Sentences with phrase «global warming alarmists say»

«Many global warming alarmists say that vast stretches of coastline are going to be swallowed up by the sea.

Not exact matches

Dr. Richard Lindzen — Professor of Meteorology at M.I.T., member, the National Research Council Board on Atmospheric Sciences and Climate, says global warming alarmists «are trumpeting catastrophes that couldn't happen even if the models were right.»

«Your efforts have gone a long way to stop the global warming alarmist agenda,» he said.

Here is what I actually said: ``... the climate alarmists maintain that Africa is already experiencing natural disasters — principally floods, droughts, malaria and other diseases, arising from unnatural global warming, and that these are causing increases in poverty, malnutrition, disease and environmental damage.

Nope that is not what the global warming alarmists are saying.

That essentially is what Dr. Tim Ball was saying when he took heat for comparing the tactics of global warming alarmists to those of Nadolf Nitler.

The bad news is that as more is understood about global warming, and as we compare what has happened to what was predicted by the average models (from the actual science, not from popular sensationalized media), the earlier scientific predictions have turned out to be too conservative, not as you say «too alarmist».

If you're not a global warming geek, the point of the material is that we have apparent — and I only say apparent at this point — written admissions of cooking the books, among other nastiness, by the leading names in the global warming alarmist movement.

«I've seen Al Gore's film twice, but I've also read Michael Crichton's State of Fear, which makes a compelling case on the other side,» says Hug, referring to the controversial 2004 novel in which Crichton — using scientific arguments that were hotly challenged by critics — ridiculed the global - warming consensus as the work of conspiratorial alarmists.

«We should be growing more trees and using more wood,» says Moore, but the global warming alarmists refer to the forests as «carbon stocks» that must not be used.

««Alarmist» Global Warming Claims Unfounded Says Climatolgist,» CNSNews.com, July 14, 2003.

«Alarmists» are wrong when they say that the» pause in global warming» has ended — the recent warming was just due to an El Nino» vs. «There has been a pause in warming since 1998.»

And I assume the Sierra Club would issue a public retraction if confronted with the facts that the data are precisely as I described that over the last 18 years there has been no significant warming and indeed that is why global warming alarmists invented the term «the pause» to explain what they called the pause in global warming because the data demonstrate what you just said, that the Earth is cooking and warming, is not back up by the data.

50 - 50 in this context would be that alarmists now are willing to say — e.g.,... it's even money we're wrong to believe all global warming since 1950 is mostly caused by human activity.

Governments, political parties, AGW alarmists, «green» industries, celebrities, mainstream media news outlets, TV networks like NBC, special interest groups — all of these close - knit groups have both personal and professional vested interests in keeping the myth of «man - made» global warming alive, and suffice it to say that they will work hard to «contain» this scandal.

Around the capital, there was a flurry of debates, Senate speeches, inflammatory editorials and talk - show commentaries, some contending that global warming was an alarmist fantasy and others saying action was essential.

As more and more scientists defect from the crumbling alarmist bandwagon, however, critics say the hysterical shrieking and dangerous rhetoric from politicians only serve to further illustrate the accelerating collapse of what many climate experts refer to as the «global - warming hoax.»

After becoming fed up with the childish and dangerous tactics of alarmists, particularly the use of the term «climate denier,» Spencer said that the «global - warming Nazis» were in fact threatening millions of lives — especially among the poor — with their «pseudo-scientific ramblings» and support for fascist - style «radical policies» supposedly aimed at combating «global warming.»

Instead of publicly expressing their views, a group of parliamentarians said skeptics should parrot the imploding official narrative: The notion that global warming, which even leading alarmists admit has been on «pause» for 17 years in defiance of every UN climate model, is caused by human activities and requires planetary carbon taxes and more government control.