For more than a week, the episode has fueled a fierce debate on the blogosphere and in newspaper opinion columns and once again placed
global warming science under intense scrutiny.
Not exact matches
«
Science tells us that we can not say with any certainty what constitutes a dangerous level of
warming, and therefore what level must be avoided,» Paula Dobriansky,
under secretary of state for
global affairs and the leader of the American delegation, said in her remarks to the conference.»
«The polar bear was the first species protected
under the Endangered Species Act solely because of threats from
global warming,» said Shaye Wolf, climate
science director for the Center for Biological Diversity, an environmental group.
Under the heading «
Science Links» are some very helpful links, especially the very first one, Spencer Weart's on - line book The Discovery of
Global Warming.
But, no, anyone who gets their climate
science from the WSJ editorial pages (and I suspect many influential business leaders do) will still be
under the impression that the MSU data proves that
global warming's a myth...
«
Science tells us that we can not say with any certainty what constitutes a dangerous level of
warming, and therefore what level must be avoided,» Paula Dobriansky,
under secretary of state for
global affairs and the leader of the American delegation, said in her remarks to the conference.»
The
science is clear to me and to most experts in the various fields associated with climate
science: Humans are causing most of the observed
global warming in the past several decades and, if we continue emitting GHGs
under a «business as usual» scenario, it will become increasingly difficult and costly to adapt to the changes that are likely to occur.
Under Smith's leadership the House
Science, Space and Technology Committee has held hearings that have critically examined
global warming.
Posted in Carbon, CLIMATE
SCIENCE, Development and Climate Change, Disaster and Emergency, Disasters and Climate Change, Ecosystem Functions, Environment,
Global Warming, Green House Gas Emissions, Information and Communication, International Agencies, Land, News, Publication, Research, Resilience, River, Vulnerability, Water Comments Off on Climate Change May Bring Bigger Waves For Down
Under
Filed
under Climate Alarmism, Climate Change, Co2 Insanity,
Global Warming, NOAA, Piers Corbyn,
Science, Sea - Level, The Met Office, Weather
Filed
under Climate Alarmism, Climate Change, Climate Disruption, Co2 Insanity,
Global Warming, Government, NASA, NOAA, Politics, Sattelitegate,
Science, Truth Stranger than Fiction
Secondly,
under the stated methodology of the paper it is perfectly possible for studied not * primarily * about climate
science to be included if the abstract implies or states that human caused
global warming is real.
He manages to publish articles by every biased organisation
under the sun from
global warming sceptics, real
science poo pooers, ideological nutcases, one eyed fossil fuel lobbyists, sycophants of large business politicos, and the would be destroyers of public services and regulation.
Why on earth Mr Lacis raves on about the ins and outs of the technical issues
under discussion in the area of climate
science /
global warming when it is the issue of the ethical and legal aspects of Gleick's actions that are the immediate issue.
This same practice of Lysenkoism has long been
under way in western
science in regard to the politically correct theory of man caused, catastrophic,
global warming.
Thanks, I have this included already in the The Anti «Man - Made»
Global Warming Resource
under Greenland - Heat From Earth's Magma Contributing To Melting Of Greenland Ice (
Science Daily)
If your position is that
global warming skeptic scientists operate
under guidance from industries opposing CO2 regulation, are you prepared to provide specific proof of improper payments to those scientists, and specific proof of faults in the scientists» resulting reports that are obvious indications of industry - guided
science errors?
«Given the scrutiny that climate change
science is currently
under, attributing biological changes to
global warming should surely require the highest standards of proof.»
Collectively and pursuant to statutory authority,
under the direction of these Executive Offices, the USGCRP directed an effort statutorily dedicated in part to studying the state of the
science and its uncertainties surrounding the theory of «
global warming» or «climate change,» ultimately producing the National Assessment.
«Climate
science» as it is used by warmists implies adherence to a set of beliefs: (1) Increasing greenhouse gas concentrations will
warm the Earth's surface and atmosphere; (2) Human production of CO2 is producing significant increases in CO2 concentration; (3) The rate of rise of temperature in the 20th and 21st centuries is unprecedented compared to the rates of change of temperature in the previous two millennia and this can only be due to rising greenhouse gas concentrations; (4) The climate of the 19th century was ideal and may be taken as a standard to compare against any current climate; (5)
global climate models, while still not perfect, are good enough to indicate that continued use of fossil fuels at projected rates in the 21st century will cause the CO2 concentration to rise to a high level by 2100 (possibly 700 to 900 ppm); (6) The
global average temperature
under this condition will rise more than 3 °C from the late 19th century ideal; (7) The negative impact on humanity of such a rise will be enormous; (8) The only alternative to such a disaster is to immediately and sharply reduce CO2 emissions (reducing emissions in 2050 by 80 % compared to today's rate) and continue further reductions after 2050; (9) Even with such draconian CO2 reductions, the CO2 concentration is likely to reach at least 450 to 500 ppm by 2100 resulting in significant damage to humanity; (10) Such reductions in CO2 emissions are technically feasible and economically affordable while providing adequate energy to a growing world population that is increasingly industrializing.
