Sentences with phrase «global warming models»

The temperature increase is in line with predictions of global warming models.

In global warming models, water vapor plays a key role as both a positive and a negative feedback loop to climate change.

So how does this fit with global warming models?

Global warming models use data from multiple locations over long periods of time.

Global warming models attempt to be as accurate as possible.

Does anyone have an update of the first graph, or any recent data comparison with 10 — 30 year old global warming models?

Since 1970 we have seen exactly what global warming models predict — more rainfall in the North - West and some desert areas and less in the major agricultural regions.

He has used this platform to attack «bogus global warming models,» and argue that our vast oil supply can «make America great again.»

But, it seems in a race to find evidence of the global sea level rises predicted by man - made global warming models, a number of researchers have underestimated how problematic the data is.

It is often argued by AGW supporters that because the historic warming is so close to what the current global warming models say historic temperatures should look like, and because the models are driven by CO2 forcings, then CO2 must be causing the historic temperature increase.

Dr. Antonino Zichichi — one of the world's foremost physicists, former president of the European Physical Society, who discovered nuclear antimatter — calls global warming models «incoherent and invalid.»

However, global warming models also predict increased winds aloft across the subtropical, hurricane - spawning regions.

The Australian newspaper recently reported on three senior Japanese scientists who separately engaged in climate - change research and «have strongly questioned the validity of the manmade global warming model that underpins the drive by the UN and most developed - nation governments to curb greenhouse gas emissions.»

Should we sublect global warming models and modelers to similar scrutiny of methods and motives?

«Pioneering Coral Reef Scientist: Actual Climate Evidence Refutes Global Warming Model Predictions - Climate Not Well Understood Main The Embarrassing Facts: 97 % of Climate Scientists Equals Only 75 Anonymous Persons Who Answered Online Survey»

1) Connection to global warming The model simulates an increase in Northern England precipitation in winter, but the trend is not as large as the observed one.

Dismissing the models as a social construct does her argument no favour and casts doubt on her ability to understand the caveats and uncertainties inherent in global warming models.

Because I advocated for a careful risk analysis of the probabilities associated with global warming models and projections he immediately casts me as someone who has no interest in conservation or alternative energy sources.

Australia exemplifies what global warming models have long predicted, climate experts say, and what is happening in this hardy nation offers a glimpse of some of what is on the horizon for the United States as well.

He has used this platform to attack «bogus global warming models,» and argue that our vast oil supply can «make America great again.»

Some of these researchers had been predicting an acceleration on the basis of their man - made global warming models, e.g., one of the authors of Church & White, 2006 had already been predicting an acceleration in Church et al., 1991 (Open access).

I don't think that global warming models (which all of a sudden you seem so fond of) predict stratospheric warming, do they?

* «Princeton physicist Will Happer's WSJ op - ed: «Global warming models are wrong again»: The former federal official calls climate's «observed response» to more CO2 «not in good agreement with model predictions.»»

And you might recall that his March 27 Wall Street Journal op - ed «Global warming models are wrong again» called the climate's «observed response» to more CO2 «not in good agreement with model predictions.»

Nevertheless I say again that I'd like to see someone of stature in science or someone of high visibility in the national media challenge Professor Happer specifically about the contrast between the very headline on his WSJ op - ed («Global warming models are wrong again») and what's asserted by this RC posting (and by Lazarus @ 31) about the retrospective reliability of Hansen et al. (1981).

StephenL suggests this is consistent with global warming models.

Patrick J. Michaels (± 1942 --RRB-, also known as Pat Michaels, is a largely oil - funded global warming skeptic who argues that global warming models are fatally flawed and, in any event, we should take no action because new technologies will soon replace those that emit greenhouse gases.

The global warming models presented by Hansen (2006) are shown in Figure 1.

The assumptions of the global warming models must be publicly, repeatedly, and systematically critiqued, and when they do not stand up to scrutiny, these assumptions and policies must be rejected by the United States government outright.

Unlike the global warming models of scientists, which were soon disproved by actual measurements, Abdussamatov's models have been affirmed by actual events, including the rise of the oceans and the measurable irradiance sent earthward by the sun.

More than a dozen climate experts, including professors at the most prestigious universities in the world and scientists who worked with the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), also told The New American in recent months that the global warming models were deeply flawed at best.