Sentences with phrase «global warming law»

Since the passage of its landmark global warming law in 2006, California has been reducing carbon emissions from cars, trucks, homes and factories, while boosting production of renewable energy.

Their new organization, Californians for Clean Energy and Jobs, will push for greater investment in green technology and the enforcement of the global warming law, known as A.B. 32, according to Mr. Steyer, founder of Farallon Capital Management in San Francisco.

California's global warming law, AB32, calls for utilities to increase their use of renewable energy to at least 30 percent by 2020, and some say they may not make it.

But California's landmark global warming law, passed in 2006, requires the state's greenhouse gas emissions to be slashed to 1990 levels by 2020, amounting to a 30 % cut over expected levels.

The program is a centerpiece of California's landmark global warming law, AB32, which orders a nearly 30 percent reduction in greenhouse gases over the next decade.

Frankly, California doesn't need a global warming law as it puts California on the downside of being competitive.

The landmark global warming law, which is being enforced in phases, could put the state's businesses at a competitive disadvantage unless other states and the federal government come up with similar plans, the study by the nonpartisan agency said.

The global warming law requires California to cut its greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by 2020.

George P. Shultz, the Republican former secretary of state, and Thomas F. Steyer, the Democratic hedge fund billionaire, are reviving the coalition that campaigned last year to defeat Proposition 23, the California ballot measure that would have derailed the state's» landmark global warming law.

The fight over Proposition 23, the California ballot initiative that would suspend the state's landmark global warming law, has spawned some unusual political alliances.

Proposition 23 would have effectively derailed the state's landmark global warming law, which would have been a big setback for California's blooming green technology industry.

An appeal to afflicted communities: an image circulated by foes of the repeal of a state global warming law.

At the start of the campaign for California's Proposition 23, the ballot measure that would suspend the state's global warming law, opponents darkly warned that the Texas oil companies backing the initiative would spend as much as $ 50 million to win the election.

With the failure of federal climate change legislation, considerable national attention is focused on Proposition 23, which marks the first time a global warming law has been put before voters.

Editor's Comments: Will this happen in California due to AB32, California's Global Warming Law?

Environmentalists are using the information that scientists find to argue that the science shows that global warming laws should be passed.

And since many of them have been used to justify global warming laws and and regulations these laws and regulations have been passed under false premises.

Not exact matches

Who today, with global warming and all that, could say that free beings can not seriously damage or alter nature without altering its laws.

Atheist believe in nothing but they still exist, Most Atheist believe in Global Warming, Our EPA regulations, laws are higher than any other country, just implement's the laws on the books and we will be fine.

Now economists are applying this law of demand to policies intended to improve energy efficiency and reduce greenhouse gas emissions linked to global warming.

Likewise, conservatives with higher news media literacy were less likely to believe five conspiracy theories commonly associated with conservatives — among them that Barack Obama was not born in the U.S., that global warming is a hoax, and that the 2010 health care law authorized government panels to make end - of - life decisions for people on Medicare.

In 2006 California passed a law — the Global Warming Solutions Act (Assembly Bill 32)-- that pledged the state to reduce its greenhouse gas emission levels back to 1990 levels by 2020.

The bill's text, if passed into state law, would protect teachers from discipline if they «help students understand, analyze, critique, and review in an objective manner the scientific strengths and scientific weaknesses of existing scientific theories covered in the course being taught,» namely, «biological evolution, the chemical origins of life, global warming, and human cloning.»

If science can nail climate change as a probable cause of deadly weather events, like the heatwave that hit Europe in the summer of 2003, then global warming becomes a matter for product liability law.

One of the world's most ambitious laws to combat global warming survived a challenge on Tuesday as California voters overwhelmingly rejected a measure that would have put the state's plans for more renewable energy and a market to curb greenhouse gases on ice.

After the failure of federal climate legislation in Congress this year, the fate of California's law was viewed as a US turning point — either away from addressing global warming or toward stronger action to curb greenhouse gases.

Everything you need to know about the legal effort to block the new law to restrain global warming pollution from power plants

The basic fact that rising concentrations of greenhouse gases result in global warming has been understood since it was predicted from physical laws over a century ago; specification of the magnitude and geographical distribution of the warming are elucidated by the twentieth century observations and calculations.