I read often a
Science Daily News
under the
Global Warming section where often I find interesting studies and articles on AGW subjects, but sometimes articles appear that really reach to blame things on AGW like some guy carrying a bowl of cereal across his living room accidently slips his big toe under a loop in his carpet, trips falls, spills his cereal, falls over a piece of furniture and exhales a abnormally large amount of CO2 followed by a burst of expletives (more CO2) leading to increased warming in his neighb
Warming section where often I find interesting studies and articles on AGW subjects, but sometimes articles appear that really reach to blame things on AGW like some guy carrying a bowl of cereal across his living room accidently slips his big toe
under a loop in his carpet, trips falls, spills his cereal, falls over a piece of furniture and exhales a abnormally large amount of CO2 followed by a burst of expletives (more CO2) leading to increased
warming in his neighb
warming in his neighborhood.
Basic point being, these are people collectively operate in the realm of «climate change sociology»
under the unsupportable premise that man - caused
global warming is settled
science, thus it is up to them to explain to the rest of us what's wrong with the mindset of skeptic climate scientists....
The NOAA study was published in June 2015 by the journal
Science under the title «Possible artifacts of data biases in the recent
global surface
warming hiatus.»
Examples of
science fiction based on devastating climate change are Ready (1998), well - meaning but scarcely noticed; Turner (1989), a story of civilization collapsing
under the pressures of war and economic forces as well as
global warming (noted fairly widely for its literary quality); and, by two of the field's major authors, Silverberg (1994)(little noted), emphasizing the greed, stupidity and ambitions that were bringing vast destruction through ozone as well as
global warming, and Sterling (1995), where colossal storms mingle with stormy political conspiracy.
Cherry, the author of many children's books on the environment, and Braasch, a photojournalist and the author of Earth
Under Fire, a book on
global warming for grown - ups, also offer
science lessons that students can apply to any research inquiry.
Under Watson's tenure, the IPCC last year produced its third comprehensive assessment of the state of climate
science, concluding that» [t] here is new and stronger evidence that most of the
warming observed over the last 50 years is attributable to human activities,» and predicting that average
global temperatures will rise between 3 and 10 degrees Fahrenheit by the endof the century — conclusions reaffirmed last spring at White House request by the National Academy of Sciences.
I did not say that Abelson was necessarily a
global warming skeptic, though many web sites seem anxious to debunk the idea (or at least so I found out in the last couple of days), my point was that
under his editorship
Science was open to publishing articles whose findings were not supportive of the theory.
Filed
under Climategate, Co2 Insanity,
Global Warming,
Science, Truth Stranger than Fiction, Weather
via:
Science Codex Ocean Dead Zones Ocean «Dead Zones» Increasing: 400 Oxygen - Deprived Areas Now Exist Tropical Dead Zones Set to Expand by 50 %
Under Climate Change Corn Ethanol Worsens Gulf of Mexico Dead Zone A Primer of
Global Warming - Caused Marine Dead Zones
WSJ: Concerned Scientists Reply on
Global Warming NOAA: January 2012 the fourth
warmest for the contiguous United States VOA: Cold Snap Slugs Europe; Thaw a Threat MSN: Cold wave hits Europe: In pictures YAHOO: Europe struggles
under record cold snap WSJ: No Need to Panic About
Global Warming NASA
Science News: What's to Blame for Wild Weather?
So we're not congratulating Mr. Obama as much as celebrating the coming of an era where
science is highly regarded rather than shunned,
global warming is put
under scrutiny rather than laughed off, and ideas like renewable energy and green jobs are embraced rather than ignored.
I do recommend reading «The Discovery of
Global Warming» by Spencer Weart, first link
under the
science section of the sidebar.
The Climate Scientists» Register does just that by focusing solely on the most important of the climate
science topics
under debate — is human produced carbon dioxide leading to dangerous
global warming, or not?»