However, careful selection of tide gauge sites such that records reflecting major tectonic activity are rejected, and averaging over all selected gauges, results in a small uncertainty for
global sea level estimates (Appendix 5.
Not exact matches
And even though these coastal glaciers have passed the point of no return, the researchers predict it's unlikely they'll melt entirely until 2100 — when that happens it's
estimated that it will raise
global sea levels by around 3.8 cm (1.5 inches).
He is the principal investigator for a mission called Oceans Melting Greenland (affectionately known as OMG), a five - year effort to assess the extent to which warmer oceans are melting Greenland's glaciers, and how this information can be used to better
estimate global sea level rise.
A recent study (pdf)
estimated that at the current rate of
global warming, Manhattan will face a
sea level rise of 2 feet or more by 2080.
In comparison,
global sea levels are rising by about 3 millimetres a year, and a recent study
estimated that one - third of that comes from ice loss in Antarctica and Greenland.
Greenland is more than twice as large as Texas and if the entire ice sheet melted, scientists
estimate global sea levels would rise roughly 24 feet.
New research shows projected changes in the winds circling the Antarctic may accelerate
global sea level rise significantly more than previously
estimated.
Recent
estimates suggest the West Antarctic Ice Sheet alone could contribute 3.3 metres to long - term
global sea level rise.
During this period, we
estimate that the Eurasian Ice Sheet contributed around 2.5 metres to
global sea level rise» states Patton.
The finding, which will likely boost
estimates of expected
global sea level rise in the future, appears in the March 16 issue of the journal Nature Climate Change.
«The tide gauge measurements are essential for determining the uncertainty in the GMSL (
global mean
sea level) acceleration
estimate,» said co-author Gary Mitchum, USF College of Marine Science.
,
global transportation infrastructure, the effects of
sea level rise on
sea level toxic waste dumps (there are many) and the posited future of the further industrialization of China and India, which is to be largely (80 % by some
estimates) to be coal powered.
From that number, they have calculated Greenland's contribution to
sea level rise over that time, which they
estimate to be about 10 to 17 percent of the total
global sea level rise of about 1 foot since 1900.
Some studies have attempted to
estimate the statistical relationship between temperature and
global sea level seen in the period for which tide gauge records exist (the last 2 - 3 centuries) and then, using geological reconstructions of past temperature changes, extrapolate backward («hindcast») past
sea -
level changes.
The IPCC's overall
estimate of
global sea level rise, which includes all the other factors that affect
sea levels, such as melt from Greenland's ice sheets and the oceans expanding as they warm, is 60 cm by 2100 (with a likely range of 42 to 80 cm).
A new study combines the latest observations with an ice sheet model to
estimate that melting ice on the Antarctic ice sheet is likely to add 10 cm to
global sea levels by 2100, but it could be as much as 30 cm.
Because there is so much water contained within the ice, as the ice melts, researchers
estimate it could cause an alarming
sea level rise affecting hundreds of millions of people along
global coastlines.
The
global increase in ocean heat content during the period 1993 to 2003 in two ocean models constrained by assimilating altimetric
sea level and other observations (Carton et al., 2005; Köhl et al., 2006) is considerably larger than these observational
estimates.
For a future of continued growth in emissions the new results indicate a likely
global average
sea -
level rise between 1.1 and 2.1 meters (3.6 to 6.9 feet)-- roughly double the IPCC - consistent
estimate.
One recent modeling study focused on this mode of instability
estimated that the Antarctic ice sheet has a 1 - in - 20 chance of contributing about 30 centimeters (1.0 feet) to
global average
sea -
level rise over the course of this century and 72 centimeters (2.4 feet) by the end of the next century.
It is tough to get a firm indication of total
global alpine glacier volumes, but assuming that the
global total is 100 times that in Europe (a wildly high
estimate), if they were all to melt that would imply a
global sea level rise of less than one inch.
In the paper these factors are
estimated and it is concluded that the North Carolina curve should be within about 10 cm of
global mean
sea level.
From Karina (2014 Ocean Sciences p 547): «Our findings show that the area around the Tropical Asian Archipelago (TAA) is important to closing the
global sea level budget on interannual to decadal timescales, pointing out that the steric
estimate from Argo is biased low, as the current mapping methods are insufficient to recover the steric signal in the TAA region.»
The recent
estimate was that
global sea levels will rise by 2 feet.
The same holds for the specific
global mean EIV temperature reconstruction used in the present study as shown in the graph below (interestingly, eliminating the proxies in question actually makes the reconstruction overall slightly cooler prior to AD 1000, which — as noted in the article — would actually bring the semi-empirical
sea level estimate into closer agreement with the
sea level reconstruction prior to AD 1000).
