This is also why
global warming alarmists try to do their best to quench anything related to the the solar variability → cosmic ray flux → atmospheric ionization → low altitude cloud cover link which by now has ample evidence for support, both empirical and experimental.
Is this a greenhouse gas bait and switch, or are
the global warming alarmists trying to up the ante.»
The real story is finding the trend that
global warming alarmists tried to hide.
Not exact matches
Global warming alarmists are now
trying to prepare a «soft exit» for themselves.
That pretty much is how skeptics feel when
trying to have an intelligent conversation with
global warming alarmist — especially when they can not even admit Mann's hockey stick is political and more social than science.
And so, over the decade,
alarmist climate scientists
tried to fool the public by stonewalling («it's the
warmest decade on record,» which doesn't mean the decade was
warming), denying the facts («the allegation that annual
global mean temperatures stopped increasing during the past decade has no basis in reality»), or outright lying («the world is
warming even more quickly than we had thought»).
Rather, the
alarmists are still
trying to convince an increasingly skeptical public that human production of carbon dioxide will soon lead to runaway
global warming and climate catastrophe.
Why can't the
global warming alarmists lead us by example instead of simply
trying to pick our pockets?
Ever since the 2011 CLOUD experiment at the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN),
alarmists have
tried to denigrate the results, claiming it's a myth that cosmic rays can affect
global warming.
Barely has the year begun and already the climate
alarmist propaganda machine is up to its old tricks,
trying to scare you with made up science stories promising
global warming - related doom and gloom...