HadCRUT released their latest global temperature dataset today, which confirmed what both NOAA and NASA reported earlier this month - that
global temps declined during July 2012.
Not a scientist, but everything I read does not show
global temps declining.
Not exact matches
Bob; I'm glad you linked to McIntyre's discussion of the «Bucket» case; this has always intriqued me because the AGW crew have been furious with the 40's dip in
temp as it contradicts the effect of the linear increase in CO2 and its monotonic connotations for
temp; to overcome the mid-century
decline the
global dimming hilarity was espoused; the Bucket case added a further dimension of hilarity to this because if the
temps actually hadn't dropped as per the Bucket case then
global dimming was rubbish; such is the illogic of the orthodoxy.
Meteorologist Joe Bastardi on
declining global temps: «Has the admin, the EPA or anyone that can read a chart actually looked at what
global temps are now doing?»
Writing «I've just completed Mike's Nature trick of adding in the real
temps to each series for the last 20 years... to hide the
decline» makes Phil Jones of the University of East Anglia, who typed that in 1999, look as if he is pulling a fast one to conceal a trend toward
global cooling.
Latimer, the accurate Plateau - forecast you can find in the (German) Amazon.de: ISBN 978 -3-86805-604-4, which shows that
global temps continue for 3 - 4 decades as Plateau and will
decline thereafter.
Climate Depot Analysis: «There have been at least seven separate explanations for the standstill in
global warming» — 1) Low Solar Activity; 2) Oceans Ate Warming; 3) Chinese Coal Use; 4) Montreal Protocol; 5) Readjusted past
temps to claim «pause» never existed 6) Volcanoes 7)
Decline in Water Vapor
The Himalaya controversy followed another
tempest — the disclosure of e-mails that suggested that leading
global warming scientists in the U.K. and the U.S. had conspired to hide a
decline in
global temperatures.