«It's pretty convincing stuff: observations and the physical law of energy conversation have been used to show greenhouse gases are responsible for global warming and that alternative scenarios violate this law of nature.

CLIMATE LAW INSTITUTE Protect species and habitats from global warming by reducing greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution.

About Blog Blog about Global warming, climate change law by Columbia Law Scholaw by Columbia Law SchoLaw School.

The typology includes logical problems, algorithmic problems, story problems (which have underlying algorithms with a story wrapper that amounts to an algorithmic problem), rule - using problems, decision - making problems (e.g., cost - benefit analysis), troubleshooting (systematically diagnosing a fault and eliminating a problem space), diagnosis - solution problems (characteristic of medical school and involving small groups understanding the problem, researching different possible causes, generating hypotheses, performing diagnostic tests, and monitoring a treatment to restore a goal state), strategic performance, case analysis (characteristic of law or business school and involving adapting tactics to support an overall strategy and reflecting on authentic situations), design problems, and dilemmas (such as global warming, which are complex and involve competing values and which may have no obvious solutions).

The typology includes: logical problems, algorithmic problems, story problems (which are algorithmic problems with a story wrapper), «rule - using» problems, decision - making problems (e.g., cost - benefit analysis), troubleshooting (systematically diagnosing a fault, eliminating a problem space), «diagnosis - solution» problems (characteristic of medical school, which involve small groups understanding the problem, researching different possible causes, generating hypotheses, performing diagnostic tests, and monitoring a treatment to restore a goal state), strategic - performance, case analysis (characteristic of law or business school, which involve adapting tactics to support an overall strategy and reflecting on authentic situations), design problems, and dilemmas (such as global warming, which are complex and involve competing values, and which may have no solutions).

This is because the laws of the universe state it to be impossible but I believe that there could be an alternative working model that, in turn, could combat such things as global warming.

Last week, after I sent some of the clips and blogs about cold weather and global warming to Cass Sunstein, the University of Chicago law professor who has written much about «availability entrepreneurs» who try to shift public attitudes using dramatic events, he wrote back:

I am still waiting for you to explain why the stratosphere has been cooling (it should be warming if the sun / natural causes are the cause of global warming) without violating the 1st Law of Thermodynamics (look it up and learn).

They don't care to abide by the law anymore than they care about controlling global warming.

Yet AGW advocates claim that the doubling of CO2 levels will invariably, due to iron clad physical laws, result in 2 degrees (or more) of global warming.

317 Dan sez: «I am still waiting for you to explain why the stratosphere has been cooling (it should be warming if the sun / natural causes are the cause of global warming) without violating the 1st Law of Thermodynamics (look it up and learn).

The nutrient available in least supply (Liebig's Law of the Minimum) is much more likely to be water, and since global warming increases drought, agricultural output will suffer.

The bill will prohibit the state equivalent of DEQ from * enforcing * any law that mentions global warming.

The presentation of the physical laws of nature that govern the phenomenon provides a better understanding to those on both sides of the global warming issue.»

How can the ideal gas law predict a trivial change in temperature (due to the change in air density by substituting CO2 for oxygen) when the GCMs predict global warming of 4 to 11 degrees?

Whitman has said she would suspend the global - warming law for one year but has not endorsed the initiative.

Environmental groups have sought to force the federal government to restrict carbon dioxide emissions using the Clean Air Act, the Endangered Species Act (because of threats to polar bears from global warming) and other federal laws, and now they are poised to add the Clean Water Act to the list.

In a forthcoming paper for the Harvard Law and Policy review, «Fast Clean Cheap,» we argue that a regulation - centered approach would only achieve 10 — 30 percent emissions reductions in the U.S. by 2050, whereas we need 80 percent emissions reductions in the U.S. and 50 percent emissions reductions worldwide by then if we are to avoid catastrophic global warming.

How can Wien's law require more energy - out be generated but the only source of energy for global warming (except the solar) is by reducing the energy - out to create an energy imbalance to create the radiative warming.

I have a brother - in - law who is a Fox News / Talk Radio junky and he insists global warming is a myth yet has never read or seen a scientific article.

California headed for a high - stakes battle over global warming Tuesday, as an oil industry - backed measure to suspend the state's aggressive climate - change law qualified for the November ballot.

To prime the conversation, here's a lecture Oppenheimer delivered at Pace Law School last November, titled «When Will Global Warming Become Dangerous?»