Sentences with phrase «global view of science»
Through international collaborations, the Center promotes a global view of science and technology concerns for students and faculty.
http://www.csne-erc.org/ Not exact matches
Because Troeltsch, at the beginning of this century, was keenly aware of many trends that became apparent to most observers only at its end: the collapse of Eurocentrism; the perceived relativity of all historical events and knowledge (including scientific knowledge); an awareness that Christianity is relative to its Western, largely European history and environment; the emergence of a profound global pluralism; the central role of practice in theology; the growing impact of the social sciences on our view of the world and of ourselves; and dramatic changes in the role of religious institutions and religious thought.
In my view, there are at least six key factors which have caused and continue to affect a global transformation of consciousness: the revolution in communications, globalization of the economy, a growing awareness of the degradation of the environment, demographic shifts, the threat of nuclear destruction and the advent of the new science.
In your view, why have American students fallen behind over the last three decades, and what role should the federal government play to better prepare students of all ages for the science and technology - driven global economy?
MELBOURNE, AUSTRALIA — In the run - up to national elections on 21 August, the country's top science body, the Australian Academy of Science (AAS), has weighed in on the climate change debate with a report backing the mainstream scientific view that human - induced climate change is real and that a business - as - usual approach to carbon emissions will lead to a «catastrophic» four - to five - degree increase in average global temperscience body, the Australian Academy of Science (AAS), has weighed in on the climate change debate with a report backing the mainstream scientific view that human - induced climate change is real and that a business - as - usual approach to carbon emissions will lead to a «catastrophic» four - to five - degree increase in average global temperScience (AAS), has weighed in on the climate change debate with a report backing the mainstream scientific view that human - induced climate change is real and that a business - as - usual approach to carbon emissions will lead to a «catastrophic» four - to five - degree increase in average global temperatures.
Three years ago, for example, Texas revised its science teaching standards to require that students «analyse and evaluate different views on the existence of global warming».
When science posits a truth that seems to contradict Scripture (lack of evidence of a global flood, for example), the Bible's inherent elasticity simply envelops the new finding, and any apparent contradiction is relegated to the realm of parable (where Noah's ark resides, in the view of many Catholics).
Diving deeper into the complex puzzle of mass strandings, the team decided to expand their analysis and include additional oceanographic and atmospheric data sets from NASA's Earth science missions, including Terra, the Sea - viewing Wide Field - of - view Sensor — or SeaWIFS, for short — and Global Precipitation Measurement, as well as the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite, or GOES, mission.
Early views of the martian surface from the Mars Orbiter Camera of Mars Global Surveyor M. C. Malin, M. H. Carr, G. E. Danielson, M. E. Davies, W. K. Hartmann, A. P. Ingersoll, P. B. James, H. Masursky, A. S. McEwen, L. A. Soderblom, P. Thomas, J. Veverka, M. A. Caplinger, M. A. Ravine, T. A. Soulanille, and J. L. Warren Science 279, 1681 — 1685, doi: 10.1126 / science.279.5357.1681, 13 MarcScience 279, 1681 — 1685, doi: 10.1126 / science.279.5357.1681, 13 Marcscience.279.5357.1681, 13 March 1998.
The 2 °C target was reaffirmed in the 2009 «Copenhagen Accord» emerging from the 15th Conference of the Parties of the Framework Convention [11], with specific language «We agree that deep cuts in global emissions are required according to science, as documented in the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report with a view to reduce global emissions so as to hold the increase in global temperature below 2 degrees Celsius...».
The journal aims to provide a platform for the global research community to share their findings, insights and views about all aspects of health science.
