Sentences with phrase «global report argues»

The world's 20 largest economies need to increase their 2030 climate commitments six-fold to keep within the two - degree warming curb agreed at the Paris summit, and Australia is among the worst laggards, a new global report argues.

Not exact matches

The proposal has generated a great deal of often vitriolic debate over the future of the wheat board, and the C.D. Howe Institute recently weighed in with a report arguing that global grain markets have changed significantly over the past few decades, to the point that the CWB is more often than not a price taker.

A recent report from S&P Global argued that promoting the entry and retention of more women in the workforce in the U.S., particularly in STEM fields, could create a «substantial growth opportunity,» with the potential to add 5 % to 10 % to nominal GDP in a just few decades.

Hot air It was «widely reported» that the UK broadcasting regulator had deemed Channel 4's The Great Global Warming Swindle «unfair, biased and totally misleading,» Lorne Gunter argues in the National Post, but in fact it ruled that the documentary did «not materially mislead» viewers.

In a new report, GRAIN outlines the contributions of industrial meat and dairy to global climate change, arguing that reducing their production and consumption is one of the most important actions we can take to address the climate crisis now.

The report argues a reluctance to take the radical changes needed to address the root causes of instability has led to rising support for political Islam, the re-emergence of the Taliban in Afghanistan, increasing global terror attacks and the a «state of bloody chaos nearing civil war» in Iraq.

Now that some global warming is a foregone conclusion, the U.S. must develop strategies to adapt argues a new government report

The report outlines 10 measures or «transformative actions» its authors argue are essential to curb global warming, particularly over the next 15 years, when the global economy is expected to undergo what the authors call a «deep structural transformation.»

LONDON — Governments shouldn't wait for a proposed international climate deal to take hold in 2020 — they can take four steps right away to curb carbon emissions, argues a new report from a global energy think tank.

The report argues that existing programs aimed at helping countries deal with climate change don't deal directly with gender issues, and maintains that global financing mechanisms need to specifically address the rights of girls.

In 2014 alone, reports from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the International Energy Agency, the UN Sustainable Solutions Network and the Global Commission on the Economy and Climate argued for a doubling or trebling of nuclear energy — requiring as many as 1,000 new reactors or more in view of scheduled retirements — to stabilize carbon emissions e.g. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Working Group III — Mitigation of Climate Change, http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg3/, Presentation, slides 32 - 33; International Energy Agency, World Energy Outlook 2014, p. 396; UN Sustainable Solutions Network, «Pathways to Deep Decarbonization» (July 2014), at page 33; Global Commission on the Economy and Climate, «Better Growth, Better Climate: The New Climate Economy Report» (September 2014), Figure 5 at page 26.

This set of messaging and all «reports» to back this line, all appear to be coming from one organization, the Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change, and specifically from its chairman and former president, Craig Idso, one of the NIPCC's lead authors, who has been arguing the same «C02 is beneficial» line for nearly 20 years, along with his father, Sherwood Idso.

Regardless of whether the IMF report gets to exactly the right number, the report provides a very credible starting point to argue over the right value to place on fossil fuel subsidies, and will be a baseline to begin rethinking the right pace for our global transition to clean energy.

Carlin's report argued that the information the EPA was using was out of date, and that even as atmospheric carbon dioxide levels have increased, global temperatures have declined.

The report argues that «60 - 80 % of coal, oil and gas reserves of publicly listed companies are «unburnable» if the world is to have a chance of not exceeding global warming of 2 °C.»

Tsinghua University public policy professor Hu AnGang (pictured right) argues that China stands much to gain, both economically and diplomatically, in imposing absolute emissions targets, even if the likes of the US continue to hold out in the global climate negotiations, reports Reuters.

People arguing for human - caused global warming use these differences to select a record that supports their position, and that is what the mainstream media reports.

The GWPF report, entitled «Oversensitive: How the IPCC hid good the news on global warming», argues the UN's official climate body glossed over the possibility of modest future warming in its latest assessment, in favour of evidence that the risks could be much higher.

Climate change skeptics claimed the IPCC 2007 report — the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report (IPCC 2007), which uses scientific facts to argue humans are causing climate change — was based on an alleged bias for positive results by editors and peer reviewers of scientific journals; editors and scientists were accused of suppressing research that did not support the paradigm for carbon dioxide - induced global wareport — the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report (IPCC 2007), which uses scientific facts to argue humans are causing climate change — was based on an alleged bias for positive results by editors and peer reviewers of scientific journals; editors and scientists were accused of suppressing research that did not support the paradigm for carbon dioxide - induced global waReport (IPCC 2007), which uses scientific facts to argue humans are causing climate change — was based on an alleged bias for positive results by editors and peer reviewers of scientific journals; editors and scientists were accused of suppressing research that did not support the paradigm for carbon dioxide - induced global warming.

Blogs and other articles argued incorrectly that a report, the «Global Review of Forest Fires,» should not have been cited as a reference, because

As if this were not daunting enough, in 2002 the US National Academies of Science not only endorsed the IPCC's conclusions but produced a new report entitled Abrupt Climate Change: Inevitable surprises, which argued that global warming may trigger «large, abrupt and unwelcome regional or global climatic events» such as severe droughts and floods.

A high - profile report released a week ahead of the summit argues that ambitious climate action could be undertaken at essentially no cost to the global economy.

Goklany uses data from assessment reports, many of them authored by IPCC members, to argue that the world's population would be better off if scientists and policymakers focused on technological advances to help developing countries and tried to mitigate the effects of global warming while keeping the global economy strong.

So the two Science report authors argue that a sudden shift in ocean salinity that corresponded with the slowdown of global warming could have triggered the movement of the heat to much deeper waters.

In one annual report, it declared:»... [T] here has been a close to universal impulse in the [fossil fuel] trade association community in Washington to concede the scientific premise of global warming... while arguing over policy prescriptions that would be the least disruptive to our economy... We have disagreed, and do disagree, with this strategy.»

In order to keep temperatures within this range, the IPCCâ $ ™ s Fourth Assessment Report argues that global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions must start declining by 2015.2 For industrialized countries, which are responsible for most of the GHGs already in the atmosphere, this implies implementing drastic cuts immediately; the latest IPCC Report suggests that compared to 1990 levels, industrialized countries might have to reduce their emissions by 25 to 40 per cent by 2020 and 80 to 95 per cent by 2050.3 Thus, there is little time left to avoid the worst impacts of climate changeâ $» ambitious action is required now.

And before anyone starts to argue that we have left out the direct (i.e., local) effect of global warming — that warmer air holds more moisture and thus it can rain more frequently and harder — McCabe and Wolock report very few long - term trends that would be indicative of steadily rising moisture levels.

Rhetorically, unable to rebut the statistics @ 13, he wishes both to distract from the 1910 - 1945 period, to dismiss the relevance of statistics in favour of popular reports and ancedotes (hence the dismissive comment about the «numbers guy»), and (apparently) to assert that the period from 1945 to 1974 consituted not just a pause, as he has previously argued, but an actual decline in global mean surface temperature.

the report argues that up to 86 % of agriculture's potential for climate change mitigation lies in carbon sequestration in soils; that organic farming results in 20 % -28 % higher levels of soil carbon compared to non-organic farming; and that a global conversion to organic farming could sequester up to 11 % of global greenhouse gas emissions.

Reports in recent years that marine protected areas (MPAs) aren't effective in saving coral reefs from the damaging effects of global climate change have led some to argue that such expensive interventions are futile.

For example, a new report from the Global Warming Policy Foundation, which is headed by Lord (Nigel) Lawson, argues that the eco-hazards «are much smaller than in competing industries».