Sentences with phrase «go under things»

Stupid tricks like allowing you to jump down in certain areas and not others, go under things in one place that they want you to go with their cute little graphic but not allow you to go into others.

Now that I know these tissue turtlenecks go under things so well, I'm going to start wearing them more and more.

Not exact matches

The same thing goes for most business entities that want to do business under a name other than the company name.

His departure from Avid Life represents a tacit acknowledgment that things went very badly under his watch, and that as CEO, he bears ultimate responsibility for it.

Things can go in a million different directions, and the more time you spend worrying about the possibilities, the less time you'll spend focusing on taking action that will calm you down and keep your stress under control.

But anyway, so we talked a lot about whales and we said, «When you go whale watching and a whale breaches, a whale jumps up above the water, everybody oohs and aahs and takes pictures of it and talks about «Oh, look at the whale,» and then the whale goes back under water for like 45 minutes, and it's the most boring thing in the world.

Some are the result of true innovation, some are examples of grace under pressure — and some things just go viral, because that's what happens now.

If you're going to be gone, give ample warning and let them know that things are under control, with appropriate detail.

The CHOICE Act would also roll back SIFI criteria for what are termed «living wills» — essentially these are liquidation resolution plans under bankruptcy laws to be implemented if things go to heck in a hand basket.

If you're going to be basically sleeping under your desk to get your start - up off the ground, why not make things a little more comfortable and actually merge your place of business with your place of residence?

L. Rev. 83 (2010), proposes going beyond merely permitting shareholder recommendations under 14a - 8 to, among other things, majority shareholder voting on corporate speech decisions.

«It was a big momentum deal, so when the bottom comes out from under it, you have to go back to the well and start the whole thing,» he says.

Sure, they can help you earn money that you could put toward many things — a retirement account, an emergency fund, a down payment — but you also run the risk of putting yourself in hot water if the company you've invested in goes under.

Good on you Katelyn, went through similar things when my start up went under.

And you may vote a certain way or not but that doesn't matter, you've got 27,000 employees and I think the fact is that you're operating under a Federal Trade Commission consent decree from 2011, that's a real thing and it goes for twenty years so when someone said «do we need more regulations, do we need more legislation?»

We, on the other hand, view it with hope: because more than anything, the events of the past few days show that the truth is getting out — the truth that capital markets simply can not exist under the authoritarian rule of central planners, the truth that the stock market is a casino in which the best one can hope for a quick flip, and finally the truth that our entire socio - economic regime, whose existence has been predicated by borrowing from the uncreated wealth of the future, and where accumulated debt could be wiped out at the flip of a switch if things go wrong in the process obliterating the welfare of billions (of less than 1 % ers), is one big lie.

What's more, the PMO's own statement then ran through a full litany of all the bad things that lie ahead: decline in global stock markets, decline in commodity prices, slowing growth in China and emerging markets, and potential impacts on Canada's economy. Instead of boasting about Canada's successes under Conservative leadership, the PMO went to great lengths to show how bad things could get.

«There's certainly fire under our feet to go faster and bolder, and I guess you could say that's the good thing about competition.»

Mr. Cassell said they wondered, «Are we under a Mumbai - style attack, where we've got multiple things going on at multiple properties?»

If you are worried that, under your post about Churchill, someone is going to post a comment chiding you for failing to mention that he was a monstrous racist, the thing to do is to stop worrying and say to hell with anyone who writes that comment.

I boldly went into a chat room once prattling on about stiff as a board light as a feather, ouijahs, and the thing under the bed.

For her, she said, speaking on NPR, going to funerals was partly a duty and partly a matter of learning to do things for others when doing them wasn't convenient, like going to «the painfully under - attended birthday party» and visiting someone in the hospital during happy hour.

Maybe they can move the old Arch Bishop who covered it up out, make him a cardinal, then make his replacement a cardinal for gladhanding the victims and sweeping things under the rug... then plead poverty and go about a few punitive church closings to teach the lay parishoners not to stand up to them no matter what their crimes... like they did here in Massachusetts.

I am the first in line to step up to the plate to help someone in need (a friend told me about a homeless man living under bridge in a small town of 1500... everyone knew he was there; police, mayor and other community members, though NO one did a thing, I personaly went bought a sleeping bag and 100.00 worth of food, storage bags and toiletries and whatever I thought he may need and this is the first time brought up.)

They will probably end up going under and destroying their business just because they wanted to punish employees through their religious beliefs — Management needs a good swift smack to the back of the head — hopefully that will knock some sense into things.

Within divinity colleges, training usually goes under the term «pastoral clinical education»... it is taken by those wanting to be chaplins in prisons and hospitals but is also classes can be taken (sometimes mandatory) by those entering into ministry, both for the reason that they may be counselling others, but also for them to look at and work with things that may be their own issues.

I think of the book of Hebrews, where the author is intent to show that Jesus Christ is far superior to anything which was offered under the Mosaic Law, and after we have Jesus, to go back to such things is sheer folly.

Choosing non-conformity doesn't mean we're all going to end up doing the same thing, that we'll all find ourselves working in a soup kitchen, or sleeping under a bridge.

It is always a tragedy and a horrific crime when people try to sweep such terrible things under the rug and ignore them, and I hope that you are able to help the police unveil the truth of what is going on.

Working for the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai Brith, Bernards was going around the country, much in the manner of an itinerant preacher, alerting people to a new thing under the sun, «the Jewish - Christian dialogue.»