Griethuijsen, R., Eijck, M.W. van; Brok, Haste, H., P.J., Mansour, N. Boujaoude, S & Savran, A. Global patterns in students» views of science and Interest in science, International J. Science Education (under review),science and Interest in science, International J. Science Education (under review),science, International J. Science Education (under review),Science Education (under review), (2015)
Achievement Preparatory Academy PCS — Elementary * 202-562-1307 Achievement Preparatory Academy PCS — Middle * 202-562-1214 Aiton Elementary School 202-671-6060 Amidon - Bowen Elementary School 202-724-4867 Anacostia High School 202-698-2155 AppleTree Early Learning PCS — Columbia Heights 202-667-9490 AppleTree Early Learning PCS — Douglas Knoll (Southeast) * 202-629-2545 AppleTree Early Learning PCS — Lincoln Park 202-621-6581 AppleTree Early Learning PCS — Oklahoma Ave 202-629-2179 AppleTree Early Learning PCS — Parklands (Southeast) * 202-506-1890 AppleTree Early Learning PCS — Southwest 202-646-0500 Ballou High School 202-645-3400 Bancroft Elementary School 202-673-7280 Barnard Elementary School 202-576-1100 BASIS DC PCS 202-393-5437 Beers Elementary School 202-939-4800 Benjamin Banneker High School 202-671-6320 Breakthrough Montessori PCS * 202-407-7021 Brent Elementary School * 202-698-3363 Bridges PCS 202-545-0515 Brightwood Education Campus 202-722-5670 Brookland Middle School * 202-759-1999 Browne Education Campus * 202-671-6210 Bruce - Monroe Elementary School @ Park View 202-576-6222 Bunker Hill Elementary School 202-576-6095 Burroughs Elementary School * 202-576-6150 Burrville Elementary School * 202-671-6020 Capital City PCS — Lower School * 202-808-9800 Capital City PCS — Middle School * 202-808-9800 Capital City PCS — High School * 202-808-9800 Capitol Hill Montessori @ Logan 202-698-4467 Cardozo Education Campus 202-673-7385 Cedar Tree Academy PCS * 202-610-4193 Center City PCS — Brightwood 202-723-3322 Center City PCS — Capitol Hill 202-547-7556 Center City PCS — Congress Heights 202-562-7070 Center City PCS — Petworth 202-726-9212 Center City PCS — Shaw 202-234-1093 Center City PCS — Trinidad 202-397-1614 Cesar Chavez PCS for Public Policy — Capitol Hill * 202-547-3424 Cesar Chavez PCS for Public Policy — Chavez Prep * Abierto el 21 de abril de 10AM - 1PM 202-723-3975 Cesar Chavez PCS for Public Policy — Parkside High School * Abierto el 21 de abril de 10AM - 2PM 202-398-2230 City Arts and Prep PCS * 202-269-4646 Cleveland Elementary School * 202-939-4380 Columbia Heights Education Campus 6 - 8 (CHEC) * 202-939-7700 Columbia Heights Education Campus 9 - 12 (CHEC) * 202-939-7700 Coolidge High School 202-671-6080 Creative Minds International PCS * Abierto el 21 de abril de 9AM - 1PM 202-588-0370 C.W. Harris Elementary School * 202-645-3188 DC Bilingual PCS 202-750-6674 DC Prep PCS — Anacostia Elementary * 202-729-3500 DC Prep PCS — Benning Elementary * 202-398-2838 DC Prep PCS — Benning Middle * 202-396-3780 DC Prep PCS — Edgewood Elementary * 202-635-4411 DC Prep PCS — Edgewood Middle * 202-832-5700 DC Scholars PCS * Abierto el 21 de abril de 10AM - 1PM 202-559-6138 Deal Middle School 202-939-2010 Democracy Prep Congress Heights PCS * 202-561-0860 Digital Pioneers Academy PCS * Abierto el 21 de abril de 10:30 AM - 1:30 PM en el gimnasio de la escuela Stanton Elementary (2701 Naylor Rd SE) 202-677-3522 District of Columbia International School * 202-808-9033 Dorothy I. Height Elementary School * 202-723-4100 Drew Elementary School * 202-671-6040 Duke Ellington School of the Arts 202-282-0123 Dunbar High School 202-698-3762 Eagle Academy PCS — Capitol Riverfront * 202-459-6825 Eagle Academy PCS — Congress Heights * 202-544-2646 Early Childhood Academy PCS * 202-373-0035 Eastern High School * 202-698-4500 Eaton Elementary School 202-282-0103 E.L. Haynes PCS - Elementary School 202-667-4446 E.L. Haynes PCS - Middle School * Abierto el 21 de abril de 9AM - 5PM para cualquier familia de E.L. Haynes, nueva o regresando, independientemente del plantel que van a asistir en el otoño 202-667-4446 E.L. Haynes