The
sea -
level estimates are consistent with those from delta18O curves and numerical ice sheet models, and imply a significant sensitivity of the WAIS and the coastal margins of the EAIS to orbital oscillations in insolation during the Mid-Pliocene period of relative
global warmth.
I've read, in the mainstream media, about various local efforts to plan for
sea level rise but these articles only mention the
global sea level rise
estimates.
«Alaskan and immediately adjacent Canadian glaciers supply one of the largest measured glaciological contributions to
global sea level rise (~ 0.14 mm yr - 1, equivalent to new
estimates from Greenland).
For example, if this contribution were to grow linearly with
global average temperature change, the upper ranges of
sea level rise for SRES scenarios shown in Table SPM - 3 would increase by 0.1 m to 0.2 m. Larger values can not be excluded, but understanding of these effects is too limited to assess their likelihood or provide a best
estimate or an upper bound for
sea level rise.
If all of the currently available carbon resources —
estimated to be around 10,000 gigatons — were burned, the Antarctic Ice Sheet would melt entirely and trigger a
global sea -
level rise of more than 50 meters, a new long - term modeling study suggests.
The results of the analysis demonstrate that relative to the reference case, projected atmospheric CO2 concentrations are
estimated by 2100 to be reduced by 3.29 to 3.68 part per million by volume (ppmv),
global mean temperature is
estimated to be reduced by 0.0076 to 0.0184 °C, and
sea -
level rise is projected to be reduced by approximately 0.074 — 0.166 cm, based on a range of climate sensitivities.
If all of the currently attainable carbon resources [
estimated to be between 8500 and 13.600 GtC (4)-RSB- were burned, the Antarctic Ice Sheet would lose most of its mass, raising
global sea level by more than 50 m. For the 125 GtC as well as the 500, 800, 2500, and 5000 GtC scenarios, the ice - covered area is depicted in white (ice - free bedrock in brown).
Arbetter, 4.7, Statistical A statistical model using regional observations of
sea ice area and
global NCEP air temperature,
sea level pressure, and freezing degree day
estimates continues the trend of projecting below - average summer
sea ice conditions for the Arctic.
«The
global mean
sea level for the period January 1900 to December 2006 is
estimated to rise at a rate of 1.56 ± 0.25 mm / yr which is reasonably consistent with earlier
estimates, but we do not find significant acceleration»
As we will discuss in this section, this makes it extremely difficult to reliably
estimate what
global, absolute
sea level changes have been.
Global sea level trend
estimates from the merged satellite datasets.
DIVA is a
global model to
estimate impacts of
sea level rise on all coastal nations as well as the costs and benefits of possible adaptation measures.
Syvitski et al. assumed that the last component had been reliably determined by the IPCC, and so for their study they used the IPCC's
estimate of a
global sea level rise of +1.8 to +3.0 mm / yr.
Several other satellite altimeters have also been launched, and the data from these have been used to
estimate global mean
sea level trends since 1993.
In our research group the «semi-empirical method» was developed to
estimate future
sea level rise following from a specified
global warming scenario.
Our analysis combines published relationships between cumulative carbon emissions and warming, together with two possible versions of the relationship between warming and
sea level, to
estimate global and regional
sea -
level commitments from different emissions totals.
Global sea level trend
estimates from the four satellite datasets.
So, they didn't actually simulate
sea level changes, but instead
estimated how much
sea level rise they would expect from man - made
global warming, and then used computer model predictions of temperature changes, to predict that
sea levels will have risen by 0.8 - 2 metres by 2100.
However, with improving techniques, researchers recently
estimated total submarine groundwater (saline and fresh water combined) discharges suggesting a rate 3 to 4 times greater than the observed
global river runoff, or a volume equivalent to 331 mm / year (13 inches) of
sea level rise.
However, as we have seen throughout this section, the tidal gauge
estimates the IPCC used to
estimate global sea level trends are contaminated by local trends, such as tectonic activity, post-glacial rebound... and the coastal subsidence that Syvitski et al. identified!
In the next section, we will discuss why the first factor can seriously bias
estimates of
global sea level trends.
Yet inexplicably, most researchers
estimate global sea level never dropped significantly.
In order to use tidal gauges to reliably
estimate global sea level changes, researchers have to successfully separate the components of shifting land heights and local
sea level variability from any
global trends.
If the entire West Antarctic Ice Sheet were to disintegrate,
estimates suggest it could raise
global sea levels by 3.3 to 6 meters.
The
estimated volume of 25 - year - old or younger groundwater suggests
global groundwater is currently recharging at a rate that would reduce
sea level by 21 mm / year (0.8 inches / year).