Not exact matches
Environmentalists have long scrutinized Exxon Mobil
for giving money «to dozens of right - leaning interest groups whose main purpose was to cast doubt on that very
science» despite understanding the link between
global warming and the burning of fossil fuels as early as the 1970s, according to the New York Times.
It's a
science - driven company focused on solving problems like world hunger and
global warming with,
for instance, drought - resistance seeds, which have been gaining market share from competitors but had to be developed over years.
You likely deny evolution and
global warming for no other reason than it makes you uncomfortable and hold
science to the impossibly high standard of having to explain every conceivable mystery about the natural World before you will accept it, but some moron at a pulpit doing magic hand signals of a Sundaymorning is enough to convince you he is communicating with some sky - god and turning grocery store bread and wine into flesh and blood.
A child can have good observation skills that allow
for excellent Scientific Method to be applied (Unlike
Global warming science) where experiements are welcome and results shared and results verified by other scientists.
You likely deny
global warming for no other reason than it makes you uncomfortable and hold
science to the impossibly high standard of having to explain every conceivable mystery about the natural World before you will accept it, but some moron rolling around a floor speaking in tongues is enough to convince you he is channeling a spirit.
My grandfather was a minister and educator in the church
for over 70 years... but he always believed in
science, in
global warming, in the work of educated men and women, and understood the Bible better than any man.
«I pointed out the planet has existed
for four billion years,» Yeo said earlier in our interview, as he outlined his rationale on the
science underpinning
global warming.
On March 2, in response to a call
for information pertaining to the
science of evolution and
global warming, AAAS CEO Alan Leshner wrote two Tennessee State Representatives a letter on the subjects.
Those who know more about climate
science,
for example, are slightly more likely to accept that
global warming is real and caused by humans than those who know less on the subject.
For Republicans, the more knowledge they have about climate
science the less likely they are to accept the theory of anthropogenic
global warming (whereas Democrats» confidence goes up).
In a state famous
for putting evolution on trial in the 20th century, teachers will now be able to avoid instructing students on the
science behind
global warming
Sagarin hopes that the results, appearing in the 26 October issue of
Science, will encourage others to look
for environmental responses to
global warming in data sets collected informally by individuals or communities, like a bird - watcher's records.
How do
science deniers manage to convince themselves that the evidence
for global warming, evolution and vaccine safety is so much fake news?
«Our findings mean that nature is not as efficient in slowing
global warming as we previously thought,» said Kees Jan van Groenigen, research fellow at the Center
for Ecosystem
Science and Society at NAU and lead author of the study.
When it comes to major environmental problems such as
global warming, he believes that our ability to cope depends on a broad - based educational push
for earth
sciences, of the kind we already have
for biology and public health.
The basic physics of climate change have been known
for more than a century, but it is in recent decades that the fundamental
science of
global warming has solidified
«Using more recent data and better analysis methods we have been able to re-examine the
global weather balloon network, known as radiosondes, and have found clear indications of
warming in the upper troposphere,» said lead author ARC Centre of Excellence
for Climate System
Science Chief Investigator Prof Steve Sherwood.
«Considering the Southern Ocean absorbs something like 60 % of heat and anthropogenic CO2 that enters the ocean, this wind has a noticeable effect on
global warming,» said lead author Dr Andy Hogg from the Australian National University Hub of the ARC Centre of Excellence
for Climate System
Science.
The new study measured how four sixth - grade
science textbooks adopted
for use in California frame the subject of
global warming.
New research published in Geophysical Research Letters by University of Melbourne scientists at the ARC Centre of Excellence
for Climate System
Science shows that a positive IPO would likely produce a sharp acceleration in
global warming over the next decade.
Cooney himself made 294 edits to the administration's 364 - page Strategic Plan
for the U.S. Climate Change
Science Program posted July 24, 2003, «to exaggerate or emphasize scientific uncertainties or to deemphasize or diminish the importance of the human role in
global warming,» and Cooney and the CEQ played a role in eliminating climate change sections in the EPA's draft Report on the Environment as well as its National Air Quality and Emissions Trends Report.
Glacier seismology is a relatively new area of
science, but interest has been growing in the possibilities
for detecting the extent of
global warming's impact in the vibrations it causes beneath the Earth's surface.
IPCC, an international organization founded in 1988 by the United Nations, is best known
for its lengthy, periodic reports assessing climate
science and policy options
for curbing
global warming.
«We expect the first heavy precipitation events with a clear
global warming signal will appear during winters in Russia, Canada and northern Europe over the next 10 - 30 years,» said co-author Dr Ed Hawkins from the National Centre
for Atmospheric
Science at the University of Reading, UK.
«We examined average and extreme temperatures because they were always projected to be the measure that is most sensitive to
global warming,» said lead author from the ARC Centre of Excellence
for Climate System
Science, Dr Andrew King.
Here in the States we use Fahrenheit
for weather, Celsius
for science, Fahrenheit
for body temperature, and Celsius — often — in our discussions of
global warming.
► In Books et al., Gavin Schmidt of NASA's Goddard Institute
for Space Studies panned Behind the Curve:
Science and the Politics of
Global Warming by Joshua P. Howe.