PCS - High School 202-667-4446 Eliot - Hine Middle School * 202-939-5380 Elsie Whitlow Stokes Community Freedom PCS — Brookland 202-265-7237 Elsie Whitlow Stokes Community Freedom PCS — East End * Abierto el 21 de abril de 11AM - 2PM 202-265-7237 Excel Academy * 202-373-0097 Friendship Online PCS * 202-729-8287 Friendship PCS — Armstrong Elementary * 202-518-3928 Friendship PCS — Blow - Pierce Elementary * 202-572-1070 Friendship PCS — Blow - Pierce Middle * 202-572-1070 Friendship PCS — Chamberlain Elementary * 202-547-5800 Friendship PCS — Chamberlain Middle * 202-547-5800 Friendship PCS — Collegiate Academy * 202-396-5500 Friendship PCS — Southeast Elementary Academy * Abierto el 21 de abril de 9AM - 1PM 202-562-1980 Friendship PCS — Technology Preparatory Middle Academy * 202-552-5700 Friendship PCS — Technology Preparatory High School Academy * 202-552-5700 Friendship PCS — Woodridge Elementary 202-635-6500 Friendship PCS — Woodridge Middle 202-635-6500 Garfield Elementary School 202-671-6140 Garrison Elementary School * 202-673-7263 Hardy Middle School * 202-729-4350 Harmony DC PCS - School of Excellence * 202-529-7500 Hart Middle School 202-671-6426 H.D. Cooke Elementary School 202-939-5390 Hearst Elementary School * 202-282-0106 Hendley Elementary School 202-645-3450 Hope Community PCS — Lamond 202-722-4421 Hope Community PCS — Tolson 202-832-7370 Houston Elementary School * 202-671-6170 Howard University Middle School of Mathematics and Science PCS * 202-806-7725 Hyde - Addison Elementary School 202-282-0170 IDEA PCS * 202-399-4750 Ideal Academy PCS 202-729-6660 Ingenuity Prep PCS * 202-562-0391 Inspired Teaching Demonstration PCS * 202-248-6825 Janney Elementary School 202-282-0110 Jefferson Middle School Academy 202-729-3270 Johnson Middle School 202-939-3140 J.O. Wilson Elementary School 202-698-4733 Kelly Miller Middle School * 202-388-6870 Ketcham Elementary School * 202-698-1122 Key Elementary School 202-729-3280 Kimball Elementary School * 202-671-6260 King Elementary School 202-939-4900 Kingsman Academy PCS 202-547-1028 KIPP DC — AIM Academy PCS 202-678-5477 KIPP DC — Arts and Technology Academy PCS 202-398-6811 KIPP DC — College Preparatory PCS 202-678-2527 KIPP DC — Connect Academy PCS * Abierto el 21 de abril de 9AM - 12PM para cualquier familia de KIPP DC, nueva o regresando, independientemente del plantel que van a asistir en el otoño 202-396-5477 KIPP DC — Discover Academy PCS 202-678-7735 KIPP DC — Grow Academy PCS * Abierto el 21 de abril de 9AM - 12PM para cualquier familia de KIPP DC, nueva o regresando, independientemente del plantel que van a asistir en el otoño 202-986-4769 KIPP DC — Heights Academy PCS 202-610-5323 KIPP DC — KEY Academy PCS 202-582-5477 KIPP DC — LEAD Academy PCS * Abierto el 21 de abril de 9AM - 12PM para cualquier familia de KIPP DC, nueva o regresando, independientemente del plantel que van a asistir en el otoño 202-223-4505 KIPP DC — LEAP Academy PCS 202-582-5327 KIPP DC — Northeast Academy PCS * Abierto el 21 de abril de 9AM - 12PM para cualquier familia de KIPP DC, nueva o regresando, independientemente del plantel que van a asistir en el otoño 202-398-5477 KIPP DC — Promise Academy PCS 202-582-1390 KIPP DC — Quest Academy PCS 202-398-6811 KIPP DC — Spring Academy PCS * Abierto el 21 de abril de 9AM - 12PM para cualquier familia de KIPP DC, nueva o regresando, independientemente del plantel que van a asistir en el otoño 202-397-5477 KIPP DC — Valor Academy PCS 202-398-6811 KIPP DC — WILL Academy PCS * Abierto el 21 de abril de 9AM - 12PM para cualquier familia de KIPP DC, nueva o regresando, independientemente del plantel que van a asistir en el otoño 202-328-9455 Kramer Middle School * 202-939-3150 Lafayette Elementary School * 202-282-0116 Langdon Elementary School 202-576-6048 Langley Elementary School * 202-724-4223 LaSalle - Backus Education Campus * 202-671-6340 Leckie Elementary School 202-645-3330 Lee Montessori PCS * Abierto el 21 de abril de 10AM - 1PM 202-779-9740 Ludlow - Taylor Elementary School 202-698-3244 MacFarland Middle School * 202-576-6130 Malcolm X Elementary School @ Green * 202-645-3409 Mann Elementary School 202-282-0126 Marie Reed Elementary School * 202-673-7308 Maury Elementary School * 202-698-3838 McKinley Middle School * 202-281-3950 McKinley Technology High School * 202-281-3950 Meridian Public Charter School — Elementary School * 202-387-9830 Meridian Public Charter School — Middle School * 202-793-2667 Miner Elementary School * 202-397-3960 Moten Elementary School 202-698-1111 Mundo Verde Bilingual PCS * 202-750-7060 Murch Elementary School 202-282-0130 Nalle Elementary School * 202-671-6280 National Collegiate Preparatory Public Charter High School * 202-832-7737 North Star College Preparatory Academy for Boys PCS * 202-505-9072 Noyes Elementary School 202-281-2580 Orr Elementary School 202-671-6240 Oyster - Adams Bilingual School 202-671-6130 Patterson Elementary School 202-939-5280 Paul PCS — Middle School 202-291-7499 Paul PCS — International High School 202-291-7499 Payne Elementary School * 202-698-3262 Peabody Elementary School 202-698-3277 Perry Street Prep PCS 202-529-4400 Phelps Architecture, Construction, and Engineering High School * 202-729-4360 Plummer Elementary School 202-939-4360 Powell Elementary School * 202-671-6270 Randle Highlands Elementary School * 202-729-3250 Raymond Education Campus 202-576-6236 Richard Wright PCS for Journalism and Media Arts * 202-388-1011 Rocketship DC PCS — Ward 5 * Procesando la inscripción para las familias asignadas a este plantel el 21 de abril de 12PM - 2PM en Smith Public Trust (3514 12th St NE) 202-627-2256 Rocketship Legacy Prep PCS * Abierto el 21 de abril de 10AM - 12PM 202-627-2256 Rocketship Rise Academy PCS 202-750-7177 Ron Brown College Preparatory High School 202-729-4343 Roosevelt High School 202-576-6130 Roots PCS 202-882-8073 Ross Elementary School 202-673-7200 Savoy Elementary School * 202-939-2000 School - Within - School @ Goding * 202-727-7377 School Without Walls @ Francis - Stevens 202-724-4841 School Without Walls High School 202-645-9690 Seaton Elementary School 202-673-7215 SEED Public Charter School of Washington, DC * Abierto el 21 de abril de 9AM - 11:30 AM 202-248-3025 Sela PCS * Abierto el 21 de abril de 10AM - 12PM 202-670-7352 Shepherd Elementary School * 202-576-6140 Shining Stars Montessori Academy PCS * 202-723-1467 Simon Elementary School 202-645-3360 Smothers Elementary School * 202-939-3600 Somerset Preparatory Academy PCS * Abierto el 21 de abril de 9AM - 3PM 202-562-9170 Sousa Middle School * 202-729-3260 Stanton Elementary School 202-671-6180 Stoddert Elementary School 202-671-6030 Stuart - Hobson Middle School 202-671-6010 Takoma Education Campus * 202-671-6050 The Children's Guild Public Charter School * 202-774-5442 Thomas Elementary School 202-724-4593 Thomson Elementary School * 202-898-4660 Thurgood Marshall Academy PCS * 202-563-6862 Truesdell Education Campus * 202-576-6202 Tubman Elementary School 202-673-7285 Turner Elementary School 202-645-3470 Two Rivers PCS at 4th Street 202-546-4477 Two Rivers PCS at Young * Abierto el 21 de abril de 9AM - 3PM para cualquier familia de Two Rivers, nueva o regresando, independientemente del plantel que van a asistir en el otoño 202-388-1360 Tyler Elementary School 202-939-4810 Van Ness Elementary School * 202-727-4314 Walker - Jones Education Campus 202-939-5934 Washington Global Public Charter School * 202-796-2415 Washington Latin PCS — Middle School * 202-223-1111 Washington Latin PCS — Upper School * 202-223-1111 Washington Leadership Academy PCS * 240-580-3371 Washington Mathematics Science Technology PCHS 202-636-8011 Washington Yu Ying PCS * 202-635-1950 Watkins Elementary School 202-698-3355 West Education Campus * 202-576-6226 Wheatley Education Campus * Abierto el 21 de abril de 9AM - 1:30 PM 202-939-5970 Whittier Education Campus 202-576-6156 Wilson High School 202-282-0120 Woodson High School * 202-939-2030
The journal aims to provide a platform for the global research community to share their findings, insights and views about all aspects of health science.
