RussiaGate — Even when
global warming alarmists base claims on scientific measurements, they've often had their finger on the scale.
Not exact matches
... The
global warming alarmists could not pursist without their endless use of fear, scare and dire predictions; most of which are
based on faulty computer programs.
According to climate
alarmists, the frequency and severity of this natural hazard should already be increasing in response to model -
based predictions of CO2 - induced
global warming.
The NY Times and Al Gore will not like this, but it is better to fight it out on the
basis of the
alarmists» invalid science rather than the moral wisdom of their alleged attempt to «save the world» from imaginary
global warming / climate change due to human - caused CO2 emissions.
And so, over the decade,
alarmist climate scientists tried to fool the public by stonewalling («it's the
warmest decade on record,» which doesn't mean the decade was
warming), denying the facts («the allegation that annual
global mean temperatures stopped increasing during the past decade has no
basis in reality»), or outright lying («the world is
warming even more quickly than we had thought»).
Again proving that
alarmist science is
based on scientific untruths, speculation and hype, two new studies confirm what objective scientists have actually observed: recent past
global warming is not causing an increase on severe storms.
Based on their track record of consistent falsehood and failure, the
global warming alarmists have no credibility.
Recently, two science articles
based on the latest research belies the notion, held by
global warming alarmist proponents, that climate change is only a result of modern human CO2 emissions.
Then thereâ $ ™ s the pesky issue of â $ œconsensus.â $
Alarmists typically counter any fact -
based global warming argument with the assertion that the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has already ruled on the issue, and therefore â $ œthe science is settledâ $ and â $ œthe debate is over.â $ â $ œMild winter temperatures will decrease heavy snowstorms, â $ IPCC claimed in its 2001 Third Assessment.
Who among hot climatists will want to commit to writing a desire to collaborate in figuring out a way to discredit the more accurate satellite data that shows no
global warming going on 2 decades in preference to greater reliance on the use of massaged land -
based temperature records that support the
global warming alarmists» meme that free enterprise capitalism is destroying the Earth?