There are some interesting (very) liberal things going on under the radar in some religions.

Well... I'm going to file that one under Things That I Wish Were True.

I go on the internet on occasion and read things that come up under the search «evidence for God», not because I need some, but because so many on here say, «show us the evidence and we will believe.»

The things that she could not control in her life — arguably the things that were not in her control, but under control of an all - powerful god — went horribly and painfully wrong.

Is a cultural change under way, or was the academy cleaning things up for the media and then going back to business as usual?

There would have been no other way I could have discovered these things — certainly not by engaging in the pallid and platitudinous mutual congratulation that usually goes on under the rubric of interreligious dialogue.

You might have fun saying that the problem here is that «things didn't go my way», but my way is equality under the law for everyone regardless of race, creed, disability, etc..

I commend enjoyment, for man has no good thing under the sun but to eat, and drink, and enjoy himself, for this will go with him in his toil through the days of life which God gives him under the sun.

In this elaborate, visually striking sequence, Lenny Belardo (played by Jude Law) crawls from under a pile of sleeping babies, wakes up from this dream, gets dressed, goes out to address his papacy saying — as he later puts it — outrageous things to the crowd, then gets excommunicated, only to wake up and realize this is yet another dream.

So wait you aren't going to blame what was obviously Politics on Religious Wars lets not forget that there were a few things involved in these «Wars of Religion» and I am sure most historians will agree with me, firstly the Crusades weren't thought up as some ideological crusade to protect Christians from some horde of Muslims coming from the east, they were in - fact land grabbing and trying to stave off the eventual fall of what is now known as Istanbul, secondly I highly doubt that most of the average religious person had any idea just how politicized the church became during this time period or up until probably John Paul the II took over, I mean the Thirty Years War could have been called a Religious war under this Videos silly assumptions.

I just wan na say weather what proof you have or evidence every religion book, scriptures, and testamony might know how the world will end but does nt know cause if everybody knew what day it was going to happen they would do all the things that people are doing following this man like quiting jobs and all that because in the bible under «THE CALL TO READINESS «it says God or jesus does nt want you to worry about when the world will end but the do want you to keep busy and continue to work hard JUST LIKE GOD DID TO CREATE the world so i do nt think noone should buy into this and it shouldnt be advertised cause thats not what GOD or JESUS would want because when he rises unexpectedly key word unexpectedly his joy and his welcoming would be him nknowing that the creatures aka as us humans have been following his will and working hard!!!

He goes on to say that there are some things that fall under an unchangeable choice, such as the priesthood, marriage, etc. (# 170 - 71, 189).

do you have any idea how it feels to stand in a room during a pledged of allegiance knowing your say under the god who want you dead, i refuse to stand every time and my heart skips a beat ever time, i feel like there going to turn to me and drag me out, the real saddest thing about the Sikhs is they are deistic and believe they pray to your god to,..

Or once again, in Leonard Hodgson's way of phrasing it, we are trying to find what the state of things really is, how things really go, in a fashion which makes sense to us, when we grant that men and women who lived at that time, under those conditions, with those presuppositions, spoke about the matter in that way.

We live under the «dispensation of grace,» when people are judged according to their personal relationship with Jesus Christ, but between now and the «dispensation of the millennial kingdom,» things are going to get ugly.

Yes, it does, and always will, but making war on religion — even on one of them — is the worst thing we can do, because the faith under siege would merely go underground.

I don't think it's so much about the levites being paid for their service it's about us doing what's right toward Pastors that must feed and tend to the flock of GOD if GOD has called them.JESUS even said in luke 10:7 that the laborers are worthy of their wages.In luke 8 1 - 4 it's says even JESUS HIMSELF recieved financial support from the women who ministered to him with their possessions.Now most people today would say he should have been ashamed of taking money from those poor women but JESUS accepted their support and they was blessed for sowing onto the LORD»S work.1 Corinthains 9:1 - 15 says dint muzzle the ox while it tread out the grain was GOD talking about oxes no he was talking about those who labor in the ministry.Who goes to war at their own expense.Or who goes to war but pay for their clothes, guns, etc.No one because the goverment if that country provide these things because of the soilders service.Who plants a vineyard and don't eat from it.Who tends a flock and don't drink the milk of it.I think it's just spiritual sense to support a pastor that's teaching you the word, casting out devils, laying hands and healing is manifesting in people lived, going to hospitails, prisons, and house calls to pray for the sick and shut in, going to graduations and funnerals, praying and fasting for himself and the flock.I think a person who think a pastor shouldn't be paid for their service either don't know they need to be paid and need to be taught or they are demonic in their thinking and either hate GOD, PASTORS, AND GOD»S PEOPLE.Why do nt you hear people saying anything against the dope dealers, strip clubs, dope houses, liquor stores, etc.It's only when people give into the LORD»S work that evil minded or misinformed people have a problem with it.No sir we don't have to use the old testament to show that we should support out pastors.You don't use the law, love tells me to support the pastor.Under the new testament LOVE is the greatest of all.Love for GOD and man.If GOD asked for 10 percent under the law to support the levites who didn't have all the responsibilities of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLESS.

The comparison demanded one thing further; for that ancient movement went forward under a great leader.

Really easy and simple to make and I whipped the whole thing up in under 10 minutes so it's a really great lunch option or on the go dinner.

I have been under the impression that Braggs does not have MSG but with the way a lot of things go, it is really difficult to find the truth.