
global ocean model, we found
water up to 4 °C warmer than current
temperatures rose up to meet the base of the Antarctic ice shelves,» said lead author Dr Paul Spence from the ARC Centre of Excellence for Climate System Science (ARCCSS).
Water's enormous heat - carrying capacity allows the atmosphere and
ocean currents to balance
global temperatures.
«Atlantic / Pacific
ocean temperature difference fuels US wildfires: New study shows that difference in
water temperature between the Pacific and the Atlantic
oceans together with
global warming impact the risk of drought and wildfire in southwestern North America.»
Water changes
temperature more slowly than the air or land, which means the
global ocean heat is likely to persist for some time.
The rise in
global sea levels has accelerated since the 1990s amid rising
temperatures, with a thaw of Greenland's ice sheet pouring ever more
water into the
oceans, scientists said this week.
A new paper from the Sea Around Us Project published in the journal Nature reveals that warmer
ocean temperatures are driving marine species towards cooler, deeper
waters, and this in turn, has affected
global fisheries catches.
The CDR potential and possible environmental side effects are estimated for various COA deployment scenarios, assuming olivine as the alkalinity source in ice ‐ free coastal
waters (about 8.6 % of the
global ocean's surface area), with dissolution rates being a function of grain size, ambient seawater
temperature, and pH. Our results indicate that for a large ‐ enough olivine deployment of small ‐ enough grain sizes (10 µm), atmospheric CO2 could be reduced by more than 800 GtC by the year 2100.
There is a clear impact on
global temperature, too, though the mechanisms are complex: heat released from the
oceans; increases in
water vapor, which enhance the greenhouse effect, and redistributions of clouds.
In addition, since the
global surface
temperature records are a measure that responds to albedo changes (volcanic aerosols, cloud cover, land use, snow and ice cover) solar output, and differences in partition of various forcings into the
oceans / atmosphere / land / cryosphere, teasing out just the effect of CO2 +
water vapor over the short term is difficult to impossible.
[1] CO2 absorbs IR, is the main GHG, human emissions are increasing its concentration in the atmosphere, raising
temperatures globally; the second GHG,
water vapor, exists in equilibrium with
water / ice, would precipitate out if not for the CO2, so acts as a feedback; since the
oceans cover so much of the planet,
water is a large positive feedback; melting snow and ice as the atmosphere warms decreases albedo, another positive feedback, biased toward the poles, which gives larger polar warming than the
global average; decreasing the
temperature gradient from the equator to the poles is reducing the driving forces for the jetstream; the jetstream's meanders are increasing in amplitude and slowing, just like the lower Missippi River where its driving gradient decreases; the larger slower meanders increase the amplitude and duration of blocking highs, increasing drought and extreme
temperatures — and 30,000 + Europeans and 5,000 plus Russians die, and the US corn crop, Russian wheat crop, and Aussie wildland fire protection fails — or extreme rainfall floods the US, France, Pakistan, Thailand (driving up prices for disk drives — hows that for unexpected adverse impacts from AGW?)
Long waves (infrared) light from the sun, GHGs, clouds, are trapped at the surface of the
oceans, directly leading to increased «skin»
temperature, more
water vapor (a very effective GHG), faster convection (with more loss of heat to space in the tropics),... How each of them converts to real regional /
global temperature increases / decreases is another point of discussion...
Human
water vapour emissions are irrelevant, as
water vapour is in dynamic equilibrium with
ocean water, an equilibrium controlled by
global mean
temperature, i.e., other greenhouse gases etc..
These record
temperatures have been assisted by a very strong El Niño event, which brought warm
water to the
ocean surface, temporarily warming
global surface
temperatures.
If scientists need to rely on bucket samples of
water to prove the historic
global temperature of our
oceans, perhaps it is time to recognise that there are some aspects of our climate data that are not worth relying on.
Global temperatures tend to decrease in the wake of La Niña, which occurs when upwelling cold
water off the coast of Peru spreads westward in the equatorial Pacific
Ocean.
Water takes longer to heat up and cool down than does the air or land, so
ocean warming is considered to be a better indicator of
global warming than measurements of
global atmospheric
temperatures at the Earth's surface.
Its seven chapters discuss the
global climate models, forcings and feedbacks, solar forcing of the climate, and observations on
temperature, the icecaps, the
water cycle and
oceans, and weather.»
It seemsthe observed increase in trade winds lead to the surfacing of cooler
waters in the Eastern Pacific
ocean and this phenomenon is found by models to cause
global average
temperatures to cool.
Furthermore, from a
global perspective, the carbon emissions from burning coal threaten the reef by accelerating
ocean acidification and rising
water temperature, which can lead to coral die - offs.
