It was an October 2012 public TV program that simply could not expand out of the 3 - point mantra that the man - caused
global warming issue always boils down to: «the science is settled» / «skeptics are industry - corrupted» / «reporters may ignore skeptic material because of points 1 & 2».
Not exact matches
Global Warming On the issue of global warming, I am always on the lookout for simple explanations from the scientific community that can be used to communicate to hoi polloi why global warming is occurring primarily because of human activity (especially emissi
Global Warming On the issue of global warming, I am always on the lookout for simple explanations from the scientific community that can be used to communicate to hoi polloi why global warming is occurring primarily because of human activity (especially emiss
Warming On the
issue of
global warming, I am always on the lookout for simple explanations from the scientific community that can be used to communicate to hoi polloi why global warming is occurring primarily because of human activity (especially emissi
global warming, I am always on the lookout for simple explanations from the scientific community that can be used to communicate to hoi polloi why global warming is occurring primarily because of human activity (especially emiss
warming, I am
always on the lookout for simple explanations from the scientific community that can be used to communicate to hoi polloi why
global warming is occurring primarily because of human activity (especially emissi
global warming is occurring primarily because of human activity (especially emiss
warming is occurring primarily because of human activity (especially emissions...
I have
always seen the whole
global warming debate as a series of
issues, including, at the least: 1) Is the planet
warming?
Until then, count me among the skeptics who consider this a political rather than scientific
issue, especially in light of the fact that it is believed that the Antarctic and arctic shelves are breaking from stress (from «overgrowth»), not due to heat, since they are larger than they have been during recorded history, and that when the alarmists are proven conclusively to be wrong, they change the terminology («
global cooling» to «
global warming» to «
global climate change» - face it, the
global climate
always has been and
always will be very dynamic).
Skeptics of Western
global warming are really aware of obvious mistakes that fall within their particular areas of expertise and most skeptics take
issue with the picture of impending calamity that
global warming fearmongers
always try to paint.
I totally agree Jennifer; when the
issue theme was «
Global Warming» sceptics said NO, the climate is
always changing.
All these years Steve has maintained a very clear (and
always polite) stance: he proposed himself to audit some data, models, procedures and conclusions, while not defending or declaring any particular position about the claims made by Climate Science regarding anthropogenic climate change,
global warming and other similar
issues.