Dr. Habibullo Abdussamatov — head of the space research laboratory of the Russian Academy of Science's Pulkovo Observatory and of the International Space Station's Astrometria project says «the common view that man's industrial activity is a deciding factor in global warming has emerged from a misinterpretation of cause and effect relations.»
«The Global Restructuring of Science as a Marketplace of Ideas» Trust in Science workshop CBC Conference Centre, Toronto, Ontario 2007 in over a decade only 3,608 views, as usual, becuase it is too hard to comprehend and verify the already known evidence piece by piece, and besides that, it's too hard for «scientists» to swallow, basically it is NOT in their Field.
Science: What is your view of the scientific evidence that attributes global warming to human activity?
Despite a long string of years in which Republican leaders and candidates bashed global warming science, the platform adopted on July 18 has no section characterizing — one way or the other — the party's view of risks from an unabated buildup of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.
* The role of the US in global efforts to address pollutants that are broadly dispersed across national borders, such as greenhouse gasses, persistent organic pollutants, ozone, etc...; * How they view a president's ability to influence national science policy in a way that will persist beyond their term (s), as would be necessary for example to address global climate change or enhancement of science education nationwide; * Their perspective on the relative roles that scientific knowledge, ethics, economics, and faith should play in resolving debates over embryonic stem cell research, evolution education, human population growth, etc... * What specific steps they would take to prevent the introduction of political or economic bias in the dissemination and use of scientific knowledge; * (and many more...)
They're implying that settling on a global warming policy (or the lack of it) is somehow special, somehow a matter of science and economics and politics that stands apart from one's world view or ethics or religious beliefs.
I first dug in on behavioral and social science research related to global warming views and responses in 2006, and it quickly became clear that this was the scariest body of science of all — topping ice - sheet instability and even calling into question the utility of my profession.
The highlighted points of emphasis in the report have been the dominant focus of research in the field of science communication and science studies for the past 15 years and the basis for recent innovative projects such as the World Wide Views on Global Warming initiative.
If Mann had wanted to point to an opposite end to the spectrum of ways in which scientists can contribute to public discourse on global warming science and risks, a better choice (in my view) would have been Susan Solomon's handling of the rollout of the 2007 science report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
In the talk, Victor, trained in political science, warns against focusing too much on trying to defeat those denying the widespread view that greenhouse - driven climate change is a clear and present danger, first explaining that there are many kind of people engaged at that end of the global warming debate — including camps he calls «shills» (the professional policy delayers), «skeptics» (think Freeman Dyson) and «hobbyists.»
But, as is so clear in considering the interface of science and society on a host of tough issues — from nanotechnology and synthetic biology to global warming — the views of the average person, let alone an elderly folkie, do matter.
a cadre of scientists who share the industry's views of climate science and to train them in public relations so they can help convince journalists, politicians and the public that the risk of global warming is too uncertain to justify controls on greenhouse gases, â??
But the newly obtained documents show that Dr. Carlin's highly skeptical views on global warming, which have been known for more than a decade within the small unit where he works, have been repeatedly challenged by scientists inside and outside the E.P.A.; that he holds a doctorate in economics, not in atmospheric science or climatology; that he has never been assigned to work on climate change; and that his comments on the endangerment finding were a product of rushed and at times shoddy scholarship, as he acknowledged Thursday in an interview.
One group had to defend Susan Solomon, the much lauded atmospheric scientist who, while a co-leader of the 2007 science assessment by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, staunchly refused to provide her personal view of the implications of global warming research despite the prodding of reporters.
As I've written before, whatever your view of the science and policy choices related to global warming, you can probably find a Nobelist with matching views.
For years, skeptics have filled comments with dismissive views of climate science to sow doubts about the consensus that fossil fuels are responsible for global warming — dominating that space, according to the group.
And the new Yale / George Mason poll, which is the first I have seen to prove the views of Tea Partiers, shows that Tea Party members (12 % of the public) feel they are very well informed about climate science and more than half think global warming will never hurt anyone.
Click on the image above to read a «post card» from the Svalbard Global Seed Vault articulating the views of Nina Fedoroff, the science adviser to the secretary of state.
Three themes are emerging from the newly released emails: (1) prominent scientists central to the global warming debate are taking measures to conceal rather than disseminate underlying data and discussions; (2) these scientists view global warming as a political «cause» rather than a balanced scientific inquiry and (3) many of these scientists frankly admit to each other that much of the science is weak and dependent on deliberate manipulation of facts and data.
