(And
the global oil problem isn't made significantly worse either.)
Not exact matches
«
Oil isn't Canada's only
problem,» says Steven Englander,
global head of G10 currency strategy at Citibank in New York.
Among the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially are the following: (1) worldwide economic, political, and capital markets conditions and other factors beyond the Company's control, including natural and other disasters or climate change affecting the operations of the Company or its customers and suppliers; (2) the Company's credit ratings and its cost of capital; (3) competitive conditions and customer preferences; (4) foreign currency exchange rates and fluctuations in those rates; (5) the timing and market acceptance of new product offerings; (6) the availability and cost of purchased components, compounds, raw materials and energy (including
oil and natural gas and their derivatives) due to shortages, increased demand or supply interruptions (including those caused by natural and other disasters and other events); (7) the impact of acquisitions, strategic alliances, divestitures, and other unusual events resulting from portfolio management actions and other evolving business strategies, and possible organizational restructuring; (8) generating fewer productivity improvements than estimated; (9) unanticipated
problems or delays with the phased implementation of a
global enterprise resource planning (ERP) system, or security breaches and other disruptions to the Company's information technology infrastructure; (10) financial market risks that may affect the Company's funding obligations under defined benefit pension and postretirement plans; and (11) legal proceedings, including significant developments that could occur in the legal and regulatory proceedings described in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10 - K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017, and any subsequent quarterly reports on Form 10 - Q (the «Reports»).
Problems in China, the world's second largest economy, can crimp
global growth, a big concern at a time when weak
oil prices and geopolitical concerns are also clouding the outlook.
At the root of today's
problem is
global demand that is no longer growing quickly enough to support the prices necessary to keep expanding expensive unconventional sources of supply like the
oil sands.
The
problem with this argument is that what is good for
oil producers and exporters is inversely bad for major
oil consumers and importers like the United States, Europe, and China in this zero sum game of
global energy markets.
As you can see in the table above, which looks at the price differential between the Brent
global benchmark price and the West Texas Intermediate price (the amount by which North American
oil prices differ from average international prices each year), the
problem is that the price differential between 2011 and 2013 was exceptional.
We spoke of the
global dimension of the social organisation of society, of the political not only the economic dimension of the
problem of the
problem of refugees throughout the world, the process of democratisation, the
problem of private property, of taxation, of the
problem of unemployment, of the state, of
oil and its significance for the Gulf War, of the question of the right to live and of nuclear apartheid etc..
We also know that the fall of the price of
oil, which is a
global problem, is also responsible for the fall of the naira.
Hydrogen could therefore help ease pressing environmental and societal
problems, including air pollution and its health hazards,
global climate change and dependence on foreign
oil imports.
Solutions to environmental
problems ranging from
global warming to peak
oil — and how the environment is playing a role in this year's elections
Burning fossil fuels like coal, natural gas and
oil to heat and cool our buildings and run our vehicles takes a heavy toll on the environment, contributing significantly to both local
problems like elevated particulate levels and
global ones like a warming climate.
«
Oil spills are a
global problem and wreak havoc on our aquatic ecosystems, not to mention cost billions of dollars in damage,» Chen said.
I wish we spend more time debating the
problem of
oil depletion, which is much more meaningful and relevant, rather than
global warming, which is irrelevant and meaningless and purely hypothetical.
Global Climate Coalition dissolves as many corporations grapple with threat of warming, but
oil lobby convinces US administration to deny
problem.
Over 50
global problems (including climate change, rogue satellites, chemical warfare, massive
oil spills, tsunamis, and ethnic and religious conflict) can be unraveled and solved.
That, for me, affords an opening, given that any «solution» to the
global warming
problem implicitly involves using energy more carefully and finding abundant non-polluting sources that can compete with coal and
oil.
2000 The
Global Climate Coalition dissolves as many corporations grapple with the threat of warming, but the
oil lobby convinces the U.S. administration to deny a
problem exists.
I've said countless times that peak
oil and
global warming are imminent and extremely serious
problems, and yet people keep assuming that because I'm not predicting the fall of modern civilization in 10 years that I think it's all not that big a deal.
The
oil sands are still a tiny part of the world's carbon
problem — they account for less than a tenth of one percent of
global CO2 emissions — but to many environmentalists they are the thin end of the wedge, the first step along a path that could lead to other, even dirtier sources of
oil: producing it from
oil shale or coal.
As I wrote the other day, it looks like countries are going to remain focused on addressing real - time
problems related to energy security (most notably high
oil prices) for the time being, even as evidence builds that
global warming could fuel turmoil, particularly in already - troubled places like sub-Saharan Africa, in the long run.
