Sentences with phrase «go under anything»

Not exact matches

When that company resume you create for your agency if anything goes wrong and it goes under, your brand goes with it, your resume goes missing.

We, on the other hand, view it with hope: because more than anything, the events of the past few days show that the truth is getting out — the truth that capital markets simply can not exist under the authoritarian rule of central planners, the truth that the stock market is a casino in which the best one can hope for a quick flip, and finally the truth that our entire socio - economic regime, whose existence has been predicated by borrowing from the uncreated wealth of the future, and where accumulated debt could be wiped out at the flip of a switch if things go wrong in the process obliterating the welfare of billions (of less than 1 % ers), is one big lie.

When there was not grace and when the world was under the law, when there was as issue that God handle he had no mercy on us, we he instructed David to go and kill everything man women and children and including animals don't leave anything alive.

I think of the book of Hebrews, where the author is intent to show that Jesus Christ is far superior to anything which was offered under the Mosaic Law, and after we have Jesus, to go back to such things is sheer folly.

Some, under the pressure of such a conviction as this, go to all lengths in denying that the Gospels do in fact bring us anything else than a completely accurate record of Jesus» life and words.

I think an employer has a moral obligation to be concerned about the welfare of one's employee's — maybe not legally required (to a degree)-- i wish it were simple that people could just quit an employer that had no concern for the people so that enterprise would go under or wise up — i think though employers are actually more upset about money instead of morals — women and doctors should be deciding such issues — i do not know y i even bother posting since i know these posts will not actually affect anything --

The US has only been «under god» or «in god we trust» since the 50s when a bunch of people got scarred of the evil communists and thought that this was going to do anything.

I don't think it's so much about the levites being paid for their service it's about us doing what's right toward Pastors that must feed and tend to the flock of GOD if GOD has called them.JESUS even said in luke 10:7 that the laborers are worthy of their wages.In luke 8 1 - 4 it's says even JESUS HIMSELF recieved financial support from the women who ministered to him with their possessions.Now most people today would say he should have been ashamed of taking money from those poor women but JESUS accepted their support and they was blessed for sowing onto the LORD»S work.1 Corinthains 9:1 - 15 says dint muzzle the ox while it tread out the grain was GOD talking about oxes no he was talking about those who labor in the ministry.Who goes to war at their own expense.Or who goes to war but pay for their clothes, guns, etc.No one because the goverment if that country provide these things because of the soilders service.Who plants a vineyard and don't eat from it.Who tends a flock and don't drink the milk of it.I think it's just spiritual sense to support a pastor that's teaching you the word, casting out devils, laying hands and healing is manifesting in people lived, going to hospitails, prisons, and house calls to pray for the sick and shut in, going to graduations and funnerals, praying and fasting for himself and the flock.I think a person who think a pastor shouldn't be paid for their service either don't know they need to be paid and need to be taught or they are demonic in their thinking and either hate GOD, PASTORS, AND GOD»S PEOPLE.Why do nt you hear people saying anything against the dope dealers, strip clubs, dope houses, liquor stores, etc.It's only when people give into the LORD»S work that evil minded or misinformed people have a problem with it.No sir we don't have to use the old testament to show that we should support out pastors.You don't use the law, love tells me to support the pastor.Under the new testament LOVE is the greatest of all.Love for GOD and man.If GOD asked for 10 percent under the law to support the levites who didn't have all the responsibilities of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLESS.

You can find any flavored sangria recipe under the sun so anything goes!

«I feel for them [farmers], I can't think of anything worse than going all the way through the season thinking something's going to be the case and you get the rug pulled out from under you right at the end.

Bettors will pick up on just about anything and I guess it's already public knowledge that little old Bradley goes under the total like it's their job.

I very much doubt whether it will have raised anything but amusement in the Arsenal boss and the Chelsea coach will have to do a lot better if he is going to get under the skin of the Frenchman before the weekend.

I don't feel like we are scoring when the ball is under his feet (one goal against liverpool when.the ball is under his feet doesn't prove anything for me) Please for just a while i want you to imagine the king thiery or even robin leading our line up and then go back to giroud and tell me what do you feel about it

Now I see what you do on your free time beside watching pics of WENGER, whatever you think or say my argument is true, and unfortunately because of WENGERS job security is that we are not going to win anything important under his watch.....

You're not jinxing anything as nothing is going to happen we won't be adding any quality even rubbish players like Yedder are rejecting playing under the specialist of failure Wenger!

If Alcantara's summary of Ancelotti's early impact is anything to go by, the German champions are confident about their prospects under the new man.

Not gonna win anything under Wenger, Gazidis and Kroenke.

That could well be provided by the exciting crop of under - 21s who are, if their 5 - 0 victory Bosnia - Herzegovina is anything to go by, fairing a lot better than their seniors.

They went from saying Arsenal will never win anything mark my words to Arsenal will never win the prem under Arsene, before someone reminds them that actually happened.

Jason Day doesn't seem to encounter anything especially hard in this game right now and he went out, one day after matching the course record with a 63 and posted a 6 - under 66.

Now that the stubborn man has signed two years contract with the club, my biggest fear is not that Arsenal under Kroenke and mr i know it all (wenger) will continue to sink for the next two years but that Arsenal fans will give it a rest, fold their arms and see this great club going down right before their eyes without taking necessary actions like refusing to buy anything from the club, renewing season ticket etc

Which one of us WASNT watching the fight under the assumption that Khabib was going to and just wanted to see what, if anything, Al could do?

The Patriots (who I highlighted as a good season win total under) were unable to get anything going in the second half against division rival Miami.