But he later contacted Guardian Australia to say that he accepts the science of global warming which in his view does not present any consensus that human beings contribute to global warming.
But ultimately, the pope's views on climate science will do little to alter the opinions of Catholics about global warming.
These incorrect views of convectively induced global warming originated with the National Academy of Science (NAS) report of 1979.
* We have developed a distinct set of principles that set us apart from most other stakeholders in the climate debates: * The GWPF does not have an official or shared view about the science of global warming — although we are of course aware that this issue is not yet settled.
Some people, well - known for disputing the mainstream consensus on climate science, are asking the judge to admit their views in a friend of the court brief, asserting that «there is no agreement among climatologists as to the relative contributions of Man and Nature to the global warming» of the past several decades.
Heartland's position on climate change is controversial only in the mainstream media (which has decided to treat global warming the way liberal environmental groups tell them to, as a matter of settled science) and in the view of far - left organizations such as «Forecast the Facts.»
«The most important conclusion, in my view, was that EPA needed to look at the science behind global warming and not depend upon reports issued by the United Nations, which is what they were thinking of doing and in fact have done,»
In 2004, as they correctly point out, Harvard science historian Naomi Oreskes published an essay in Science magazine in which she examined the abstracts of 928 articles on the subject of «global climate change» published in scientific journals between 1993 and 2003, and «found that 75 % supported the view that human activities are responsible for most of the observed warming over the previous 50 years while none directly dissented.science historian Naomi Oreskes published an essay in Science magazine in which she examined the abstracts of 928 articles on the subject of «global climate change» published in scientific journals between 1993 and 2003, and «found that 75 % supported the view that human activities are responsible for most of the observed warming over the previous 50 years while none directly dissented.Science magazine in which she examined the abstracts of 928 articles on the subject of «global climate change» published in scientific journals between 1993 and 2003, and «found that 75 % supported the view that human activities are responsible for most of the observed warming over the previous 50 years while none directly dissented.»
The most one could say is that these sorts of groups have opposed specific legislation, such as carbon taxes or drilling bans, that Brulle wants politicians to enact into law.50 This opposition may explain a lot about Brulle's motivations, and it definitely shows that he's more interested in political victories than science, but it says nothing about how Americans form their views of the science of Global Warming.
Science offers its view on global warming based on available data, the Pope expresses his view in moral terms, and Senator Inhofe, for example, argues on behalf of industry and ideology.
For instance, the Reason Foundation ($ 7.2 million) is on Brulle's list, despite the fact that its top writer on science issues shares some of environmentalists» views on Global Warming / Climate Change.
Bate countered environmentalists» global warming assertions with a skeptical view of the science [2].
For instance, US Senator James Imhofe of Kansas called climate change «the greatest hoax ever» (Johnson, 2011) To claim that climate change science is the greatest hoax ever is at minimum, if not a lie, reckless disregard for the truth given the number of prestigious scientific organizations that have publicly supported the consensus view, the undeniable science supporting the conclusion that if greenhouse gases increase in the atmosphere some warming should be expected, the clear link between rising greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere and increases in fossil fuel use around the world, as well undeniable increases in warming being that have been experienced at the global scale.
You didn't like the exclusion of Spencer's essay «How serious is the global warming threat» at the same time complaining that they did not exclude papers on «Social science, education, research about people's views on climate».
Initially, PED showed backbone, standing up to political activists pushing the state to adopt the Next Generation Science Standards view of climate change, which promotes the false claims that the science on climate change is settled, that we know human activities are driving dangerous climate change, that carbon dioxide is a pollutant that's dangerous to human health and the environment, and that we fully understand how to counteract the effects of climate change or control long - term global tempeScience Standards view of climate change, which promotes the false claims that the science on climate change is settled, that we know human activities are driving dangerous climate change, that carbon dioxide is a pollutant that's dangerous to human health and the environment, and that we fully understand how to counteract the effects of climate change or control long - term global tempescience on climate change is settled, that we know human activities are driving dangerous climate change, that carbon dioxide is a pollutant that's dangerous to human health and the environment, and that we fully understand how to counteract the effects of climate change or control long - term global temperature.
In my view it was problematic from day one that CEQ officials, whose essential job was to advance the President's policy and political position on global climate change, were at the table participating directly in the governance of the Climate Change Science Program and shaping its communication of climate change research.
Even if you disagree with the views of the researchers we discussed in this essay who are critical of man - made global warming theory, we hope you agree that they are reputable scientists and that their criticisms are science - based.