Sentences with phrase «global warming sceptic»

Her biographical note on the IPA website described her as «a «global warming sceptic»» and goes on to state that she «considers scepticism important for the progress of science.»

Having a link to «how to talk to Global Warming Sceptic» vetted and endorsed by professionals at RealClimate, reflects, to an observer badly on RealClimate..

Furthermore, I vaguely recollect that he does not describe himself as a man - made global warming sceptic.

I'm not a global warming sceptic, but I find this single issue to be the hardest one to answer.

While Stott's describes himself as being a «mildly left - wing global warming sceptic» he dismisses the Kyoto Protocol as unrealistic «command and control» economics.

«I am not a global warming sceptic.

The US Congress's most ardent global warming sceptic is being accused of turning the row over climate science into a McCarthyite witch - hunt by calling for a criminal investigation of scientists.

Add the fact that France's most prominent global warming sceptic is an eminent vulcanologist, who also happens to be a much - hated socialist ex-minister of education, and you can see how attitudes can be affected by trivial considerations of national politics.

It appears that the latest flap regarding hurricane expert and noted global warming sceptic Bill Gray was a bit overblown.

I call it Global Warming Sceptic Bingo!

Shall we play Global Warming Sceptic Bingo to see which excuses the denialist / delusionist fringe posts here?

However, Bellamy has become a prominent global warming sceptic and has made a number of notable claims in the media.

Via a series of foundations, Koch and his brother, David, have also given millions of dollars to global warming sceptics, according to Greenpeace.

In this overheated environment do I detect the hand of global warming sceptics in business and the media at work, gleefully sowing the seeds of confusion?

As usual, a lucid, concise and unarguable (for those who care to listen) debunking of the standard global warming sceptics» arguments.

The global warming sceptics often quoted the less responsible and more sensationalistic journalists.

Reading and listening to global warming sceptics can get a little tedious because they keep trotting out the same discredited arguments.

Dr Iain Stewart investigates the counter attack that was launched by the global warming sceptics in the 1990s.

What is much more important is the fact that global warming sceptics rightly claimed in the 80s that 10 years of warming wasn't long enough to prove that the change was significant.

Iain interviews some of the key global warming sceptics, and discovers how their positions have changed over time.

But their popularity has attracted the attention of global warming sceptics funded by the oil industry, who have started to attack polar bear science.

Though not CMOS's first public statement, it was one of the most «vocal about climate change of late» due to the fact «that Canada's new Conservative government does not support the Kyoto Protocol for lower emissions of greenhouse gases, and opposed stricter emissions for a post-Kyoto agreement at a United Nations meeting in Bonn in May [2006]» and because «a small, previously invisible group of global warming sceptics called the Friends of Science are suddenly receiving attention from the Canadian government and media,» Leahy wrote.

Fair consideration is required of the views of the anthropogenic global warming sceptics.

Mimicking the post-modernists in their critique of the social sciences and humanities, the global warming sceptics have characterised climate science as a social construction of scientists motivated by career advancement and prospects of research funding.

He manages to publish articles by every biased organisation under the sun from global warming sceptics, real science poo pooers, ideological nutcases, one eyed fossil fuel lobbyists, sycophants of large business politicos, and the would be destroyers of public services and regulation.

Global warming sceptics using media campaign to discredit IPCC Lord Lawson's group Global Warming Policy Foundation is attempting to distort media debate on climate change

His proposition that the Global Warming sceptics «cherry - pick» the data to suit their needs is the opposite of the truth.

: Scientists at a leading British climate research centre had a culture of withholding information from global warming sceptics but did not deliberately manipulate data to support their case, politicians said today

As for the global warming sceptics they must live in cloud cuckoo land.

It is (as far as I can tell) named after Theodor Landscheidt, a solar scientist who worked on the relationship between planetary cycles and solar cycles has been basically ignored by the scientific community (he had an H - index of 3 — which is pretty poor) but taken up enthusiastically by global warming sceptics and astrologers.

It does however, confirm my theory, that global warming sceptics are no different to creationists.

Kate Loveys, 28th January 2010, «Climategate» scandal scientists broke the law by hiding data from global warming sceptics http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/climatechange/7088055/University-scientists-in-climategate-row-hid-data.html

«A Greenpeace investigation has identified a little - known, privately owned US oil company as the paymaster of global warming sceptics in the US and Europe.

Not exact matches

Plaintiffs would go after easy targets and companies like Whitehaven Coal — which are already in the sights of climate activists — and other companies that resisted the need to change the way they do business to help slow man - made global warming or funded climate sceptics could be vulnerable.

Climate sceptics have gleefully blogged that the emails, now widely published on the internet, reveal extensive data manipulation and expose a conspiracy behind global warming research.

Professor Frank Chambers, Head of the University of Gloucestershire's Centre for Environmental Change and Quaternary Research, who led the writing of the Fast - Track Research Report, said: «Both sceptics and adherents of Global Warming might draw succour from this work.

In so far as some sceptics and deniers are proclaiming that carbon dioxide - induced anthropogenic global warming may be «the scientific fraud of the century» then surely the issues surrounding it must be the scientific debate of the century.

Climate sceptics are prone to ignore indicators of global warming when it suits them, but their protagonists can be guilty...

Labels: climate change, climate sceptics, endangered species, energy, environment, global warming, North America, oil, whale

Climate sceptics immediately claimed it contains an admission that much of global warming is a result of the sun's variability, not greenhouse gas emissions.

In 2008, climate change sceptic Roger Pielke Sr said this: «Global warming, as diagnosed by upper ocean heat content has not been occurring since 2004».

Michael is also right to point out that the fossil fuel funded sceptics have cleverly kept the argument on whether global warming is happening and on its cause, thus diverting attention away from the dangers.

Some sceptics are even using their press - releases about «2007 likely to be warmest year», «2009 in top 5 warmest years», to claim that global warming is being exaggerated.

The Alaskan Governor's submission on this subject even cited a «letter» (non peer reviewed, not scientific) written by a group of sceptics (willie soon, david legates, sallie baliunas) and part funded by ExxonMobil, which says that global warming isn't happening, therefore the bears are not under threat.

Nigel Calder is a prominent sceptic and made a pugnacious contribution to the Channel 4 «The Great Global Warming Swindle» film, just one year ago.

«Senator, you said something that caught my attention in your remarks, that the person who had become a sceptic, a converted sceptic — you said that he made the statement that global warming was 100 % due to human activity.

Is Paul likely to suggest that all global warming propaganda on school curricula comes with a «balancing» message from climate sceptics?

More importantly, second, it fires a shot across the bows of any liberal organ which dares to entertain a climate sceptic on its pages in much the same way as Martin Durkin's Great Global Warming Swindle (just 90 minutes of TV in a shedule jam - packed with environmentalism) drew furious comments about Channel 4 from the Great and the Good.

Finally, you ask, «Is Paul likely to suggest that all global warming propaganda on school curricula comes with a «balancing» message from climate sceptics?»

Archived (PDF) by «Anthropogentic Global Warming: Documents supporting the sceptics» view (www.au.agwscam.com).