Doubling of the carbon dioxide concentration will cause
global plant photosynthesis to increase by about one third, according to a paper published in the journal Nature.
Intriguingly, between September 1997 and August 2000, the team found,
global plant photosynthesis increased.
Not exact matches
Photosynthesis — the process green
plants use to convert energy from the sun that
plants use to grow — from tropical forests, plays a huge role in determining
global atmospheric CO2 concentration, which is closely linked the
global temperature and rate of climate change.
For example, he said, most participants recognized that carbon dioxide increases
global temperatures, yet mistakenly indicated that rising levels of atmospheric CO2 are expected to «reduce
photosynthesis in
plants.»
In the College of Sciences, Professor Gerald Edwards works on the effects of environmental stress and
global climate change on carbon acquisition and usage in
photosynthesis of higher
plants, with current research focusing on a novel type of
photosynthesis.
And as to his claim that there may be «places around the world where
global warming will lead to less crop success and yield, even when taking into account the carbon dioxide fertilization effect,» he appears to be equally ignorant that rising levels of atmospheric CO2 tend to raise the temperature of optimum
plant photosynthesis beyond the predicted temperature values associated with
global warming, effectively nullifying this worn out claim (Idso & Idso, 2011).
Due to the tendency of
plants to use the lighter form of carbon during
photosynthesis, the change in the ratio of heavy carbon to light carbon in the atmosphere reflects a massive increase in
global plant growth.
The letter describes
global warming as a natural phenomenon, and expresses how carbon dioxide is a «non-polluting gas that is essential to
plant photosynthesis.»
In addition to rising temperatures, the report discussed a variety of «other possible effects of an increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide», including melting of the Antarctic ice cap, rise of sea level, warming of sea water, increased acidity of fresh waters (which also applies to the danger of ocean acidification,
global warming's evil twin), and an increase in
plant photosynthesis.
Here's Merriam Webster's version: Main Entry: carbon dioxide Function: noun: a heavy colorless gas CO 2 that does not support combustion, dissolves in water to form carbonic acid, is formed especially in animal respiration and in the decay or combustion of animal and vegetable matter, is absorbed from the air by
plants in
photosynthesis, and is used in the carbonation of beverages I know you'll all correct me if i'm wrong in stating if CO2 has no scientific facts supporting
global warming based upon a factor of greenhouse gases (as opposed to solar radiation in another post, which would be defined by variations in earth, space, or similar factors), then where does science determine that CO2 «disolves in water to form carbonic acid» and is «absorbed from the air by
plants in photosythesis»?
There are two primary externalities that result from our emissions of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere — 1) an enhancement of the greenhouse effect, which results in an alteration of the energy flow in the earth's climate and a general tendency to warm the
global average surface temperature, and 2) an enhancement of the rate of
photosynthesis in
plants and a general tendency to result in more efficient growth and an overall healthier condition of vegetation (including crops).
Meanwhile, Obama can also scare the masses and control them by blaming CO2 (a harmless gas that
plants need for
photosynthesis) for being the cause behind
global warming.