I initially realised Wenger was never going to accomplish anything with Arsenal when he sold rvp to united, under no circumstances should this have happened, i think van persie, nasri and cesc were opinionated players and them leaving caused wenger to appoint players with little to no character and now we have no real leaders, at least anyone who can back it up with ability.

And i don't care how many assists ozil gets he hasn't done anything when the going gets tough he is the first one to crack under the pressure just come running at him he will lose the ball.WALCOTT IS NOT A FOOTBALLER FULL STOP.

Anything can happen under the lights at Mitchell Field when these two squads go toe - to - toe in Flag Football!

even though there is no proof of him personally taking any money out of the club they would have to declare it under these new financial regulations that have come in, any and all monies going out of the club has to be put in black and white on the accounts and i didn't see that kronke has taken anything when i read them the other day.

With all the troubles of Jack Wilshere, Abou Diaby, Aaron Ramsey and all in recent years that would take some doing, but for a short time not long after the restart of the international friendly between Germany and Finland last night, Gooners everywhere were crossing our fingers, toes and anything else crossable after our brand new transfer acquisition Shkodran Mustafi went down under a hefty challenge and looked like he might not be able to carry on.

At any rate who cares if Le Coq ai nt going to the euro's it does nt affect us, it also worth noting that the season ticket letters go out in a few weeks wich means we will be linked to every player under the sun until that time is done and then we'll end up with noone new cos as Wenger said last season «there are no available players out there who are better than what we have» nice play on words there the key word being «Available» No one is available unless its on a freeand that means they are too old or are sh!t Wenger just wont spend the money that we do have but he has too if he wants to win anything worth a damn

The team enjoys a technical partnership with Ferrari, under which it's allowed to use certain Ferrari parts (such as the suspension), but some teams are questioning whether there's anything more going on.

The guy, like many former Arsenal players (including Henry) had come to realize they were not going win anything major under Wenger.

Arsenal seem to be operating under Murphy's Law at the moment, which states that anything that can go wrong, will go wrong.

Under 2.5 goals on this one is running at 5/6 and that is likely the only way that the Clarets are going to get close to getting anything out of this.

But because of the great defensive setup that the Clarets have going for them at the moment, it may be worth a flutter on the under 2.5 goals option at bet365 for a price of 11/10 because they aren't going to give up anything easy.

KEY FACT: Man Utd have won 25 of a possible 27 points in league home matches against Stoke MATCH ODDS: Man Utd 2/9 Draw 6/1 Stoke 14/1 bet365 Pick: Under 2.5 goals @ 6/4 ANDY SAYS: Have to go with Man U, don't see Stoke getting anything here... 2 - 0 GRAEME SAYS: Home win, Stoke might put up a fight but they won't get anything... 3 - 1 SILKY SAYS: Easy home win, don't see anything else... 5 - 0 FOOTBALLIndex — One to follow: Marcus Rashford is very much one to watch in the Index

& Parker under immense pressure & to make matters worse Harry subs VDV., for the last couple of games (modric) hasn't contributed anything of note, maybe he is more concerned where his going next season.In hindsight Harry must get his injury defenders up & running or get better defenders, because other teams thrive on defenders backpeddling into their own box.This has been our worst defeat in an FA Cup since i've been supporting this team & that's a very long time.

But that's football my friends, international football at least, and is anything going to change under the new uninspiring leadership of Infantino?

Yes, just like disposable diapers or anything else that goes inside of a plastic bag and buried under layers of dirty and garbage — tampons and pads will sit in your landfill for an eternity.

Yes, just like disposable diapers or anything else that goes inside of a plastic bag and buried under layers of dirty and garbage - tampons and pads will sit in your landfill for an eternity.

Presumably the people who need a cult are going to be quite happy and accepting while under its influence and not question anything the Leader says.

I posted here and there about how it was going, though I'm pretty sure I didn't mention my antepartum depression (depression during pregnancy) because I had it under control and I didn't want people to know anything really personal about me.

I am truly relaxed, not because I'm going in under an illusion that hypnobirthing will magically give me a zen birth, but rather that anything could happen, and I'll be ready with all my heart.

«It is like once you get into politics, you throw discipline to the dogs, you are not under any law, you can do anything you want as a politician and it is that character that is going through... There are structures, party structures, legal structures but because you are in politics, the people who are actually activating the political system, they think that once I am in politics; I can push discipline and the law to the side and the policeman can not even do anything to me,» he lamented.

Under that circumstance, there would be no options except to change the rules (or suspend them, as per Rule 32), after which anything goes.

Meanwhile, multiple $ billions flow into the MTA and the Transportation Trust Fund every year under «dedicated» taxes, but it all goes to interest on past debts, leaving anything that Cuomo doesn't cut a ribbon on to deteriorate.

Well, if you're going to compare it to supply - and - confidence then you have to examine what that deal would have entailed: it blatantly would not have been «Tories do whatever they like» but it would not have been «Lib Dems get to veto anything they feel like» either - so, if you are going to compare it to supply and confidence, then let's hear it: what do you imagine would be different under such circumstances?

There is no motivation under this system for parties to go into elections pretending anything other than that they hate each other equally.

«At some point, there's going to be another conference, and there's going to be another discussion and under those circumstances, we will have a consensus whatever it may be, and that's what we will operate under until something changes, if anything.»

Last night a spokesman for Jeremy's leadership campaign, said:» This result clearly shows that there is a desire for real and genuine change in our party under the continued leadership of Jeremy Corbyn, but we are not going to take anything for granted and we will be campaigning for every vote in the leadership contest.»

And in fact it very well might be that once the ribosomes cease functioning properly, then anything can cause bees to go under.»