«When we included projected Antarctic wind shifts in a detailed
global ocean model, we found water up to 4 °C
warmer than current temperatures rose up to meet the base of the Antarctic ice shelves,» said lead author Dr Paul Spence from the ARC Centre of Excellence
for Climate System
Science (ARCCSS).
Results of a new study by researchers at the Northeast Climate
Science Center (NECSC) at the University of Massachusetts Amherst suggest that temperatures across the northeastern United States will increase much faster than the
global average, so that the 2 - degrees Celsius
warming target adopted in the recent Paris Agreement on climate change will be reached about 20 years earlier
for this part of the U.S. compared to the world as a whole.
Three years ago,
for example, Texas revised its
science teaching standards to require that students «analyse and evaluate different views on the existence of
global warming».
If
science can nail climate change as a probable cause of deadly weather events, like the heatwave that hit Europe in the summer of 2003, then
global warming becomes a matter
for product liability law.
But the win was also a hopeful sign
for scientists who have watched from the sidelines in disbelief as politicians cut
science funding and distorted research on evolution, stem cells and
global warming.
Those are some of the key messages in the «Summary
for Policymakers» of the physical
science of
global warming from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change released on September 27.
(Reuters)- The U.S. electric industry knew as far back as 1968 that burning fossil fuels might cause
global warming, but cast doubt on the
science of climate change and ramped up coal use
for decades afterward, an environmental watchdog group said on Tuesday.
«There is no slowdown in
global warming,» Russell Vose, the head of the climate
science division at the National Centers
for Environmental Information (NCEI), said.
Noah Diffenbaugh, a professor of earth system
science at Stanford University, was the lead author of a study in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences released last week detailing a four - step framework
for testing whether
global warming contributes to record - setting weather events.
And the question of how
science on the fringe should be dealt with remains open: some observers say that Meldrum, who has been lambasted by colleagues and passed over
for promotion twice, should just be left alone to do his thing; others counter that in this era of creationism,
global warming denial, and widespread antiscience sentiment and scientific illiteracy, it is particularly imperative that bad
science be soundly scrutinized and exposed.
My colleague Mark Fischetti (senior editor and partner - in - crime
for many of the Graphic
Science items in the magazine) was intrigued by bipartisan agreement on questions related to
global warming in the survey results shown in -LSB-...]
«
Science tells us that we can not say with any certainty what constitutes a dangerous level of
warming, and therefore what level must be avoided,» Paula Dobriansky, under secretary of state
for global affairs and the leader of the American delegation, said in her remarks to the conference.»
Climate projections need to account
for enhanced
warming due to
global warming feedbacks as discussed by James Zachos, professor of Earth
sciences at the University of California, Santa Cruz at the annual meeting of the American Association
for the Advancement of
Science (AAAS) in St. Louis in Feb, 2006.
Discover Magazine's # 1 story in
science for 2004 is that «Evidence of
global warming became so overwhelming in 2004 that now the question is: What can we do about it?»
Dr. Hermann Ott, German
global warming mobber who not long ago called
for a
science pogrom aimed at skeptics of dubious
global warming science, brings our attention here to a planned conference at the Bundestag in Berlin on June 10, 2011.
The U.S. press is either woefully ignorant of the state of the
science, or is deliberately trying to find explanations
for various regional weather and climate changes that don't involve any mention of «
global warming» — and that approach relies on the «natural cycle» argument.
«This widespread retreat of mountain glaciers may be our clearest evidence of
global warming as they integrate many climate variables,» Professor Thompson told the American Association
for the Advancement of
Science conference in San Francisco.
«The reason
for the layering is that
global warming in parts of Antarctica is causing land - based ice to melt, adding massive amounts of freshwater to the ocean surface,» said ARC Centre of Excellence
for Climate System
Science researcher Prof Matthew England an author of the paper.
Back in May the University Corporation
for Atmospheric Research hosted a National Climate Adaptation Summit that brought together roughly 150 people representing the US
science, business and policy communities
for a three - day conversation about coping with the impacts of
global warming.
For an example, once a week, the Idso's «CO2
Science» web site would cherry pick a single station in the US Historical Climatology Network that happened to show cooling, to «prove that there has been no
global warming in the past 70 years.»
Speaking at an annual meeting of the American Association
for the Advancement of
Science, Barnett said climate models based on air temperatures are weak because most of the evidence
for global warming is not even there.
For years, we at Greenpeace have been working to make public the secret paper trails that show what everyone already knows: climate science deniers - #Fakexperts - are few and far between, and most of them are paid by companies most responsible for global warming to downplay the probl
For years, we at Greenpeace have been working to make public the secret paper trails that show what everyone already knows: climate
science deniers - #Fakexperts - are few and far between, and most of them are paid by companies most responsible
for global warming to downplay the probl
for global warming to downplay the problem.
The purpose is to take a broader view, to reach across boundaries and strive towards a common goal, realizing that
science and technology will not suffice to reach a 2 °C target
for global warming if citizens do not accept to change their behaviors as well and act accordingly.