a reasonable argument could be made for vieira's
goal against leicester city in the last game of the unbeaten season.
Will you please give reason as to why chelsea struggled to score two
goals against leicester city at the bridge.things like this happen in futbol.so, are you saying man city is crap cos they lost at home to stoke.dont forget the manner with which they won the league last season.the league is a marathon and it will be ridiculous to say chelsea is already the champ considering everton played us last week and chelsea this week - two energy sarping matches
Not exact matches
cause even the
goal difference isnt such a problem, if we want to go top the would have to lose 2 games and if they lose 2 games the difference in gd would sink atleast to just 3 between us and then if we win the games it would sink to atleast 1 so if we score 2
goals more than them in the other 6 games of us we would be top, well as long as spurs give up 4 points and i strongly believe that they will lose points, cause they are beatable cause they wont play like
leicester only on the break but would also want to dominate some games and
against liverpool / southampton that will be dangerous
Yet Everton lose and concede 3
goals at home, Chelsea concede
against 10 man city, Liverpool lose 2 in a row conceding 4
goals, and my favorite one of all — UTD are leading 3 - 1 and go on to lose 5 - 3
against leicester.
Our big problem has been our inability to score
goals and that explains a string of goaless draws we had with stoke and southamton... rember city had alot of possesion
against leicester but cld not account for it..
Current form is that
leicester are scoring freely
against teams like man city and liverpool whilst conceedind very few
goals.
Our attack was good, scoring four
goals against a packed
leicester defense who for the vast majority of the game were winning or drawing, either of which would be a good result for them, so there was no need for them to come out and attack.