- ARAMATE (The reconstruction of ecosystem and climate variability in the north Atlantic region using annually resolved archives of marine and terrestrial ecosystems)- CLIM - ARCH-DATE (Integration of high resolution climate archives with archaeological and documentary evidence for the precise dating of maritime cultural and climatic events)- CLIVASH2k (Climate variability in Antarctica and Southern Hemisphere in the past 2000 years)- CoralHydro2k (Tropical
ocean hydroclimate and
temperature from coral archives)-
Global T CFR (Global gridded temperature reconstruction method comparisons)- GMST reconstructions - Iso2k (A global synthesis of Common Era hydroclimate using water isotopes)- MULTICHRON (Constraining modeled multidecadal climate variability in the Atlantic using proxies derived from marine bivalve shells and coralline algae)- PALEOLINK (The missing link in the Past — Downscaling paleoclimatic Earth System Models)- PSR2k (Proxy Surrogate Reconstructi
Global T CFR (
Global gridded temperature reconstruction method comparisons)- GMST reconstructions - Iso2k (A global synthesis of Common Era hydroclimate using water isotopes)- MULTICHRON (Constraining modeled multidecadal climate variability in the Atlantic using proxies derived from marine bivalve shells and coralline algae)- PALEOLINK (The missing link in the Past — Downscaling paleoclimatic Earth System Models)- PSR2k (Proxy Surrogate Reconstructi
Global gridded
temperature reconstruction method comparisons)- GMST reconstructions - Iso2k (A
global synthesis of Common Era hydroclimate using water isotopes)- MULTICHRON (Constraining modeled multidecadal climate variability in the Atlantic using proxies derived from marine bivalve shells and coralline algae)- PALEOLINK (The missing link in the Past — Downscaling paleoclimatic Earth System Models)- PSR2k (Proxy Surrogate Reconstructi
global synthesis of Common Era hydroclimate using
water isotopes)- MULTICHRON (Constraining modeled multidecadal climate variability in the Atlantic using proxies derived from marine bivalve shells and coralline algae)- PALEOLINK (The missing link in the Past — Downscaling paleoclimatic Earth System Models)- PSR2k (Proxy Surrogate Reconstruction 2k)
The deep meaning in
Global Temperature for me is the wondrous observation that, in order for life to evolve on planet earth, over four billion years, it seems as if we have never been either completely ice - free or without some open
water across the
oceans.
From the article: A new study released Monday found that warming
temperatures in Pacific
Ocean waters off the coast of North America over the past century closely followed natural changes in the wind, not increases in greenhouse gases related to
global warming.
Use of this type of modeling allows for better understanding of the effects of OTEC deployment in
global phenomena (changes in
water temperature and its effect on atmosphere -
ocean interaction or
global warming, to name some).
Having a high humidity allows
ocean to get highest surface
temperature, but less humidity would allow
ocean store energy in form of
water vapor [which allow more energy to stored in terms energy of earth's
global budget].
So how our environmental future plays out now is that as the poles melt, the
ocean heats, and
water surface area increases, atmospheric H2O skyrockets and some time later as the
temperature passes through 4 deg C heading for 5 deg C
global temperature rise, the
ocean currents start to stall.
Global surface
temperatures in the last few years have received a bump in recent years because of a large El Niñ0 event, which brought warm
water up from the depths of the Pacific
ocean and released the energy into the atmosphere.
This is so because climate change has already caused changes to the
global climate system such as raising
ocean temperatures and increasing the amount of
water in the atmosphere.
In addition to rising
temperatures, the report discussed a variety of «other possible effects of an increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide», including melting of the Antarctic ice cap, rise of sea level, warming of sea
water, increased acidity of fresh
waters (which also applies to the danger of
ocean acidification,
global warming's evil twin), and an increase in plant photosynthesis.
``... the
water vapor is in equilibrium with the
ocean temperature that has risen less than the
global temperature, so its response relative to the
global temperature may be less than 7 % per degree, while it is 7 % per degree for the
ocean.»
Despite higher than normal surface
temperatures and heat contents of
ocean waters where the storms developed, evidence is lacking that
global warming is revving them up.
Using the NOAA's high - resolution
ocean temperature dataset, the chart above reveals the absolute non-existence of «accelerating»
global warming, for all the world's
oceans, and for those tropical
waters that NASA predicts we will witness boiling.
Ragnaar, the
water vapor is in equilibrium with the
ocean temperature that has risen less than the
global temperature, so its response relative to the
global temperature may be less than 7 % per degree, while it is 7 % per degree for the
ocean.
