The anthropogenic
global warming hypothesis says ocean heat should increase fairly steadily and uninterrupted (monotonic), barring any volcanic eruptions
The anthropogenic
global warming hypothesis says ocean heat should increase fairly steadily and uninterrupted (monotonic), barring any volcanic eruptions
Not exact matches
«This would be consistent with the elite cues
hypothesis, in that we would expect political leaders who deny anthropogenic
global warming to claim victory during unseasonably cold periods or amplify their denial during unseasonably
warm periods that invite challenge to their worldview,»
says Bohr.
So if there are fewer GCRs reaching Earth (because a strong solar magnetic field is deflecting them away), the
hypothesis says there will be fewer clouds, more sunlight reaching the Earth's surface, and thus more
global warming.
Dr. Zbigniew Jaworowski — world - renowned expert on the ancient ice cores used in climate research —
says the U.N. «based its
global -
warming hypothesis on arbitrary assumptions and these assumptions, it is now clear, are false.»
In the main text of the paper he
says «Given that
global warming is «unequivocal», and is «very likely» due to human activities to quote the 2007 IPCC report, the null
hypothesis should now be reversed, thereby placing the burden of proof on showing that there is no human influence.»
Years ago Richard Lindzen
said consensus was reached about the Anthropogenic
Global Warming (AGW)
hypothesis before the research began.
The abstract of his paper
says: «Given that
global warming is unequivocal, the null
hypothesis should be that all weather events are affected by
global warming...» — nothing about human influence.
In his abstract he
says «Given that
global warming is unequivocal, the null
hypothesis should be that all weather events are affected by
global warming...» This may not be true but it makes certain amount of sense.
Trenberth
said the null
hypothesis should be switched to assuming
global warming is real.
That winter, John Holdren, President Obama's top science adviser, appeared in a video to
say «the kind of extreme cold being experienced by much of the United States as we speak, is a pattern that we can expect to see with increasing frequency as
global warming continues» — essentially endorsing Francis and Vavrus's
hypothesis.
I.e. to
say, in other words: Null
hypothesis is proven, the globing
warming issue is settled: «The end of
global warming» (Book title) has been reached.....
The 94 year - old scientist, famous for his Gaia
hypothesis that Earth is a self - regulating, single organism, also
said that he had been too certain about the rate of
global warming in his past book, that «it's just as silly to be a [climate] denier as it is to be a believer» and that fracking and nuclear power should power the UK, not renewable sources such as windfarms.
Obviously, the AGW True Belivers have thrown in the intellectual towel when Trenberth
says the null
hypothesis of
global warming should now be reversed, thereby placing the burden on humanity to prove that it is not influencing climate.
So if there are fewer GCRs reaching Earth (because a strong solar magnetic field is deflecting them away), the
hypothesis says there will be fewer clouds, more sunlight reaching the Earth's surface, and thus more
global warming.
««We're not sure GE's management performed the necessary due diligence before embracing the
global warming hypothesis,»
said Milloy.