Sentences with phrase «global warming projections»

But the study found that such adaptations typically occur about 10,000 to 100,000 times too slowly to keep pace with global warming projections for the year 2100.

For example, the criticisms of James Hansen's 1988 global warming projections never go beyond «he was wrong,» when in reality it's important to evaluate what caused the discrepancy between his projections and actual climate changes, and what we can learn from this.

Hansen's paper created global warming projections based on three greenhouse gas emissions scenarios (A, B, and C).

Global warming projections show that by 2100, Earth will be 4 degrees C warmer on average.

From the quotes available it appears she said an increase in heavy precipitation events and persistent storm tracks further south is consistent with global warming projections — not that global warming would cause the jet stream to «get stuck.»

«Our results suggest that it doesn't make sense to dismiss the most - severe global warming projections based on the fact that climate models are imperfect in their simulation of the current climate,» Brown said.

The first and most egregious of these examples occurred in 1998, when Michaels testified before Congress and deleted two of the three global warming projections from Hansen et al. (1988).

Also, I hate to sound like a broken record (as I said this about the «Southern sea ice is increasing» page too), but I don't see why we need both this page and the one called «IPCC global warming projections were wrong,» as they both seem to cover the same topic.

Directionally, all the incentives in academia are to inflate global warming projections.

For example, the criticisms of James Hansen's 1988 global warming projections never go beyond «he was wrong,» when in reality it's important to evaluate what caused the discrepancy between his projections and actual climate changes, and what we can learn from this.

Given the inaccuracy of those predictions after just one decade, we were surprised to learn that Easterbrook had highlighted them in his talk, going as far as to claim that his global cooling projectons have thus far been more accurate than the global warming projections in the 2001 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Third Assessment Report (TAR).

Not one of his assertions stands up to scrutiny, starting with his characterization of Mann's paleoclimatology work as «global warming projections».

Tellingly, Barton calls my research in this area «global warming projections.»

However, in a major about - face on June 20, «Climate change: A cooling consensus,» The Economist takes writers at the New Republic and the Washington Post to task for admitting that the global warming projections predicted by the computer models have failed, while at the same time trying to spin the results in such as way as to maintain the urgency for enacting drastic (and very costly) climate policies.

A new paper in Environmental Research Letters by Rahmstorf, Foster, and Cazenave (RFC12) takes a very interesting approach in testing the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) global warming projections, and also examines its sea level rise projections.

Mr. Barton's reference to «Mr. Mann's global warming projections» is incorrect and quite misleading.

By comparing the global warming projection for the next century to natural climate changes of the distant past, and then looking into the future far beyond the usual scientific and political horizon of the year 2100, Archer reveals the hard truths of the long - term climate forecast.