Not exact matches
Population growth,
urbanization and consumption
trends call for
global resource management.
Jonathan has led numerous research efforts on
global economic
trends, including growth and productivity,
urbanization, affordable housing, energy and sustainability, e-commerce, and the economic impact of the Internet, as well as on productivity growth and economic development in China and Asia.
There's a large
global trend in
urbanization, and there are also large increases in inflammatory disorders.
If a substantial fraction of all the weather stations from around the world have been affected by
urbanization bias, then this could have introduced an artificial warming
trend into the «
global temperature
trend» estimates.
As a result, their «
urbanization bias - corrected»
global temperature
trend estimates was pretty much the same as the estimates of the other groups who didn't apply any
urbanization bias corrections (you can see this by looking back at Figure 1, at the start of the essay).
In a nutshell, we found that
urbanization bias has seriously affected the various
global temperature
trend estimates.
One of the groups using weather records to calculate
global temperature
trends has developed a computer program which they believe has removed the
urbanization biases from their data.
AndThenTheresPhysics, I think John is referring to the claim in Jones et al., 1990 that the contribution of
urbanization bias to
global temperature
trends is less than 0.05 °C / century.
Indeed, a portion of that small linear
trend difference might be due to human CO2 emissions; or, then again, it might be due to the vast
urbanization effect over the last 60 + years; or due to the large deforestation that's taken place; or, maybe it's entirely due to the serial fabrication of
global warming by the world's climate agencies; or it's even possible that the post-1950 warming was entirely a natural phenomenon - the same as the prior 64 - year period experience.
This dramatic revision of the estimated impact of
urbanization on temperatures in China does not change the
global picture of temperature
trends.
Another paper in Climate Change in 2007 stated: Studies that have looked at hemispheric and
global scales conclude that any urban - related
trend is an order of magnitude smaller than decadal and longer time - scale
trends evident in the series (e.g., Jones et al., 1990; Peterson et al., 1999)... Thus, the
global land warming
trend discussed is very unlikely to be influenced significantly by increasing
urbanization (Parker, 2006).
Still, prior to the satellite - based measurements they were the best proxy for
global temperature and if used just to measure
trends they could have been a very good proxy if: · Measurements were taken from the same set of
global positions each year · Adjustments for creeping
urbanization, equipment upgrades and equipment movements were made honestly
Watts contends that if the
global data were properly adjusted for
urbanization and station siting, and land use change issues were addressed, what would emerge is a cyclical pattern of rises and falls with much less of any background
trend.
Especially since 2002 is the warmest (at least globally with the GHCN - ERSST data) I prefer to look at 1880 -LRB--.2) to 2006 (+.3) off
global mean for the period and it's clear to see the
trend globally going from -.4 to +.3 The only questions then left are what is the meaning (and / or import) of the sudden changes since 1980, what changing a total of.005 C a year during the period means, what impact does increasing
urbanization globally and additional industrialization in places like India and China contribute, why the drop from +.6 to +.3, and why not a constant increase from year to year, given the elevated CO2 levels.
The traditional hierarchy of
global cities is breaking down, according to experts, as technology, globalization and
urbanization trends have started to attract real estate investment on a broader scale...