Sentences with phrase «global warming theory»

We are not aware of any explanation that squares the man - made global warming theory with that fact.

The scientific foundation of global warming theory contains much more than a few tree - rings and the temperature during the Medieval Warm Period.

Of course this does not accord with anthropogenic global warming theory.

Scientists have thus far been unable to explain why there was no warming even though global warming theory predicts there would have been warming.

Most of those who embrace global warming theories blindly follow the biases of their political crowd without reading the reports and researching the science.

We can not reject the hypothesis that the coefficient is 1, that is that the two temperature series move together in the way predicted by standard global warming theory.

The man - made global warming theory assumes that increasing carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations will cause global warming by increasing the greenhouse effect.

And the dangerous global warming theory demonstrates nothing more than the human capacity for panic (or an attempt to cause panic in order to increase profits and / or political power).

Traditional global warming theory would suggest winter warming trends, but several regions such as those we deal with here have a negative trend in temperature over the last 25 years.

His story was picked up by hundreds of other climate change deniers, some of whom went so far as to claim that it destroyed global warming theory.

Global Warming theory states, more powerful and frequent storms, right in the «end of days» chapter.

Additionally, climate «skeptics» have yet to put forth a plausible, coherent, internally consistent alternative to challenge the robust man - made global warming theory.

This is false, global warming theory does not predict less extreme weather.

The regulation of Carbon Dioxide in our atmosphere should be left to God and not government and I oppose all measures of Cap and Trade as well as the teaching of global warming theory in our schools.

The «death of manmade global warming theory» lasted 70 minutes last week, showing the amazing power of the Web to amplify, and then dismantle, fictions at light speed.

Given there is much more water vapour in the lower levels of the atmosphere, the study really found that there was a decline in overall global relative humidity when global warming theory suggests it should stay more - or-less stable.

Or did Mr. Tobias previously believe that man needed to be fewer and poorer, and become enthusiastic about global warming theory as a clever packaging for ideas most of the world's population would reject?

There is also some anecdotal evidence suggesting that some peer reviewers and editors have been actively trying to prevent critics of man - made global warming theory from publishing their research, e.g., here, here, here, here and here.

In fact, many skeptics believe that the continued positive reception of catastrophic global warming theory is a function of the general scientific illiteracy of Americans and points to a need for more and better science education (see here for an overview of the climate debate that does not once use the ad hominem words «myth», «scam» or «lie»).

I have earned my living for the past 30 years as a scientist, and I have reviewed the so - called science behind global warming theory extensively for the past 2 - 3 years.

After 20 years of academic supremacy and hundreds of billions of dollars of costs; the Anthropogenic Global Warming theory seems headed for the dust bin of history.

Fox Nation also promoted a New York Post op - ed on the Monnett investigation with the headline «Global Warming Theory Faces Sudden Collapse.»

For example, he was once quoted as saying, «I'm not a scientist, but I read enough scientific literature to know the whole global warming theory is bonkers.

This represents a significant shift in tone — from couched to relatively confident — for the panel of hundreds of scientists, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which issued two previous assessments of the research into global warming theory, in 1995 and 1990.

A cache of leaked emails that show some leading global warming theory proponents acting less than nobly has caught the attention not only of the New York Times but also of the Charlottesville - based scientist often slammed by the errant emailers.

Suddenly, the media had a narrative they understood (coverup and malfeasance) that somehow allowed them to question catastrophic global warming theory when they were unwilling to do so on the basis of flaws in the science.

Just like global warming theory, the entire greenie case for the polar bear being in any kind of danger rests not on real life observations but on computer modelled projections and idle speculation.

Real scientists and real intellectuals will never stop questioning or testing global warming theories because real people simply want to know the truth and do what is right.

1 Before the winds shifted, measurements of air temperatures in the 80s and 90s reported a slight cooling trend that contradicted global warming theory.2

Climatologists are always looking for good junk scientists to support their phony liberal Global Warming theory, and you're a liberal junk scientist of the first order.

Ironically, some of the most damning evidence again the AGW or Anthropogenic Global Warming Theory comes from Al Gore himself.

Anecdotal evidence didn't start global warming theories, or plate tectonics.

«Current global warming theory dictates that CO2 has been a major driver of climate change throughout the 20th century (Ref, ref, ref, ref, ref).

The founding director of the institute, Dr. Robert Jastrow, who ran the institute from 1961 - 1981, was a major critic of man - made global warming theory until his death in 2008, e.g., see this 2001 essay.

The University of East Anglia's CRU has told the public it no longer stores the raw data upon which it bases its famous global warming theory.