To point out just a couple of things: —
oceans warming slower (or cooling slower) than lands on long - time trends is absolutely normal, because
water is more difficult both to warm or to cool (I mean, we require both a bigger heat flow and more time); at the contrary, I see as a non-sense theory (made by some serrist, but don't know who) that
oceans are storing up heat, and that suddenly they will release such heat as a positive feedback: or the
water warms than no heat can be considered ad «stored» (we have no phase change inside
oceans, so no latent heat) or
oceans begin to release heat but in the same time they have to cool (because they are losing heat); so, I don't feel strange that in last years land
temperatures for some series (NCDC and GISS) can be heating up while
oceans are slightly cooling, but I feel strange that they are heating up so much to reverse
global trend from slightly negative / stable to slightly positive; but, in the end, all this is not an evidence that lands» warming is led by UHI (but, this effect, I would not exclude it from having a small part in
temperature trends for some regional area, but just small); both because, as writtend, it is normal to have
waters warming slower than lands, and because lands»
temperatures are often measured in a not so precise way (despite they continue to give us a
global uncertainity in TT values which is barely the instrumental's one)-- but, to point out, HadCRU and MSU of last years (I mean always 2002 - 2006) follow much better
waters»
temperatures trend; — metropolis and larger cities
temperature trends actually show an increase in UHI effect, but I think the sites are few, and the covered area is very small worldwide, so the
global effect is very poor (but it still can be sensible for regional effects); but I would not run out a small warming trend for airport measurements due mainly to three things: increasing jet planes traffic, enlarging airports (then more buildings and more asphalt — if you follow motor sports, or simply live in a town / city, you will know how easy they get very warmer than air during day, and how much it can slow night - time cooling) and overall having airports nearer to cities (if not becoming an area inside the city after some decade of hurban growth, e.g. Milan - Linate); — I found no point about UHI in towns and villages; you will tell me they are not large cities; but, in comparison with 20-40-60 years ago when they were «countryside», many small towns and villages have become part of larger hurban areas (at least in Europe and Asia) so examining just larger cities would not be enough in my opinion to get a full view of UHI effect (still remembering that it has a small
global effect: we can say many matters are due to UHI instead of GW, maybe even that a small part of measured GW is due to UHI, and that GW measurements are not so precise to make us able to make good analisyses and predictions, but not that GW is due to UHI).
Dead zones — massive stratified columns of oxygen - deprived
water — could become the new normal in
oceans around the world as
global temperatures continue to rise.
Reports show the
ocean's unique ecosystems are adapting to fluctuation in
water temperatures likely caused by
global warming, but increasing acidic levels may prove fatal for the world's coral reefs.
As
global temperature increases, thermal expansion of
ocean water and melting of glaciers occur.
A slight change of
ocean temperature (after a delay caused by the high specific heat of
water, the annual mixing of thermocline
waters with deeper
waters in storms) ensures that rising CO2 reduces infrared absorbing H2O vapour while slightly increasing cloud cover (thus Earth's albedo), as evidenced by the fact that the NOAA data from 1948 - 2008 shows a fall in
global humidity (not the positive feedback rise presumed by NASA's models!)
The Pacific, and what happens in local
waters in its east and west is the focus of ENSO studies and these phenomena are commonly compared to the march in
global temperatures but its what happens in the
global ocean that is really important for
temperature gain and loss on a
global basis.
We know that as the
global average
temperature rises, more
water evaporates from the
oceans.
The potential spoiler is the cyclical El Nino event: a band of unusually warm
ocean water that periodically forms along the equatorial Pacific Ocean and drives up global temperat
ocean water that periodically forms along the equatorial Pacific
Ocean and drives up global temperat
Ocean and drives up
global temperatures.
It is not «conduction» but exchange of radiation; if you keep your hands parallel at a distance of some cm the right hand does not (radiatively) «warm» the left hand or vice versa albeit at 33 °C skin
temperature they exchange some hundreds of W / m ² (about 500 W / m ²) The solar radiation reaching the surface (for 71 % of the surface, the
oceans) is lost by evaporation (or evapotranspiration of the vegetation), plus some convection (20 W / ²) and some radiation reaching the cosmos directly through the window 8µm to 12 µm (about 20 W / m ² «
global» average); only the radiative heat flow surface to air (absorbed by the air) is negligible (plus or minus); the non radiative (latent heat, sensible heat) are transferred for surface to air and compensate for a part of the heat lost to the cosmos by the upper layer of the
water vapour displayed on figure 6 - C.
Global surface
temperatures were the 8th or 9th highest recorded, partly because the first two months were cool - ish thanks to a La Nina in the Pacific, where cooler
waters sit on the top of the
ocean and suck up heat from the atmosphere.
Figure 15 - A has shown the
global pacing by the El Niños (and their tele - connections) of the
temperature changes of the lower troposphere as function of both time and latitude; this pacing may be due to the coming to the surface, at high latitudes, of warm
water from the Pacific warm pool, as they move to higher latitudes on the western rim of the
oceans after an El Niño.
ANSWER: There is not «A»
temperature of the
oceans but a constantly changing distribution of
temperatures and of partial pressures of the gases; figure 17 - D from the Publications Office of the European Union gives a
global view with some time averaging: it is anywhere between 280 µatm and 430 µatm in the
water!
Global climate change has contributed to the higher sea surface and sub-surface
ocean temperatures, a warmer and moister atmosphere above the
ocean, higher
water levels around the globe, and perhaps more precipitation in storms.»