Sentences with phrase «global warming believer»

I'm not a global warming believer.

Particularly amusing for me last year was how I landed at another global warming believer's blog (I forget how, most likely from daily Google email alert I get on stories about global warming that I created in 2008), and after a series of comment placements which started with one of the strangest sidesteps * I'd ever seen, the blogger declared in a new blog post that I must be «the Gestapo of the Heartland Institute with the job of hunting down dissenting opinions and persecuting those responsible» (full text here).

Since I've been labeled an «investigative journalist», I'll briefly dispute it, and then describe how no less than Democrat New York Senator and global warming believer Chuck Schumer says people like me are journalists.

-------------------------------------------------------------------- Next up: Green Corps, part 3: Why can't we get a straight story on which organization flipped Senator John McCain into being a global warming believer?

Global warming believer - turned - skeptic Anthony Watts, a former TV meteorologist, posted a new report online questioning the reliability of weather stations in the U.S. Historical Climatology Network, a 120 - year - old weather system that forms one tent pole of climate measurements.

You need to take the carbon quiz to learn a few basics especially if you are a global warming believer because all science necessarily requires informed skepticism to counterbalance anything that starts becoming theoretical consensus which happens to be a political term not a scientific one.

My correspondent is a fervent anthropogenic global warming believer, so he fully expects this outcome.

Gleick is about the only strong global warming believer mentioned by the fake strategy document.

Beck's group is small compared to Al Gore's global warming believers and the «Barack My World» group during the last USA presidential election.

But I have no doubt Global Warming believers, the corporations and NGO's that profit off them, and the politicians that cater to them would be exclaiming the planet is going to die if these problems were caused by record heat and not record cold.

One of the reasons I am skeptical of many of the Global Warming believers is the strange tendency to latch on to any event and cry SEE, Global Warming!

«Global warming believers are like a hysterical «cult»: MIT scientist compares «climate alarmists» to religious fanatics,» Daily Mail Online, January 22, 2015.

As I've said on several occasions here and elsewhere, the major problem with global warming believers» enslavement to the «reposition global warming as theory rather than fact» phrase is that it is not in any way proof of an arrangement between between skeptics and industry officials involving payments made for false climate assessments.

Instead what far more obvious is that almost all Global Warmer believers are dead stupid about physics.

Those who eager to accept authority will be selected to be global warming believers.

A timeline of where, how and when that «reposition global warming» phrase first showed up is something global warming believers would hate, since it might prompt a total loss of faith in the validity of that central accusation point.

Global warming believers need only to counter dry recitations of skeptic science material with assertions about the numbers of «IPCC scientists», declare this to be the settled consensus opinion, then claim there is leaked memo evidence proving skeptics are paid industry money to «reposition global warming as theory rather than fact» — hoodwink the public, in other words.

Weather between the poles has also conspired to make the global warming believers look bad.

But when increasing numbers of the public become aware of how NY state AG Schneiderman and Al Gore handed their heads on a silver platter two weeks ago to investigators, journalists, and wavering global warming believers, the more likely this entire witch hunt collapses.

Similar to other talking points from the Al Gore side of the issue (e.g. the «tobacco industry parallel,» and the «inconsistent statements» notion), the bit about influential climate deniers having «a big megaphone» is a single - serving talking point, meant to be swallowed without question by the general public and regurgitated instantly by global warming believers when the need arises.

No, Pope's target isn't the anthropogenic global warming believers.

Ray: I thought so too until I started engaging global warming believers.

I concluded my comment pointing out how global warming believers» misinformation tactic only undermines their cause.

Full of liberal progressives (aka socialists) global warming believers.

Don't worry all you global warming believers.

No need to worry all you global warming believers.

By Andrew Bolt Global warming believers told us this year to look at the Arctic — and heed the awesome lesson.

Why Warmists Hate Debate: Flashback 2007: Scientific Smackdown: Skeptics Voted The Clear Winners Against Global Warming Believers in Heated NYC Debate — NASA & RealClimate.org's Gavin Schmidt appeared so demoralized that he mused that debates equally split between believers of a climate «crisis» and scientific skeptics are probably not «worthwhile» to ever agree to again

Flashback 2007: Scientific Smackdown: Skeptics Voted The Clear Winners Against Global Warming Believers in Heated NYC Debate — NASA's Gavin Schmidt appeared so demoralized that he mused that debates equally split between believers of a climate «crisis» and scientific skeptics are probably not «worthwhile» to ever agree to again - Schmidt on his teams debate loss: «We were pretty dull.»

Of the global warming believers, the majority also reported thinking that the burning of fossil fuels and other human activities play a role.

Plus, some amount of my time goes toward dropping into hard - core global warming believers» sites, ultimately to live rent - free in those bloggers (plural, I should note) / commenters» minds.

Global warming believers across the board trust that the «industry - corrupted skeptic climate scientists» accusation has evidence to back it up, trusting in the notion that their leaders speak with authority about it being exposed by a «Pulitzer Prize - winning investigative journalist.»

It makes you wonder just how small the global warming believers are.

It is noticeable how many of those now calling for Dr Pachauri's resignation, led by Professor Andrew Weaver, a senior IPCC insider, are passionate global warming believers....

All his exercise did was reinforce the appearance of global warming believers being enslaved to the tactic of «delete, delete, delete... and kill the messenger.»

Not exact matches

Stopping overpopulation is one way the dangers of climate change can be mitigated, according to two of the most prominent believers in global warming.

Quite simply, you're no skeptic, but a believer in catastrophic anthropogenic global warming.

I am not a global warming denyer, nor am I a true believer, and I have usually found that the truth lies somewhere in between.

By inventing the therm» pause» you guys are delaying the inevitable:» global» warming doesn't exist / H2O is regulating the climate, not CO2!The truth exist; truth is much more important than million believers: https://globalwarmingdenier.wordpress.com/2014/07/12/cooling-earth/

After following the global warming saga — science and policy — for nearly a quarter century, I've seen the biases at the journals and N.S.F. (including their press releases sometimes), in the I.P.C.C. summary process (the deep reports are mainly sloppy in some cases; the summary writing — read the climate - extinction section of this post — is where the spin lies), and sometimes in the statements and work of individual researchers (both skeptics and «believers»).

People who are strong believers in global warming and in protecting the environment need to lead by example.

Died - in - the - wool believers in global warming will argue that coal will produce CO2 and contribute to global warming but the following two points will undermine their arguments without challenging the AGW hypothesis.

They keep yapping about «thousands of scientists» contributing to the IPCC AR4, when in fact the Summary for Policymakers was written by a small coterie of believers in a strong effect of CO2 on global warming.

As an avowed believer in global warming why are you pointing out the ice?

An atmospheric scientist and evangelical Christian, Hayhoe is a firm believer in manmade climate change and recently addressed a UN-sponsored climate change conference in Edmonton, Alberta, on the woes that await the human race if global warming is not curbed.

Harris cites the work of PhD - level climate scientists and atmospheric physicists who've studied global warming for decades, and none of these skeptics deny climate science in any general sense of the word — that's another unsupportable talking point from believers of catastrophic man - caused global warming.

I bet a climate - change true believer about 5 years ago that within 10 years the wheels would be coming off the global warming bus.

When you say «believers,» are you thinking of all people who believe global warming is a serious threat, or are you intentionally trying to refer to a specific segment of that group?

I am no longer a «believer» in human caused global warming, there is simply no evidece for more than a small fraction of one degree C per century — and without that and the fertilisation effect of the increased CO2 that we are enjoying, the human race would starve.

KR - I briefly looked at Spencer Weart and despite being a believer in global warming comes out against a recent argument for the consensus here.