Sentences with phrase «global warming deniers seems»

Not exact matches

Denying global warming is one prime example held by extremists who seem to lean toward the religious right with respect to political ideology.

Points 2 and 3 might lead to their not believing in global warming, but when faced by such an overwhelming majority of scientist who believe it, it seems (to me) almost like a conspiracy theory to deny it.

If you listen to global warming deniers, or even much of the public, it seems like there is some stack of scientific studies somewhere that refute anthropogenic — human - caused — climate change.

Although some correspondents seemed eager to jump to the exact global warming — denying conclusions Keppler and Röckmann had cautioned against, others expressed a more thoughtful attitude as to how this discovery might affect our understanding of global climate change.

I had thought there was a legitimate scientific debate about the role of global warming and hurricanes, but it appears that the deniers, although they are legitimate scientists, seem to have fallen in with the think tank ideologues and PR lobbyists who masquerade as scientists.

Seeing that Theda Skocpol has also invoked this term «denier» in her recent and much - discussed white paper [link] from Harvard's symposium on «The Politics of America's Fight against Global Warming,» it seems this label won't be fading anytime soon.

-LSB-...] everyone that the best - selling author who has become a hero to Deniers — even bringing his trash talk against U.S. climate scientists to a Senate hearing — doesn't seem to know the first thing about global warming -LSB-...]

Since this blog has given considerable space to the discussions of the global warming deniers (who have no real basis in serious academic literature), it would only seem fair to review this book by Speth in the NY Times, and then have a discussion of it on this blog.

The global warming denier blogs, where this issue first came up, seem to think that I was being critical of the I.P.C.C. report in the same way as seen from their perspective, and, as a result, I have received e-mails from the denier crowd hailing my remarks and commending me for «speaking up» on this important topic.

A feature of [the global warming] controversy is that those that deny there is a problem often seem to have political or ideological views that lead them to be unhappy with the actions that would be necessary should global warming be due to human activity.

«deny there is a problem often seem to have political or ideological views that lead them to be unhappy with the actions that would be necessary should global warming be due to human activity»

People who insist that human beings cause global warming seem to be denying basic facts (see Christopher Monckton, Global Warming is Really Global Cooling,global warming seem to be denying basic facts (see Christopher Monckton, Global Warming is Really Global Coolingwarming seem to be denying basic facts (see Christopher Monckton, Global Warming is Really Global Cooling,Global Warming is Really Global CoolingWarming is Really Global Cooling,Global Cooling, 2009,

Their work seems, consistently, to be representative of their Global Warming denier board member Don Blankenship rather than members like Nike, who have issued strong statements about climate change.

«Deniers» get ridiculed but the most vicious comments seem to be reserved for those who technically agree with the global warming hypothesis but are not in lock step with the most extreme forecasts.

Worst idea: 2009 seems to have been the year that global warming deniers shifted from claiming that climate disruption is a hoax to claiming that climate disruption is too big and too far along to stop, so there's no point in doing anything about it.

seems to me that the only group more «religious» than global warming supporters are the global warming deniers.

A feature of this controversy is that those that deny there is a problem often seem to have political or ideological views that lead them to be unhappy with the actions that would be necessary should global warming be due to human activity.

So this isn't about «denying global warming» as the mindless mind - reading WHT seems to think.

A feature of this controversy is that those who deny that there is a problem often seem to have political or ideological views that lead them to be unhappy with the actions that would be necessary if global warming were due to human activity.

What global warming deniers can't seem to get through their thick skulls is that four major climate research centers exist, including Hadley.

Many of the skeptics / deniers seem very passionate about global warming — regularly commenting on blogs, news websites, writing to members of the Liberal party etc..