I find that even some of my most informed friends, people who explain to me what really happened with various space and aircraft disasters based on their own critical review of the available information on the subject, have
problems discussing topics like
global climate change, the end of
oil as a fuel, because they haven't even asked some obvious questions, much less done any research.
If we truly are to confront
global warming, the approach of peak
oil, and a host of looming
problems, then, as Lester Brown has suggested, «The challenge is to redesign communities, making public transportation the center - piece of urban transport and making streets pedestrian and bicyle friendly.»
I honestly think she's too young to be listening to me going on and on about such confusing stuff as
oil, gas, coal, greenhouse effect,
global warming, manmade climate change, population explosion (she knows about it), deforestation, desertification, rapid extinction of other species, pollution,
problems, overconsumption, overindustrialization,
problems, politics, economics, consumerism, and
problems, religion, war, etc., etc., etc..
To echo Lawrence Brown's comments in 223, the
problem is U.S.
global security is predicated on keeping
oil flowing to maintain the way of life that exists here.
If we truly are to confront
global warming, the approach of peak
oil, and a host of looming
problems, then, as Lester Brown has suggested, «The challenge is to redesign communities, making public transportation the center - piece of urban transport and making streets pedestrian and bicycle friendly.»
«Other
oil producing feedstock such as corn and sugarcane often destroy vital farmlands and rainforests, disrupt
global food supplies and create new environmental
problems.
You couldn't be more right, Andrew, with the following statement: «If we truly are to confront
global warming, the approach of peak
oil, and a host of looming
problems, then, as Lester Brown has suggested, «The challenge is to redesign communities, making public transportation the center - piece of urban transport and making streets pedestrian and bicycle friendly.»»
He did not envisage
problems with
global oil supplies due to the Libyan conflict and unrest in other Arab states, which have sent crude prices to two - year highs near $ 120 per barrel.
While vast
global coal reserves make this question more neutral with regard to carbon per se, it a more complete socio - politico - economic experiment nonetheless to examine how good we have been at steering the oceanliner of energy policy with regard to foreign
oil in the United States, obviously a more simple
problem than all fossil fuels together.
When the reports warning of
global warming first appeared, and the prescription was essentially the same as in the 1970s — stop using cars,
oil is bad, man is the
problem, eat your veggies etc. — I began to smell a rat.
The
oil industry argues, however, that there is little precedent for using common law to address a complex
global problem like climate change.
The fundamental argument from the
oil companies is that climate change is a
global problem that needs a political solution, and you can't solve a political
problem in court and you certainly can't blame the
oil companies for selling a product that everyone wants to buy.
Oil companies are expected to argue human greenhouse gas emissions were the main driver of recent
global warming and that it is a
problem, but their legal filings contest their liability and the use of courts to settle what's considered a
global matter.
«Savings and investment boost economic growth, but when it comes to energy,
global warming threatens as a major
problem and our dependence on Middle Eastern
oil damages our foreign policy.
Our meeting has been held at a time of higher and volatile
oil prices, continuing increases in
global oil demand, localised supply
problems for some forms of energy, concern about long term security of supply and increasing attention to the environmental impact from energy use.
We can choose to transition to a clean energy economy that addresses a multitude of challenges —
oil dependency, energy security,
global warming, air pollution — or we can choose to ignore these
problems.
The first recently unveiled
global satellite survey of gas flaring — a process commonly used to dispose of natural gas freed during
oil production — has shown what many have now suspected for years: it is an extremely wasteful, costly
problem that has helped contribute to
global warming.
«Palm
oil is not the defining ingredient — there is an immediate affinity between cocoa and chocolate in a way there just isn't with palm
oil,» said Jonathan Horrell, director of
global sustainability for Mondelez Foods, at a recent roundtable held in the UK to discuss the palm
oil problem.
That seems the clearest statement yet of the real
problem == is there anything that can replace current levels of air pollution, if high sulfur coal and
oil are phased out for respiratory health reasons, that would make up for the loss of the aerosols» negative forcing on
global temperature?
Even if you do not accept
global warming and do not see the point of reducing the production of greenhouse gases, what is your solution for the peak
oil problem?
2000
Global Climate Coalition dissolves as many corporations grapple with threat of warming, but
oil lobby convinces US administration to deny
problem.
The solution to both the
global warming and peak
oil problems is converting to renewable energy ASAP.
However, the
problem of determining where specifically within a given causal chain to assign moral responsibility to individual members is a
problem endemic to any collective action whatsoever, from the Challenger disaster, to the BP
oil spill, to
global poverty.