Sentences with phrase «global sensitivity»

But the regional effects can potentially contribute to a much lower global sensitivity than people would expect if they intuitively assumed that sensitivity (with «feedbacks») can't be negative.

Such mechanisms probably only produce regional negative net «sensitivities», and while they could add up to a negative global sensitivity, they almost certainly don't (IMO).

Note, however, that their maximum global sensitivity of 2.9 ºC lies well within the accepted range.

By calculating such global sensitivities for a high number of rotational axes, an axis of rotation resulting in the maximum summed sensitivity of all six canals can be determined (Sensitivitymax).

These results, vital for in - depth fuel and engine design work, are detailed in the paper «Numerical Investigation of a Gasoline - Like Fuel in a Heavy - Duty Compression Ignition Engine Using Global Sensitivity Analysis» to be published in an upcoming print edition of the SAE International Journal of Fuels and Lubricants.

For the Late Pleistocene ice ages, estimates of tropical sensitivity are approximately 3 - 4C for a doubling of pCO2, which we suggest represents a minimum value for global sensitivity during the last ~ 500,000 years.

Topics discussed in the workshop covered Bayesian inference, Markov Chain Monte Carlo, emulation, and global sensitivity analyses, etc..

The responses of all six individual semicircular canals to rotation along X can be determined with R and V for each canal, and the orientation of X. Therefore, for a head rotation along any head - centered axis X, the sensitivities of all six canals can be summed to provide a global sensitivity to the rotation (S, in spikes · sec − 1 / degrees · sec − 1).

The Mg / Ca estimates of tropical ocean cooling would be nearly impossible to reconcile with a global sensitivity of 2.3 degrees.

So, small (a degree or so) variations in the global mean don't impact the global sensitivity in either toy models, single GCMs or the multi-model ensemble.

AFAIK the most accurate that I know of are those in your post: — RRB - It seems to me that people have concentrated on calcualting the global sensitivity, but have ignored the local effects, which are the ones we will have to live with.

If the Antarctic Refrigeration Effect can account for the changes in global temperatures, it suggests the global sensitivity to varying levels of CO2 is relatively insignificant.

We calculate the surface forcing by soil dust aerosols and its global sensitivity by varying aspects of the dust distribution that are poorly constrained by observations.

Now, a team of researchers at the Paul Scherrer Institut in Switzerland, with colleagues at Leiden University (Netherlands) and PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency have used Monte Carlo and global sensitivity analysis to... Read more →