Sentences with phrase «go about answering these questions»

There are three ways to go about answering this question.

For Stan Khury, here's one way to go about answering questions like yours.

There are several ways you can go about answering questions like this.

A good way to go about answering this question would be to speak about the skills and abilities that you gained in your previous job and the ways in which it would help you to execute your responsibilities in the new work profile.

Not exact matches

When answering the question about chip cards, Netflix's Wells also said, «We're only part of the way through [the transition], so U.S. issuers are going to continue that in Q4.»

You're not going to get the answers you need if it seems like you might be looking into downsizing or restructuring, so be explicit about why you're asking these questions and how honest answers will help your employees get the solutions they need.

Determining your upper and lower bound when it comes to insuring purchases is the best way to go about answering the looming question: to insure or not to insure, Economist Jay Zagorsky recommends.

Going into a meeting without first letting people know about its scope will only result in sub-optimized decisions and endless questions that should've been answered beforehand.

If the answer was no — that the employee in question had no idea they were about to be let go — then my manager simply wasn't doing their job.

Use all your social channels to talk about your industry in general, to be a thought leader, to give tips on how to evaluate your kind of products and to answer the questions that purchasing agents should be asking to help them identify the best company to go with.

In silence, you can ask yourself questions about how your life and work are really going and pause to wait for the answer.

This book answers questions that The Book of Awesome didn't, which is how do we actually go about living this happy life?

Think about every conversation you've had, go back more than one day if you need to, and think about the questions you've been called upon to answer.

It's a way out for them to get out of social situations they don't feel comfortable in, while allowing them to not have to suffer consequences or answer a million questions about where they were or what was going on.

You can also Estimate Your Benefits by going to the Social Security website and answering some questions about yourself and your income, it will give you a good idea of what to expect when you retire.

The post goes into lots of detail about why it's important to ask each question and how each interviewee's answer should be structured.

Notifications began going out Tuesday, hours before Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg appeared before a congressional hearing to answer questions about the Cambridge Analytica data leak.

When Facebook went to Washington last fall to answer questions about Russian ads appearing on the service ahead of the 2016 presidential election, Facebook sent its top lawyer to testify instead of Zuckerberg.

As a very old man, one who has worked at developing some kind of understanding of who we are, what we are, why we are here, and where we are going, I can tell you that no one has definitive answers, but without some underlying system of belief about these questions you will not grow old gracefully.

Well there are good answers to all of these questions, if you would just go and approach someone knowledgeable about the subject and have an intelligent discussion.

this is not told on the survey slip - it makes it sound like you go answer some question about your experience as a customer and thats it.

yes much has to be discerned in the book of remembrance, so called OT, for the priest did all go astray from the ways of YHWH, but one must read, pray, and do the righteous ways of YHWH to get His anointment to understand, and call 1-773-874-0325, YHWH Our Righteousness, the Movement, and arm, and Branch of YHWH, prophesied in Jeremiah 23 vs. 1 - 8, and Jeremiah 33 vs. 14 - 21, also as described in Isaiah 59, and Malachi 3 vs.1 - 4, to get any answers to any questions about this book.

The same goes for a commitment to other believers, or various works of the Holy Spirit, or even having all their questions answered about the Trinity, the authority of Scripture, or the origin of the universe.

The belief in a world beyond, where the souls of the dead go, is an attempt to answer the question about the status of what has been but no longer is.

I knew this question was going to come up when I agreed to do this, so I've been thinking about this answer for quite a while.

@HotAirAce «when are you going to answer my question about more recent violence, almost entirely due to religion not atheism?»

Chad, when are you going to answer my question about more recent violence, almost entirely due to religion not atheism?

My wife recently went to a doctor about some health problems she was experiencing, and it quickly became obvious to her that he did not care to hear about her symptoms, take the time to answer her question, or explain to her what was happening.

I wanted to find a priest to answer my questions about Jesus, but was afraid to go to church in case they thought I was a troublemaker.

did anyone take the quiz... there is a question about what is the religion of most people in indonesia... the answer is muslim, yet... the picture that goes along with the question and answer is confused... i think i saw an elephant trunk on the idols face... maybe the folks who put together the quiz and slide show should brush up on thier religious and cultural studies as well...

The question is where the ultimate questions about the significance of life and one «s moral responsibility are going to be asked, and from what source will come the proposed answers.

You get the sense that he doesn't have the time to do murder boards with his staff about how he is going to answer questions.

How do we go about increasing our knowledge and finding the answers to our basic questions?

If you deny it, go ahead and answer my question about other minds and evidence.

Instead of claiming to be the Answer, go out and find some questions first, because you've clearly never had any about this subject (your pre / assumptions are profoundly unfortunate).

But, to answer your question, I think Lincoln was right to free the slaves; I just think he went about it the wrong way.

Before I attempt to answer this important question about what Jesus means when He says «go and sin no more,» let me state two disclaimers.

I went from knowing all the answers about Christianity to asking a lot of pesky questions about Christianity.

But actually requiring a dialogue, question and answer, interactive discussion about a text of Scripture, which then leads to brainstorming about how everybody can go out and put it into practice in tangible ways, and then actually going out and doing it, requires too much for most people.

I was asked a lot of questions about other verses as well - what Christians believe about the second coming (one of the worst jobs we've done of helping non-Christians understand) I told them I did not have all the answers of everything God was going to do and exactly how everything would work out, that may be what you're referring to.

On a side note: To everyone who asked about Pascal's Wager, you could've answered your own question by Googling «Pascal's Wager,» going to the first link (Wikipedia), and reading the article:) That's the case with a lot of Christian «arguments for god.»

I created this guide to answer your questions and provide information based on facts about living plant - based and how to go about it.

To answer questions and build up an assortment takes both interest in the allergic customer as well as knowledge about allergies and what could happen if it go wrong.

You can find him pulling espresso shots and answering questions from coffee - drinkers about where to go, what to see, and what to eat and drink while they're in Texas's most populous city.

Anyway - I am going to sit back and enjoy my millet rhubarb muffin, sip on a cup of my most favourite tea ever and hang out online to make sure I am at the ready to answer any questions you may have about our UnDiet Meal Prep Made Easy program.

The last time these talks were going on, there was still a question mark in many Arsenal fans» minds about whether the speedy striker would ever realise his early promise, but that has largely been answered with Theo finally showing that he is a great finisher.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

This season was looking better and we seemed to have answered the ongoing questions about mental strength, big game attitude, battling qualities and more, but then we go and blow it again.

It's pretty clear at this point that it's going to be tough to get anyone from the Patriots to answer any more questions about the scandal or its investigation, at least in the media.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...